Purpose: To investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) and evaluate the influencing factors of local efficacy. Methods: From January 2013 to January 2017, 137 CRLM patients accepting US-guided percutaneous MWA were included. The 2450-MHz microwave ablation system and a cooled-shaft antenna were used. All patients were regularly followed up for at least 6 months. Technical success, complete ablation, local tumor progression (LTP), complications and side effects were assessed. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent prognostic factors for LTP. Results: In total, 411 lesions (mean diameter 15.4 ± 7.2 mm, range 5–67 mm) were treated. Complete ablation was achieved in 99.27% (408/411) of lesions and 97.81% (134/137) of patients. LTP occurred in 5.35% (22/411) of lesions and 16.06% (22/137) of patients. LTP was more likely to occur in lesions larger than 3 cm in diameter (OR: 14.71; p < .001; 95% CI: 3.7 3–57.92), near a large vascular structure (OR: 7.04; p < .001; 95% CI: 2.41–20.60), near the diaphragm (OR: 4.02; p = .049; 95% CI: 1.05–16.11) and in patients with no response to chemotherapy before MWA (OR: 3.25; p = .032; 95% CI: 1.14–15.30). MWA was well tolerated, with a major complication rate of 3.65%, a minor complication rate of 8.03% and a mortality rate of 0%. Fever and pain were the most common side effects after MWA. Conclusions: US-guided percutaneous MWA of CRLM is a safe and effective method that is expected to become a routine treatment for local tumor control of CRLM.

Background: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is becoming a standard assessment tool in Crohn’s disease (CD), but limited data exist on its ability to predict long-term objective outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the predictive value of IUS findings for long-term transmural healing (TH) and mucosal healing (MH) in CD. Methods: We prospectively included consecutive CD patients with active endoscopic disease and bowel wall thickness (BWT) >3.0 mm, initiating infliximab. Intestinal ultrasound parameters (ie, BWT, inflammatory mesenteric fat [i-fat], bowel blood flow and stratification) and International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score (IBUS-SAS) were collected at baseline, after 14 to 26 weeks (visit 1, postinduction) and 44 to 56 weeks (visit 2). Transmural healing (normalization of all IUS parameters) and MH (SES-CD ≤2) were assessed at visit 2. Results: One hundred twenty-nine patients were evaluated. At visit 2, 38.0% and 48.1% of patients achieved TH and MH, respectively. All the IUS parameters and IBUS-SAS showed improvement at visit 1 and visit 2 compared with the baseline (all P < .001). Multivariable analysis found that presence of i-fat at baseline (odds ratio [OR], 0.57; P = .008) and greater postinduction BWT (OR, 0.24; P < .001) were negative predictors for TH, while higher baseline (OR, 0.98; P = .013) and postinduction (OR, 0.94; P < .001) IBUS-SAS predicted negatively for MH. Postinduction BWT <4.5mm best predicted TH (AUC 0.85; P < .001), while postinduction IBUS-SAS <25.0 best predicted MH (AUC 0.82; P < .001). Moreover, colonic disease was associated with higher risk of TH (OR, 2.55; P = .027), and disease duration >24 months with lower risk of MH (OR, 0.27; P = .006). Conclusions: Baseline and postinduction IUS findings reliably predict long-term TH and MH in patients with CD receiving infliximab.

Background For patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), clinical guidelines recommend imaging-guided thermal ablation combined with systemic therapy. However, the optimal thermal ablation strategy remains unclear. Purpose To compare long-term outcomes between patients who underwent upfront ablation or delayed ablation for unresectable CRLM. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with unresectable CRLM (three or fewer lesions; diameter, <3 cm) admitted to one of seven hospitals between October 2009 and December 2020. Upfront ablation was performed 2-4 weeks before the start of systemic therapy, and delayed ablation was performed 2-3 months after the start of systemic therapy. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for differences in baseline variables between groups. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary outcome. Overall survival (OS), complications, and adverse events were secondary outcomes. Outcomes were compared between groups by using the log-rank test. Results In total, 255 patients who underwent delayed ablation (mean age, 57 years ± 11 [SD]; 184 men [72%]) and 103 patients who underwent upfront ablation (mean age, 56 years ± 12; 72 men [70%]) were included. After propensity score matching (n = 100 in both groups), the 5-year DFS for patients who underwent upfront ablation was better compared with patients who underwent delayed ablation (36% vs 21%; P = .02). For 5-year OS, no evidence of a difference was observed between ablation strategies (delayed ablation, 59% vs upfront ablation, 64%; P = .49). Additionally, no differences were observed between ablation strategies with respect to the rates of ablative complications (delayed ablation, 6% vs upfront ablation, 5%; P = .76) or drug-related adverse events (delayed and upfront ablation both 9%; P = .99). Conclusion In patients with relatively few (three or fewer) and small (<3 cm) unresectable CRLM, upfront thermal ablation combined with adjuvant systemic therapy led to better DFS compared with delayed ablation. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Georgiades in this issue.

Thermal ablation is an alternative treatment for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM). However, prognostic factors in patients with CRLM who have undergone microwave ablation (MWA) have not been clearly defined. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the risk factors associated with early recurrence in patients with CRLM treated with MWA.Herein, we retrospectively analyzed data for 140 patients with CRLM who underwent MWA from 2013 to 2015 in our institution. Patients were grouped by median pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level into the high CEA level (>3.7 ng/mL) group and low CEA level (≤3.7 ng/mL) group. Variables that might affect overall survival were subjected to univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis.Our results showed a median progression-free survival (PFS) and median liver progression-free survival (LPFS) of 9 and 11.5 months, respectively, for the 99 CRLM patients analyzed. Both the median PFS duration (7.5 vs. 12.0 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.852; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.131-3.034; P = .014) and LPFS duration (7.5 vs 14.0 months; HR: 2.117; 95% CI: 1.247-3.593; P = .005) were significantly shorter in the high CEA level group than in the low level group. In multivariable analysis, high CEA level, >3 tumors, and positive node status for the primary tumor were independent factors for PFS, with corrected HRs of 2.11 (95% CI: 1.257-3.555; P = .005), 2.450 (95% CI: 1.420-4.226; P = .001), and 2.265 (95% CI: 1.304-3.935; P = .004), respectively. However, age, tumor size, regional lymph node were not associated with LPFS.CEA level could be a valuable prognostic factor for early recurrence in patients with CRLM after MWA irrespective of the presence of early local recurrence in the liver or disease progression.