Background: To characterize contrast sensitivity function (CSF) in cataractous and pseudophakic eyes compared to healthy control eyes using a novel quantitative CSF test with active learning algorithms. Methods: This is a prospective observational study at an academic medical center. CSF was measured in eyes with visually significant cataract, at least 2+ nuclear sclerosis (NS) and visual acuity (VA) ≥ 20/50, in pseudophakic eyes and in healthy controls with no more than 1+ NS and no visual complaints, using the Manifold Contrast Vision Meter. Outcomes included Area under the Log CSF (AULCSF) and CS thresholds at 1, 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (cpd). A subgroup analysis as performed on cataract eyes with VA ≥ 20/25. Results: A total of 167 eyes were included, 58 eyes in the cataract group, 77 controls, and 32 pseudophakic eyes with respective median AULCSF of 1.053 (0.352) vs 1.228 (0.318) vs 1.256 (0.360). In our multivariate regression model, cataract was associated with significantly reduced AULCSF (P= 0.04, β= − 0.11) and contrast threshold at 6 cpd (P= 0.01, β= − 0.16) compared to controls. Contrast threshold at 6 cpd was significantly reduced even in the subgroup of cataractous eyes with VA ≥ 20/25 (P=0.02, β=− 0.16). Conclusion: The novel qCSF test detected disproportionate significant contrast deficits at 6 cpd in cataract eyes; this remained significant even in the cataractous eyes with VA ≥ 20/25. CSF testing may enhance cataract evaluation and surgical decision-making, particularly in patients with subjective visual complaints despite good VA.

There is no Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease (oGVHD) to date, and current therapeutic options are limited. Forehead application of 1% progesterone gel provides corneal antinociception in preclinical models, suggesting it may be useful in alleviating ocular irritations. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1% progesterone gel in treating moderate to severe symptomatic oGVHD. Thirty-three patients with oGVHD following allogeneic stem cell transplantation were enrolled in this single-center, sponsor-initiated, prospective exploratory randomized double-masked placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial. The inclusion criteria included a National Institutes of Health consensus score of ≥2, moderate to severe ocular discomfort level, and receipt of a stable immunosuppression regimen. Twenty-one of the 22 patients in the progesterone arm and all 11 patients in the placebo arm completed the course of twice-daily forehead drug application for 10 weeks. The changes from baseline of self-reported ocular symptom scores and physician-recorded cornea fluorescein staining scores were analyzed using mixed-model repeated-measures regression model in an intention-to-treat population. The 33 patients included 12 women and 21 men, with a median age of 66 years (range, 24 to 75 years). At 10 weeks, there was a significant reduction in ocular symptoms from baseline in the progesterone group compared with the placebo group in symptom frequency (-30.7 versus -2.2; P < .001) and severity (-19.8 versus +1.6; P = .005). At 10 weeks, there was also greater reduction of cornea fluorescein staining centrally (-1.2 versus +.1; P = .001) and inferiorly (-1.4 versus -0.2; P = .005). No difference was noted in superior cornea staining. There were no severe adverse events in the progesterone group. Forehead application of 1% progesterone gel significantly improved ocular signs and symptoms within 10 weeks. It appears to be a safe and effective new therapy for oGVHD, and a novel mechanism for neuroaxis drug delivery. A multicenter phase III clinical trial is planned for further validation.

Ocular Graft-versus-Host Disease (oGVHD) remains a challenging and potentially devastating complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). It significantly impacts the quality of life of affected survivors, however, is often underrecognized particularly during the early stages. Targeting all providers in the HSCT community who see patients regularly and frequently for their post-allo-HSCT care, this review and opinion piece introduces the basic concepts of ocular surface pathophysiology, dissects the different stages of clinical presentation of oGVHD, explains why the current diagnostic criteria tend to capture the late disease stages, highlights the warning signs of early disease development, in hope to facilitate prompt referral of oGVHD suspects for ocular specialist care. In addition to introducing a comprehensive list of treatment options, this review emphasizes basic therapeutic strategy and options that are safe and effective to be initiated by any care provider. We believe in empowering the patients as well as the care providers beyond disciplinary boundaries, in order to provide the most cohesive and integrated care to our patients in a multidisciplinary approach.

Purpose: To understand the degree and explore the possible causes of ocular graft-versus-host disease (oGVHD) underdiagnosis in patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Patients and Methods: A 15-question survey was emailed to 6032 subscribers to the Blood and Marrow Transplant Information Network. A total of 371 respondents confirmed the history of allo-HSCT, of which 335 were symptomatic. Their self-reported symptoms, onset, treatments tried, degree of symptom control and established diagnoses of systemic chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) and oGVHD were analyzed. Results: Among the 335 symptomatic survey respondents, 306 reported their ocular symptom onset was after allo-HSCT, with only 170 [55.6% (170/306)] ever receiving a diagnosis of oGVHD; 23 reported worsening pre-existing ocular symptoms after allo-HSCT, with only 5 [21.7% (5/23)] ever receiving a diagnosis of oGVHD; 6 reported stable symptoms before and after allo-HSCT, with 1 ever receiving a diagnosis of oGVHD. Of the 176 respondents carrying the diagnosis of oGVHD, 167 [94.9% (167/176)] also had the diagnosis of cGVHD. Logistic regression analysis showed that the diagnosis of oGVHD was highly correlated with the number of symptoms and treatments one reported. Furthermore, 35% of the respondents with new onset ocular symptoms reported onset within the first 6 months after allo-HSCT (previously reported), as well as 39% of the respondents with worsened existing symptoms. Conclusion: oGVHD underdiagnosis is likely associated with the previous diagnostic criteria, in which cGVHD of another organ system was required. The correct notion that oGVHD commonly causes severe dry eye disease has likely led to its underdiagnosis in patients with fewer number of symptoms and/or who tried fewer treatments.