Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential tools in medical research. Systematic reviews are a type of literature review that uses a systematic process to identify and assess all available literature on a specific research question. A meta-analysis is a statistical method of synthesizing the results of a systematic review by quantitatively combining data. The process begins with formulating a well-defined research question using frameworks. Comprehensive literature searches across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, to ensure the inclusion of diverse studies. Tools like EndNote and Covidence streamline reference management and study selection, enhancing efficiency and accuracy. Quality assessment using tools like the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale is crucial to evaluate the methodological rigor. Data extraction, using standardized forms to ensure consistent information capture. Qualitative synthesis is one method that integrates the results of a systematic review focusing on textual data. Meta-analysis employs statistical software such as R and RevMan to compute effect sizes, confidence intervals, and assess heterogeneity. Visual representations, including forest and funnel plots, facilitate the interpretation of results. Challenges such as publication bias and heterogeneity are addressed using statistical methods like Egger regression and the trim-and-fill technique. Sensitivity analyses further validate the robustness of findings. Common errors, including data entry mistakes and inappropriate pooling, are mitigated through rigorous methodological adherence and critical self-evaluation. Meticulously conducted, systematic reviews and meta-analyses represent the pinnacle of the evidence hierarchy, driving advancements in medical research and practice.

Key Clinical Message: When treating a painless or asymptomatic mass in the submental or floor of the mouth, sublingual epidermoid cyst should be considered. Despite its irregularity, preventing malignant transformation is essential for a successful outcome. Dermoid and epidermoid cysts are rarely found in the head and neck region. They account for less than 0.01% of all oral cavity cysts. This is a rare case of a sublingual epidermoid cyst of the oral cavity in a 25‐year‐old male. The patient presented with a painless sublingual swelling for a duration of 1 month. The clinical examination revealed a non‐tender swelling in the sublingual region extending to the submental triangle. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a 6.2 × 7.7 × 3.2 cm cystic lesion in the sublingual space. Fine needle aspiration cytology confirmed dermoid cyst contents. Intra‐oral surgical excision under general anesthesia was performed successfully. Histopathological analysis revealed that the cyst wall was lined by stratified squamous epithelium. The presence of a prominent granular layer and keratin flakes confirmed the diagnosis of an epidermoid cyst. Postoperative recovery was good, and no recurrence was observed during follow‐up. This case emphasizes the infrequent and unusual presentation of a case of a giant plunging sublingual epidermoid cyst and promotes awareness and potential studies in the enhancement of patient care in this area.