Background: Food allergies are a growing global health concern, particularly among children, with no widely approved curative treatment beyond strict allergen avoidance. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has emerged as a promising strategy to induce desensitization, yet its implementation is limited due to high rates of allergic reactions and patient non-compliance. Omalizumab, a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, has been proposed as an adjunct to OIT to enhance safety and efficacy. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in combination with OIT for IgE-mediated food allergy in children. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Central databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), and observational studies assessing omalizumab as an adjunct to OIT in pediatric food allergy. Studies were evaluated for desensitization rates, immunological changes, adverse events, and quality-of-life improvements. Results: OIT combined with omalizumab led to significantly higher rates of desensitization, allowing patients to tolerate higher doses of allergens in a shorter timeframe compared to OIT alone. Omalizumab was associated with a reduction in adverse reactions, including anaphylaxis, and improved treatment adherence. However, the long-term sustainability of tolerance post-omalizumab discontinuation remains uncertain. Conclusions: Omalizumab facilitates rapid and effective desensitization in pediatric food allergy, enhancing the safety of OIT. Further research is needed to determine optimal treatment duration, long-term outcomes, and cost-effectiveness before widespread clinical adoption.

Cow’s milk allergy is one of the most prevalent food allergies in infancy. Exclusive breastfeeding is the recommended source of nutrition for the first six months of life, but some infants may develop cow’s milk allergy due to the transfer of milk proteins such as β-lactoglobulin through breast milk. There are still many uncertainties about cow’s milk allergy in breastfed babies. The purpose of this review is to summarize the latest findings mainly focused on immunological mechanisms and challenges in diagnosis. We pointed out which clinical signs in breastfed infants are associated with immediate IgE responses and which are linked to delayed non-IgE mechanisms or mixed IgE/non-IgE-mediated reactions. Since standard IgE tests are often useless in non-IgE cases, diagnosis typically involves dietary elimination and cow’s milk challenge. This study addresses the controversial topic of maternal elimination diets, assessing the nutritional risks to both mothers and infants in relation to their possible benefits. It has also been discussed whether the microbiota signature could be a potential factor in both tolerance development and the risk of cow’s milk allergy in early life. Overall, accurate diagnosis and personalized treatment plans are vital to prevent overdiagnosis and ensure proper growth while maintaining the practice of breastfeeding.

Asthma and food allergy are two complex allergic diseases with an increasing prevalence in childhood. They share risk factors, including atopic family history, atopic dermatitis, allergen sensitization, and T2 inflammatory pathways. Several studies have shown that in children with a food allergy, the risk of developing asthma, particularly in early childhood, is high. Food allergen intake or the inhalation of aerosolized allergens can induce respiratory symptoms such as bronchospasm. Patients with both conditions have an increased risk of severe asthma exacerbations, hospitalization, and mortality. The current management of clinical food hypersensitivity primarily involves the dietary avoidance of food allergens and the use of self-injectable adrenaline for severe reactions. Poorly controlled asthma limits the prescription of oral immunotherapy to foods, which has emerged as an alternative therapy for managing food allergies. Biological therapies that are effective in severe asthma have been explored for treating food allergies. Omalizumab improves asthma control and, either alone or in combination with oral immunotherapy, increases the threshold of allergen tolerance. Understanding the interplay between asthma and food allergy is crucial for developing successful treatment approaches and ameliorating patient results.

Background/Objectives: Evidence-based recommendations are vital in healthcare to standardize care, reduce variability, and improve patient outcomes. In children, anaphylaxis, allergy to antibiotics, and hymenoptera venom allergy are among the commonest reasons for allergological evaluation. This work was intended to optimize the prescriptions for allergological evaluation and for the related diagnostic tests with the aim of improving the management of children with allergic diseases and promoting resource efficiency. Methods: A systematic literature review of the literature was performed to formulate recommendations on the diagnostic management of children with anaphylaxis, drug allergy, and hymenoptera venom allergy. Results: Effective management of anaphylaxis involves rapid assessment and specialist follow-up to identify triggers, prevent recurrence, and ensure patients and caregivers are educated and equipped with an adrenaline auto-injector. Integrating skin testing, specific serological assays, and oral provocation tests into the diagnostic process for children with suspected beta-lactam allergy enhances diagnostic accuracy and minimizes unnecessary avoidance of first-line antibiotics. Children and adolescents with systemic reactions to hymenopteran stings should be referred to an allergy specialist for diagnosis, risk assessment, management education, and adrenaline prescription. Conclusions: These recommendations may enhance care quality, minimize inappropriate prescriptions, and support standardized methods of diagnosis of allergological diseases in children.

Background: Food allergy is a heterogeneous pediatric disease involving IgE-mediated, non-IgE-mediated, and mixed immune mechanisms, with manifestations ranging from mild symptoms to life-threatening anaphylaxis. Current diagnostic tools, including clinical history, skin prick testing, serum specific IgE measurement, and oral food challenge, have limitations in specificity, invasiveness, prognostic value, and ability to guide personalized management. Methods: This narrative review summarizes emerging biomarkers in pediatric food allergy and evaluates their diagnostic, prognostic, predictive, and therapeutic potential. A literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Central for English-language studies published between December 2015 and March 2026. Eligible studies included original clinical or translational research involving children aged 0–18 years and assessing functional cellular assays, epithelial barrier markers, intestinal permeability, gut microbiota, metabolomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenetics, and immune biomarkers. Findings were synthesized qualitatively according to biomarker category and biological function. Results: Functional cellular biomarkers, particularly the basophil activation test, show the greatest translational readiness, with high diagnostic specificity, utility in reaction threshold and severity assessment, and potential value for monitoring oral immunotherapy. Biomarkers of epithelial barrier dysfunction, including zonulin, tight junction proteins, epithelial injury markers, filaggrin variants, and epithelial-derived cytokines, provide mechanistic insight into allergic sensitization and gastrointestinal phenotypes but remain insufficiently validated. Microbiota-derived, metabolomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, epigenetic, and integrated multi-omics approaches offer promising tools for risk prediction, tolerance monitoring, endotype identification, and precision medicine. Conclusion: Emerging biomarkers may improve diagnosis, risk stratification, therapeutic monitoring, and personalized care in pediatric food allergy. However, standardized assays, large longitudinal pediatric studies, and external validation are required before routine clinical implementation.

Background: Food allergy is a heterogeneous pediatric disease involving IgE-mediated, non-IgE-mediated, and mixed immune mechanisms, with manifestations ranging from mild symptoms to life-threatening anaphylaxis. Current diagnostic tools, including clinical history, skin prick testing, serum-specific IgE measurement, and oral food challenge, have limitations in specificity, invasiveness, prognostic value, and ability to guide personalized management. Methods: This narrative review summarizes emerging biomarkers in pediatric food allergy and evaluates their diagnostic, prognostic, predictive, and therapeutic potential. A literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Central for English-language studies published between December 2015 and March 2026. Eligible studies included original clinical or translational research involving children aged 0–18 years and assessing functional cellular assays, epithelial barrier markers, intestinal permeability, gut microbiota, metabolomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenetics, and immune biomarkers. Findings were synthesized qualitatively according to biomarker category and biological function. Results: Functional cellular biomarkers, particularly the basophil activation test, show the greatest translational readiness, with high diagnostic specificity, utility in reaction threshold and severity assessment, and potential value for monitoring oral immunotherapy. Biomarkers of epithelial barrier dysfunction, including zonulin, tight junction proteins, epithelial injury markers, filaggrin variants, and epithelial-derived cytokines, provide mechanistic insight into allergic sensitization and gastrointestinal phenotypes but remain insufficiently validated. Microbiota-derived, metabolomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, epigenetic, and integrated multi-omics approaches offer promising tools for risk prediction, tolerance monitoring, endotype identification, and precision medicine. Conclusions: Emerging biomarkers may improve diagnosis, risk stratification, therapeutic monitoring, and personalized care in pediatric food allergy. However, standardized assays, large longitudinal pediatric studies, and external validation are required before routine clinical implementation.