Background: Despite advances in treatment, the prognosis of resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains poor. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has gained great interest in hopes of improving survival. However, the results of available studies based on different treatment approaches, such as chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, showed contrasting results. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to clarify the benefit of NAT compared to upfront surgery (US) in primarily resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: A PRISMA literature review identified 139 studies, of which 15 were finally included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. All data from eligible articles was summarized in a systematic summary and then used for the meta-analysis. Specifically, we used HR for OS and DFS and risk estimates (odds ratios) for the R0 resection rate and the N+ rate. The risk of bias was correctly assessed according to the nature of the studies included. Results: From the pooled HRs, OS for NAT patients was better, with an HR for death of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.72–0.90) at a significance level of less than 1%. In the sub-group analysis, no difference was found between patients treated with chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy exclusively. The meta-analysis of seven studies that reported DFS for NAT resulted in a pooled HR for progression of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.56–0.79) with a significance level of less than 1%. A significantly lower risk of positive lymph nodes (OR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.32–0.63) and an improved R0 resection rate (OR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.23–2.36) were also found in patients treated with NAT, despite high heterogeneity. Conclusions: NAT is associated with improved survival for patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma; however, the optimal treatment strategy has yet to be defined, and further studies are required.

The management of metastatic colorectal cancer in patients harboring RAS mutations primarily involves chemotherapy, often combined with bevacizumab, as a standard first-line treatment. However, emerging evidence suggests that tumors in a subset of these patients may experience a conversion from RAS-mutant status to RAS wild type (wt) during or after chemotherapy, a process referred to as “RAS conversion” or “neo-RAS wt”. Understanding the mechanisms driving the neo-RAS wt phenomenon is crucial for its application in personalized medicine. Hypotheses suggest that selective pressure from chemotherapy may lead to a decrease in the number of mutant RAS clones or an outgrowth of pre-existing RAS wt clones. Further research is needed to validate these mechanisms and understand the impact of the neo-RAS wt phenomenon on long-term outcomes, such as overall survival and progression-free survival. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of the neo-RAS wt phenomenon, including its incidence, potential mechanisms, and clinical implications.

Recent studies have shown that immune-related adverse events (irAEs), occurring even after the discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), may be associated with favorable disease outcomes, particularly in patients with melanoma and lung cancer. However, a few clinical cases have been described on the correlation between irAEs and ICIs efficacy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. This study reports the clinical case of a metastatic RCC patient who has experienced severe immune-related renal toxicity after 19 months of nivolumab use. Despite immunotherapy discontinuation, the patient has maintained clinical benefit and disease progression-free for 3 years. We examined the correlation between the occurrence and the severity of irAEs, treatment discontinuation and clinical benefits. The evidence on ICI retreatment following ICI discontinuation due to irAEs was also reviewed. Lay abstract Immunotherapy has profoundly changed the treatment scenario of cancer patients. However, similar to any oncological therapy, it may cause immune-related adverse events. Cancer patients experiencing immune-related adverse events have a higher probability of better survival outcomes. This correlation has been largely described in patients with melanoma and lung cancer, but only a few data have been reported for genitourinary tumor patients. Here, we report the clinical case of a metastatic renal cell carcinoma patient who has experienced a late-onset and severe immune-related renal toxicity after 19 months of immunotherapy, which led to treatment discontinuation. Despite this, the patient has maintained a clinical benefit and disease progression-free for more than 3.5 years. We reviewed the literature on the correlation between immunotherapy benefit and immune-related adverse events, considering the time of onset, the severity of the adverse events and the concepts of treatment discontinuation and retreatment.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improved the therapeutic scenario of many different advanced malignancies and could be an effective treatment strategy in synchronous or metachronous... Plain language summary Immunotherapy is an effective treatment strategy across different cancer types and could be a valid treatment strategy in patients with multiple malignant tumors. In this sce...