This study aimed to evaluate kinesiophobia levels in patients with osteoporosis compared to healthy controls and investigate the associations with pain, depression, anxiety, fear of falling, and quality of life.

This study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the 2-Minute Step Test (2MST) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). This cross-sectional study involved 55 volunteers, aged 18-80, diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. The participants were assessed using the 2MST, the 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). To evaluate the reliability of the 2MST, test-retest reliability was determined by administering the 2MST again after a 7-day interval. The reliability analysis included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC₉₅). For concurrent validity, the correlations of the 2MST with the 2MWT, 6MWT, and ODI were assessed. The 2MST exhibited excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.94, SEM = 5.56, MDC₉₅=15.41) in LSS patients. Additionally, the 2MST showed significant correlations with the 2MWT (r = 0.842, p < 0.001), 6MWT (r = 0.819, p < 0.001), and ODI score (r = -0.722, p < 0.001). This study demonstrated that the 2MST is a valid and reliable tool for assessing exercise capacity in individuals with LSS. NCT06060821.

Objectives: Lower extremity lymphedema due to secondary causes is a lifelong complication that can be encountered. Its treatment is essential, because it has significant impact on quality of life and daily living activities related to lower extremity involvement. This research aims to compare the effects of Manual Lymphatic Drainage Massage (MLD) and Negative Pressure Massage Therapy (NPMT) treatments in order to provide maximum benefit to patients. Methods: This prospective, randomized study included 30 patients with lower extremity lymphedema due to secondary causes. Patients, randomized using computer software, were divided into two groups. The first group (n =15) received 45 minutes, 15 sessions of MLD, while the second group (n =15) received 45 minutes of 15 sessions of NPMT using the LymphaTouch device. Compression bandaging was applied to both groups and self-drainage training was given to all patients. The circumference of the extremity at 6 reference points were measured and their pain and discomfort assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were recorded before and after treatment. Changes within the groups and between the groups were compared using the SPSS statistical program. Results: Statistically significant improvement was observed in all parameters in both treatment groups. The decrease in VAS pain and VAS discomfort scores (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01; respectively), circumference measurement of the extremity (p < 0.01) was statistically greater in the NPMT group compared to the MLD group. Conclusions: In conclusion, NPMT appears to be a beneficial non-invasive treatment method for reducing extremity volumes and decreasing subjective pain and discomfort in lymphedema patients.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between nutritional status, assessed by the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, and functional recovery in patients with stroke undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. Methods: A total of 113 patients diagnosed with stroke were included in this observational study. Nutritional status was evaluated using the CONUT score, and functional independence and baseline disability were assessed with the Modified Barthel Index (mBI) and the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at admission. Functional independence was reassessed with the mBI at discharge. Patients were divided into four groups based on their CONUT score: normal, mild, moderate, and severe malnutrition risk. Results: According to CONUT classification, 37.2% of patients were normal, 46.0% were at mild, 13.3% at moderate, and 3.5% at severe risk of malnutrition. A weak positive correlation was found between CONUT score and age (r = 0.186, p = 0.049). CONUT score was negatively correlated with vitamin D (r = –0.212, p = 0.024), albumin (r = –0.636, p < 0.001), total protein (r = –0.387, p < 0.001), LDL (r = –0.445, p < 0.001), and total cholesterol (r = –0.444, p < 0.001). Within-group comparisons showed significant improvement in mBI scores from admission to discharge in the normal (p < 0.001), mild (p < 0.001), and moderate (p = 0.024) groups, but not in the severe malnutrition group (p = 0.317). Conclusions: Although no statistically significant association was found between the CONUT score and mBI outcomes, patients with better nutritional status showed a clinical trend toward greater functional improvement during rehabilitation, whereas those with severe malnutrition demonstrated limited gains. These findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the very small number of patients in the severe malnutrition group. Early screening and appropriate nutritional management using objective tools such as the CONUT score may still support rehabilitation planning in stroke patients.