Anne Marie Jukic

Dr. Anne Marie Jukic

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 August 2013 in Human Reproduction
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AJAnne Marie Jukic
Anne Marie Jukic
DBDonna Baird
Donna Baird
CWClarice R. Weinberg
Clarice R. Weinberg
DMD.R. McConnaughey
D.R. McConnaughey
AWA.J. Wilcox
A.J. Wilcox
How variable is the length of human pregnancy, and are early hormonal events related to gestational length? Among natural conceptions where the date of conception (ovulation) is known, the variation in pregnancy length spanned 37 days, even after excluding women with complications or preterm births. Previous studies of length of gestation have either estimated gestational age by last menstrual period (LMP) or ultrasound (both imperfect measures) or included pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology. The Early Pregnancy Study was a prospective cohort study (1982–85) that followed 130 singleton pregnancies from unassisted conception to birth, with detailed hormonal measurements through the conception cycle; 125 of these pregnancies were included in this analysis. We calculated the length of gestation beginning at conception (ovulation) in 125 naturally conceived, singleton live births. Ovulation, implantation and corpus luteum (CL) rescue pattern were identified with urinary hormone measurements. We accounted for events that artificially shorten the natural length of gestation (Cesarean delivery or labor induction, i.e. ‘censoring’) using Kaplan–Meier curves and proportional hazards models. We examined hormonal and other factors in relation to length of gestation. We did not have ultrasound information to compare with our gold standard measure. The median time from ovulation to birth was 268 days (38 weeks, 2 days). Even after excluding six preterm births, the gestational length range was 37 days. The coefficient of variation was higher when measured by LMP (4.9%) than by ovulation (3.7%), reflecting the variability of time of ovulation. Conceptions that took longer to implant also took longer from implantation to delivery (P = 0.02). CL rescue pattern (reflecting ovarian response to implantation) was predictive (P = 0.006): pregnancies with a rapid progesterone rise were longer than those with delayed rise (a 12-day difference in the median gestational length). Mothers with longer gestations were older (P = 0.02), had longer pregnancies in other births (P < 0.0001) and were heavier at birth (P = 0.01). We did not see an association between the length of gestation and several factors that have been associated with gestational length in previous studies: body mass index, alcohol intake, parity or offspring sex. The sample size was small and some exposures were rare, reducing power to detect weak associations. Human gestational length varies considerably even when measured exactly (from ovulation). An individual woman's deliveries tend to occur at similar gestational ages. Events in the first 2 weeks after conception are predictive of subsequent pregnancy length, and may suggest pathways underlying the timing of delivery. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.

1 June 2016 in Fertility and Sterility
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAnne Z. Steiner
Anne Z. Steiner
AJAnne Marie Jukic
Anne Marie Jukic

15 November 2007 in American Journal of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AJAnne Marie Jukic
Anne Marie Jukic
CWClarice R. Weinberg
Clarice R. Weinberg
AWAllen J. Wilcox
Allen J. Wilcox
DMD. Robert McConnaughey
D. Robert McConnaughey
PHPaige Hornsby
Paige Hornsby
DBDonna Baird
Donna Baird
There are many studies based on self-reported menstrual cycle length, yet little is known about the validity of this measure. The authors used data collected in 1990 from 352 women born in Chicago, Illinois, aged 37–39 years. Women reported their usual cycle length and behavioral and reproductive characteristics at study enrollment and then completed daily menstrual diaries for up to 6 months. The authors compared this observed cycle length (geometric mean) with the reported length by using kappa coefficients. To assess systematic effects, they performed linear regression of the difference between reported and observed cycle length. Agreement between observed and reported cycle length was moderate. The crude overall kappa coefficient was 0.33; the kappa adjusted for within-woman sampling variability was 0.45 (95% confidence interval: 0.36, 0.55). On average, women overestimated their cycle length by 0.7 days (95% confidence interval: 0.3, 1.0). Reporting by sexually active women and women with a history of infertility was more accurate. Parity, body mass index, prior medical evaluation for irregular cycles, and exercise were all associated with systematic reporting differences. Studies that rely on self-reported cycle length could be prone to artifactual findings because of systematic covariate effects on reporting.

1 March 2016 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AJAnne Marie Jukic
Anne Marie Jukic
ACAntonia M. Calafat
Antonia M. Calafat
DMD. Robert McConnaughey
D. Robert McConnaughey
MLMatthew Longnecker
Matthew Longnecker
JHJane A. Hoppin
Jane A. Hoppin
DBDonna Baird
Donna Baird
[acf field=ehp_author_refs] [toggle title=Author Affiliations float=left width=100% margin=0 20px 20px 0 status=closed] [acf field=ehp_author_affiliations] [/toggle] [acf field=ehp_pdf] [tabgroup] [tab title=Abstract] [acf field=ehp_abstract] [/tab] [tab title=About This Article] [acf field=ehp_about_article] [text-blocks id=62755 plain=1] [/tab] [tab title=Supplemental Material] [acf field=...

1 June 2018 in Fertility and Sterility
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BSBrianna M. Lyttle Schumacher
Brianna M. Lyttle Schumacher
AJAnne Marie Jukic
Anne Marie Jukic
ASAnne Z. Steiner
Anne Z. Steiner

1 November 2007 in Journal of Women's Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AJAnne Marie Jukic
Anne Marie Jukic
CWClarice R. Weinberg
Clarice R. Weinberg
DBDonna Baird
Donna Baird
AWAllen J. Wilcox
Allen J. Wilcox
Purpose: Variability in menstrual cycle length, largely determined by variation in follicular phase length, is related to several health outcomes, yet the causes of this variability are incompletely understood. We sought to identify characteristics associated with follicular phase length. Methods: We used the North Carolina Early Pregnancy Study to describe factors correlated with timing of ovulation (follicular phase length). Women collected daily urine specimens and recorded vaginal bleeding. Specimens were assayed for estrone 3-glucuronide and pregnanediol 3-glucuronide, which in turn were used to estimate the day of ovulation. All other variables were assessed through interview. Associations with follicular phase length were evaluated using a multiple regression model. Results: We determined follicular phase length for the first cycles of 201 women. Women with a history of miscarriage tended to have shorter follicular phases (2.2 days). Longer duration of oral contraceptive (OC) use and recent OC use (in the last 90 days) were both correlated with longer follicular phase. Occasional marijuana users (up to three times in the last 3 months) had a longer follicular phase than nonusers (3.5 days); the follicular phase in frequent users (more than three times) was almost 2 days longer than that of nonusers. Conclusions: The association between marijuana use and longer follicular phase is consistent with prior rhesus monkey research that shows ovulatory delay or inhibition.