Dalia Almaghaslah

Dr. Dalia Almaghaslah

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2021 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DADalia Almaghaslah
Dalia Almaghaslah
AAABDULRHMAN ALSAYARI
ABDULRHMAN ALSAYARI
GKGeetha Kandasamy
Geetha Kandasamy
RVRajalakshimi Vasudevan
Rajalakshimi Vasudevan
Ending the COVID-19 pandemic requires achieving herd immunity, either by previous infection or by vaccination. However, concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine are growing around the globe. The current study was conducted to investigate young the adult population’s hesitancy towards the vaccine. The study used a prospective cross-sectional design. Data was collected using an online self-administered questionnaire. A total of 862 Saudi adults participated. Information was gathered on the participants’ perspectives towards the severity and susceptibility of the COVID-19 infection, reasons for their hesitancy to receive the vaccine, perceived benefits, and reasons for action. Just under a quarter (19.6%) of respondents had previously tested positive for COVID-19. A small minority of the participants had already received the vaccine (2.1%), while 20.3% had registered in the Sehaty app (application) to receive the vaccine. Just under half of them (48%) will take the vaccine when mass vaccination is achieved and approximately the same number (46.7%) will only take it if it is made mandatory. Vaccine reluctance is highly prevalent among the general public in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic. While many are aware of a high likelihood of getting the infection, the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccine were reported as barriers to vaccination.

1 July 2020 in Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DADalia Almaghaslah
Dalia Almaghaslah
AAAbdulrhman Alsayari
Abdulrhman Alsayari
Background: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has required governments to implement preventive policies to control the spread of the virus. Temporarily closing schools and other educational institutions has been adopted in many countries, including Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to assess academic staff satisfaction with suspending face-to-face teaching and turning to web-based education. Additionally, this study assessed how the suspension of face-to-face classes has affected the administrative work, research, and community at the College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University. Methods: This study used a cross-sectional, self-administered, anonymous online questionnaire. A total of 59 academic staff were included. Results: More than half the participants (55.9%) agreed or strongly agreed that the sudden shift to online education was done smoothly, more than half (57.6%) agreed or strongly agreed that virtual lectures were more flexible than face-to-face lectures, and a majority (79.7%) agreed or strongly agreed that the technology used for online education was reliable. A minority of participants agreed or strongly agreed that research (20.4%), community service (11.4%), and participation in scientific meetings (15.2%) had not been affected by the suspension. Conclusion: Suspending classes without stopping education has been implemented effectively, and administrative work has continued to run smoothly. However, research, community service, and attending scientific meetings have been negatively impacted by the suspension.

4 August 2020 in International Journal Of Clinical Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DADalia Almaghaslah
Dalia Almaghaslah
GKGeetha Kandasamy
Geetha Kandasamy
MAMona Almanasef
Mona Almanasef
RVRajalakshimi Vasudevan
Rajalakshimi Vasudevan
SCSriram Chandramohan
Sriram Chandramohan

28 September 2018 in The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DADalia Almaghaslah
Dalia Almaghaslah
AAAbdulrhman Alsayari
Abdulrhman Alsayari
RARayah Asiri
Rayah Asiri
NANajla Albugami
Najla Albugami

5 July 2021 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAABDULRHMAN ALSAYARI
ABDULRHMAN ALSAYARI
AMAbdullatif Bin Muhsinah
Abdullatif Bin Muhsinah
DADalia Almaghaslah
Dalia Almaghaslah
SASivakumar Annadurai
Sivakumar Annadurai
SWShadma Wahab
Shadma Wahab
Respiratory tract infections are underestimated, as they are mild and generally not incapacitating. In clinical medicine, however, these infections are considered a prevalent problem. By 2030, the third most comprehensive reason for death worldwide will be chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), according to the World Health Organization. The current arsenal of anti-inflammatory drugs shows little or no benefits against COPD. For thousands of years, herbal drugs have been used to cure numerous illnesses; they exhibit promising results and enhance physical performance. Ginseng is one such herbal medicine, known to alleviate pro-inflammatory chemokines and cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8) formed by macrophages and epithelial cells. Furthermore, the mechanisms of action of ginsenoside are still not fully understood. Various clinical trials of ginseng have exhibited a reduction of repeated colds and the flu. In this review, ginseng’s structural features, the pathogenicity of microbial infections, and the immunomodulatory, antiviral, and anti-bacterial effects of ginseng were discussed. The focus was on the latest animal studies and human clinical trials that corroborate ginseng’s role as a therapy for treating respiratory tract infections. The article concluded with future directions and significant challenges. This review would be a valuable addition to the knowledge base for researchers in understanding the promising role of ginseng in treating respiratory tract infections. Further analysis needs to be re-focused on clinical trials to study ginseng’s efficacy and safety in treating pathogenic infections and in determining ginseng-drug interactions.

1 January 2018 in Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAbdulrhman Alsayari
Abdulrhman Alsayari
DADalia Almaghaslah
Dalia Almaghaslah
AKArwa Khaled
Arwa Khaled
SASivakumar Annadurai
Sivakumar Annadurai
MAMona Ali Alkhairy
Mona Ali Alkhairy
AAAbeer Mohammed Assiri
Abeer Mohammed Assiri
Background. A dramatic increase in the use of natural products and herbal medicines has been observed globally. Simultaneously, there has been an increase in safety concerns regarding the extensive use of these herbal remedies among health care practitioners. The urban and rural populations of Saudi Arabia still rely on traditional Arabic herbal medicines for the treatment of various diseases. Objectives. This study aimed to evaluate community pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices of herbal medicines in the Asir region, Saudi Arabia. Methods. An online cross‐sectional study was conducted among 233 community pharmacists using a structured questionnaire. Results. Pharmacists showed considerable knowledge of the indications of herbal products, with an average score of 84% correct answers, total P value < 0.05 and < 0.001. They were also knowledgeable about contraindications, side effects, and interactions, with an average score of 75% correct answers, total P value < 0.05 and < 0.001. Community pharmacists had a positive attitude towards herbal products, as 71% of them “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that herbal products were efficacious and 77% of them “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that those products should be sold only in a pharmacy. Herbal products were “often” or "always” dispensed by 67.3% of pharmacists in a pharmacy. Conclusion. Pharmacists generally exhibited good knowledge, a positive attitude, and effective practice towards herbal products. However, continuing education programs are needed to train pharmacists in providing client counseling on herbal medicine usage and dispensing them.