Alexander E. Ropper

Dr. Alexander E. Ropper


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 June 2018 in Neurospine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VBVivek B. Beechar
Vivek B. Beechar
PZPascal Oliver Zinn
Pascal Oliver Zinn
KHKent A. Heck
Kent A. Heck
GFGregory N. Fuller
Gregory N. Fuller
IHInbo Han
Inbo Han
ARAlexander E. Ropper
Alexander E. Ropper
Spinal epidermoid tumors are rare, benign tumors that are either acquired from trauma, surgery, or lumbar puncture or arise as congenital lesions, particularly spinal dysraphisms. We report a case of a massive spinal epidermoid tumor and review the literature with a focus on the surgical outcomes. A 71-year-old female patient presented after a fall with subsequent symptoms of severe back and hip pain, as well as loss of motor strength in the left leg. Her magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a T2/short tau inversion recovery hyperintense mass extending from the level of the T10-11 disc caudally through S2. A biopsy was recommended to determine whether the tumor was radio- or chemo-sensitive. The patient underwent a L4 laminectomy and a pearly-white tumor was encountered, with a subsequent biopsy confirming it to be an epidermoid tumor. The following conclusions can be drawn from a review of the literature. Spinal epidermoid tumors are more common in women and tend to present in younger patients (median age of 23). The majority of patients had acquired lesions (46%). In terms of surgical outcomes for adherent tumors, gross total resection was found to provide optimal outcomes, with 90% of patients improving clinically after surgery.


30 June 2022 in Neurospine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RGRon Gadot
Ron Gadot
DSDavid N. Smith
David N. Smith
MPMarc Prablek
Marc Prablek
JGJoey K. Grochmal
Joey K. Grochmal
AFAlfonso Fuentes
Alfonso Fuentes
ARAlexander E. Ropper
Alexander E. Ropper
Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is devastating for patients and their caretakers and has an annual incidence of 20–50 per million people. Following initial assessment with appropriate physical examination and imaging, patients who are deemed surgical candidates should undergo decompression with stabilization. Earlier intervention can improve neurological recovery in the post-operative period while allowing earlier mobilization. Optimized medical management is paramount to improve outcomes. Emerging strategies for managing SCI in the acute period stem from an evolving understanding of the pathophysiology of the injury. General areas of focus include ischemia prevention, reduction of secondary injury due to inflammation, modulation of the cytotoxic and immune response, and promotion of cellular regeneration. In this article, we review established, emerging, and novel experimental therapies. Continued translational research on these methods will improve the feasibility of bench-to-bedside innovations in treating patients with acute SCI.

1 December 2018 in Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJonathan N. Sellin
Jonathan N. Sellin
RMRory R. Mayer
Rory R. Mayer
MHMarcus Hoffman
Marcus Hoffman
ARAlexander E. Ropper
Alexander E. Ropper

1 February 2021 in Seminars in Plastic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TVTerence Verla
Terence Verla
DXDavid S. Xu
David S. Xu
MDMatthew J. Davis
Matthew J. Davis
EREdward M. Reece
Edward M. Reece
MKMichelle Kelly
Michelle Kelly
ARAlexander E. Ropper
Alexander E. Ropper
Failed fusion in the cervical spine is a multifactorial problem stemming from a combination of patient and surgical factors. Patient-related risk factors such as steroid use, poor bone quality, and smoking can be optimized preoperatively. Age, prior radiation, prior surgery, and underlying genetics are nonmodifiable patient-centered risk factors. Surgical risks for failed fusion include the number of segments fused, anterior versus posterior approach for fusion, the type of bone graft, and the instrumentation utilized. Many symptomatic cases of failed fusion (pseudarthrosis) result in pain, neurological deficits, or loosened hardware necessitating a revision surgery consisting of extending the prior construct and utilizing additional allografts or autografts to augment the fusion. Given the relatively mobile nature of the cervical spine, pseudoarthrosis (either known or anticipated) must be recognized by the spine surgeon, and steps should be considered to optimize the likelihood of future fusion. This consists of both performing a rigid fixation and using appropriate bone graft to enhance the environment for arthrodesis. Vascularized bone grafts are a useful tool to augment fusion and provide added structural stability in cases at high risk of pseudoarthrosis.

1 April 2020 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRita Snyder
Rita Snyder
TVTerence Verla
Terence Verla
ARAlexander E. Ropper
Alexander E. Ropper