Including an unanticipated stimulus has significant impacts on lower extremity biomechanics during dynamic movements. It is unknown how a live, human defender affects lower extremity biomechanics. The purpose of this study was thus to determine the effects of two types of unanticipated stimuli (visual stimulus; defensive opponent) on lower extremity kinematics and kinetics in males and females during 45° sidestepping trials. Eight males and eight females completed two unanticipated stimuli sidestepping conditions. Numeric visual analog scales for reaction difficulty and movement realism were collected and analysed using a 2 × 2 mixed-model ANOVA. Three-dimensional hip, knee, and ankle kinematics and kinetics were measured during the stance phase of the sidestep and analysed using statistical parametric mapping. Participants reported greater difficulty and less realistic movements with the visual stimulus. Unanticipated stimulus main effects were observed for knee abduction angle, and hip extension and adduction, and knee extension and adduction moments. Sex main effects were observed for hip flexion, hip abduction, and ankle dorsiflexion angles, as well as hip abduction, ankle plantarflexion and ankle eversion moments and vertical ground reaction forces. Participants responded differently to two unanticipated stimuli. Careful consideration should be used when determining the type of unanticipated stimulus used.

Understanding the effects of training in different footwear on sporting performance would be useful to coaches and athletes. Purpose: This study compared the effects of computerized agility training using 3 types of footwear on change-of-direction and balance performance in young adults. Method: Thirty recreationally active young adults (M_age = 22.8 ± 3.1 years; M_height = 1.71 ± 0.7 m; M_bodymass = 73.4 ± 10.3 kg) were randomly assigned to a 6-week computerized agility training intervention in 1 of 3 footwear groups (n = 10/group): barefoot, minimal footwear, or traditional shoes. Participants had no previous barefoot or minimal-footwear training experience. Dependent variables included change-of-direction test time to completion, Star Excursion Balance Test, and single-leg stability evaluation. Testing was performed at the start of the training program, after 2 weeks, after 4 weeks, and at the end of the training program. Results: No group or time interactions were found for any of the dependent variables. Time main effects were observed for the performance measures of change of direction, Star Excursion, and single-leg-with-eyes-open stability evaluation. Participants improved in all 3 tests as early as 2 weeks into the intervention, with improvements continuing through the entire 6-week intervention. Conclusions: The lack of interaction and footwear effects suggests that agility and balance improvements during foot agility training are independent of footwear in a recreationally active young-adult population. Computerized agility training improves change-of-direction and balance performance within 2 weeks of training implementation. Future studies should consider footwear training effects in different populations, including frail older adults and athletes.

Landing is considered a “high-risk” movement for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Foot progression angle (FPA) during landing has been shown to influence hip, knee, and ankle mechanics. The purpose of this study was to compare five FPA conditions during drop landings between males and females.