Vehicle-to-grid (V2G) systems play a key role in the integration of electric vehicles (EVs) into smart grids by enabling bidirectional energy flows between EVs and the grid. Optimizing V2G operations poses significant challenges due to the dynamic nature of energy demand, grid constraints, and user preferences. This paper addresses the optimization challenges in V2G systems and explores the use of artificial intelligence (AI) methods to tackle these challenges. The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of existing work on optimization in V2G systems and identifies gaps where AI-driven algorithms, machine learning, metaheuristic extensions, and agile optimization concepts can be applied. Case studies and examples demonstrate the efficacy of AI-driven algorithms in optimizing V2G operations, leading to improved grid stability, cost optimization, and user satisfaction. Furthermore, agile optimization concepts are introduced to enhance flexibility and responsiveness in V2G optimization. The paper concludes with a discussion on the challenges and future directions for integrating AI-driven methods into V2G systems, highlighting the potential for these intelligent algorithms and methods.

The adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) has gained significant momentum in recent years as a sustainable alternative to traditional internal combustion engine vehicles. However, the efficient utilization of batteries in EVs, coupled with the growing demand for sustainable transportation, has posed complex challenges for battery management in the context of electric vehicle routing problems in a broad sense, which includes vehicle routing problems, team orienteering problems, and arc routing problems, all of them using EVs. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art approaches, methodologies, and strategies for battery management in each of the aforementioned optimization problems. We explore the relevant factors influencing battery performance and the interplay between routing, charging, and energy management in the context of EVs. The paper also discusses the advances in optimization algorithms, vehicle-to-grid integration, and intelligent decision-making techniques aimed at enhancing the range, reliability, and sustainability of EV operations. Key findings indicate a paradigm shift towards addressing uncertainties, dynamic conditions, and synchronization challenges inherent in large-scale and dynamic routing problems within the context of EVs that require efficient battery management.

In urban logistics, effective maintenance is crucial for maintaining the reliability and efficiency of energy supply systems, impacting both asset performance and operational stability. This paper addresses the scheduling and routing plans for maintenance of power generation assets over a multi-period horizon. We model this problem as a multi-period team orienteering problem. To address this multi-period challenge, we propose a dual approach: a novel reinforcement learning (RL) framework and a biased-randomized heuristic algorithm. The RL-based method dynamically learns from real-time operational data and evolving asset conditions, adapting to changes in asset health and failure probabilities to optimize decision making. In addition, we develop and apply a biased-randomized heuristic algorithm designed to provide effective solutions within practical computational limits. Our approach is validated through a series of computational experiments comparing the RL model and the heuristic algorithm. The results demonstrate that, when properly trained, the RL-based model is able to offer equivalent or even superior performance compared to the heuristic algorithm.

This paper addresses the team orienteering problem (TOP) with vehicles equipped with electric batteries under dynamic travel conditions influenced by weather and traffic, which impact travel times between nodes and hence might have a critical effect on the battery capacity to cover the planned route. The study incorporates a novel approach for solving the dynamic TOP, comparing two solution methodologies: a merging heuristic and a reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm. The heuristic combines routes using calculated savings and a biased-randomized strategy, while the RL model leverages a transformer-based encoder–decoder architecture to sequentially construct solutions. We perform computational experiments on 50 problem instances, each subjected to 200 dynamic conditions, for a total of 10,000 problems solved. The results demonstrate that while the deterministic heuristic provides an upper bound for rewards, the RL model consistently yields robust solutions with lower variability under dynamic conditions. However, the dynamic heuristic, with a 20 s time limit for solving each instance, outperformed the RL model by $3.35\%$ on average. The study highlights the trade-offs between solution quality, computational resources, and time when dealing with dynamic environments in the TOP.

This paper presents a reinforcement learning (RL) approach for solving the team orienteering problem under both deterministic and dynamic travel time conditions. The proposed method builds on the transformer architecture and is trained to construct routes that adapt to real-time variations, such as traffic and environmental changes. A key contribution of this work is the model’s ability to generalize across problem instances with varying numbers of nodes and vehicles, eliminating the need for retraining when problem size changes. To assess performance, a comprehensive set of experiments involving 27,000 synthetic instances is conducted, comparing the RL model with a variable neighborhood search metaheuristic. The results indicate that the RL model achieves competitive solution quality while requiring significantly less computational time. Moreover, the RL approach consistently produces feasible solutions across all dynamic instances, demonstrating strong robustness in meeting time constraints. These findings suggest that learning-based methods can offer efficient, scalable, and adaptable solutions for routing problems in dynamic and uncertain environments.

In insurance portfolios, classifying customers without a prior history at a given company is particularly challenging due to the absence of historical behavior, extreme class imbalance, heavy-tailed loss distributions, and strict operational constraints. Traditional machine learning approaches, including the baseline methodology proposed in previous studies, typically optimize global predictive accuracy and therefore fail to capture business-critical outcomes, especially the identification of high-risk clients. This study extends the existing approach by evaluating two complementary business-aware classification strategies: (i) a balanced bagging ensemble specifically designed to handle class imbalance and maximize expected profit under explicit customer-omission constraints, and (ii) a lightweight Transformer-based architecture capable of learning richer feature representations. Both approaches incorporate the asymmetric financial cost structure of insurance and operate under operational selection limits. The empirical analysis is conducted on a proprietary large-scale auto insurance dataset comprising 51,618 customers and is complemented by validation on nine synthetic datasets to assess robustness. Model performance is evaluated using statistical tests (ANOVA, Friedman, and pair-wise comparisons) together with business-oriented metrics. The results show that both proposed approaches consistently outperform the baseline methodology (p < 0.001) in terms of profit, with the ensemble offering a better balance of performance and efficiency, while the Transformer shows stronger robustness and generalization under data perturbations. The balanced ensemble provides the most favourable trade-off between predictive performance, robustness, interpretability, and computational efficiency, making it suitable for deployment in regulated insurance environments, while the Transformer achieves competitive results and exhibits stronger generalization under data perturbations. The proposed approach aligns machine learning with actuarial portfolio optimization by explicitly integrating profit-driven objectives and operational constraints, offering two practical and scalable solutions for risk-based decision-making in real-world insurance settings.