Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, is currently available for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. We compared the efficacies of tegoprazan-based triple and concomitant therapies in a real-world practice. Data of patients treated with a 14-day tegoprazan-based triple therapy (50 mg of tegoprazan + 1000 mg of amoxicillin + 500 mg of clarithromycin twice daily) or 10-day tegoprazan-based concomitant therapy (50 mg of tegoprazan + 1000 mg of amoxicillin + 500 mg of clarithromycin + 500 mg of metronidazole twice daily) were retrospectively reviewed. Primary endpoint was eradication rate in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Of the 928 included patients, 551 and 377 were treated with triple and concomitant therapies, respectively. Eradication rate from ITT analysis was 76.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72.7–79.8%) in the triple therapy group and 85.9% (95% CI, 82.2–89.2%) in the concomitant therapy group (p < 0.001). Eradication rate in the per-protocol analysis was also higher in the concomitant therapy group than in the triple therapy group (triple vs. concomitant therapy: 84.5% [81.1–87.5%] vs. 91.1% [87.8–93.8%]). Overall adverse event rate was 29.0% in the triple therapy group and 45.9% in the concomitant therapy group (p < 0.001). Adherence rate was similar between the two groups (triple vs. concomitant therapy: 90.0 vs. 92.6%, p = 0.180). Overall, the 10-day tegoprazan-based concomitant therapy had superior efficacy than the 14-day tegoprazan-based triple therapy for H. pylori eradication. Although concomitant therapy showed common adverse events, adherence was comparable between the two therapies.

Introduction: Maintenance therapy is crucial in managing and preventing symptom relapse in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), with continuous and on-demand therapy being the common approaches. However, maintenance therapy using potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), such as fexuprazan, remains incompletely evaluated. Methods: This single-center, single-arm, prospective cohort study enrolled individuals with weekly heartburn or acid regurgitation and confirmed erosive esophagitis. The participants received 40 mg fexuprazan daily for 4 weeks as initial therapy, followed by 4 weeks of maintenance therapy. Patients chose either continuous or on-demand therapy for maintenance, according to their preference. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients selecting on-demand therapy. The symptom scores were assessed using the GERD questionnaire (GERD-Q) and patient assessment of upper-gastrointestinal-disorders symptoms questionnaire (PAGI-SYM). Results: The 31 included participants showed a significant reduction in symptom scores after initial treatment (baseline vs. 4-week: GERD-Q, 9.0 vs. 6.5, p < 0.001; PAGI-SYM, 29.0 vs. 10.8, p < 0.001). Twenty-one (67.7%) patients chose on-demand therapy after initial treatment. The symptom scores did not differ significantly before and after maintenance therapy (4-week vs. 8-week: GERD-Q, 6.5 vs. 6.0, p = 0.225; PAGI-SYM, 10.8 vs. 9.0, p = 0.354). Although this relation was not significant, patients experiencing larger decreases in symptom scores tended to prefer on-demand therapy. After maintenance therapy, the symptom scores did not differ between continuous and on-demand therapy (GERD-Q, 5.3 vs. 6.3, p = 0.342; PAGI-SYM, 9.4 vs. 8.8, p = 0.611). Conclusions: Fexuprazan was effective as an initial and maintenance therapy in patients with GERD who showed typical symptoms. Approximately 68% of the patients preferred on-demand therapy as a maintenance treatment. Based on the patient’s preference for maintenance therapy, symptom control did not differ between continuous and on-demand therapy.

Objectives: Associated factors for the failure of Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication have been evaluated in many studies; however, the different study population of previous studies prevents us from understanding the comparative risk between factors. We aimed to comprehensively investigate factors associated with successful HP eradication based on a single study population.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of adults diagnosed with HP infection between March 2021 and October 2022 at Hanyang University Guri Hospital. The study categorized eradication treatment methods based on the type of acid blockers (proton pump inhibitor [PPI] or potassium-competitive acid blocker [P-CAB]), antibiotic combination, and treatment duration. Demographics and clarithromycin-resistance mutation status were also considered as potential factors of HP eradication.Results: A total of 554 patients who received first-line HP eradication therapy were included. In the full-analysis set, the eradication rates according to the regimen were as follows: 7-day tegoprazan-based triple, 61.6%; 14-day tegoprazan-based triple, 77.5%; 14-day rabeprazole-based triple, 71.1%; 10-day rabeprazole-based concomitant, 73.1%; 10-day tegoprazan-based concomitant, 80.5%. The 14-day triple and 10-day concomitant therapies showed a superior eradication rate to the 7-day triple therapy regardless of the type of acid blockers (PPI or P-CAB). Additionally, clarithromycin-resistance mutation was the strongest predictor for eradication failure (hazard ratio 9.86 [95% confidence interval, 2.07–46.97]).Conclusions: The 14-day triple and 10-day concomitant therapy was superior to the 7-day triple therapy regardless of PPI or P-CAB use. However, clarithromycin-resistance mutation status was a more powerful predictor for HP eradication than the type of antibiotics and treatment duration.

Background/Aims: Both endoscopic resection (ER) and transanal surgery (TAS) are minimally invasive treatment options that allow organ preservation in early rectal tumors. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare treatment outcomes between the 2 treatments.Methods: We searched all relevant studies published until January 2024 that examined the comparative outcomes between ER and TAS for rectal tumors, including adenoma, adenocarcinoma, and neuroendocrine tumor (NET). TAS included transanal excision, transanal endoscopic microsurgery, and transanal minimally invasive surgery.Results: Seventeen studies with a total of 1,569 patients were included in this meta-analysis. For adenoma/adenocarcinoma, the R0 resection rate did not differ between ER and TAS (risk ratio [RR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94–1.03). For NET, the R0 resection rate was lower in the ER group than in the TAS group (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68–0.84) and the procedure time for ER was shorter than that for TAS. For both adenoma/adenocarcinoma and NET, ER and TAS did not differ in terms of complication rates, additional surgery, and recurrence.Conclusions: ER and TAS showed similar treatment outcomes for adenoma/adenocarcinoma. Considering that TAS typically incurs higher costs than ER, ER may be favored in the treatment of rectal adenoma/adenocarcinoma. For rectal NET, TAS showed a superior R0 resection rate than ER. However, given that TAS requires a long procedure time, expensive equipment, and complex manipulations, TAS may be considered selectively for large NETs with suspected deep tumorous infiltration.