This exploratory study was aimed at evaluating the current status of global occupational therapy practice on the use of assessments for clients with cognitive impairments and providing recommendations for ongoing evidence. We targeted international occupational therapy clinicians working with clients experiencing neurocognitive impairments. 323 occupational therapists from a wide range of clinical practice areas participated in the study. A large number of therapists used noncognitive specific assessments with a focus on functional approaches. The most commonly used standardized assessments were the COPM (56.7%), followed by MMSE (54.2%) and MoCA (45.5%), while the nonstandardized assessments were clinical observation (38.4%) and generic ADL assessment (34.1%). The use of main assessments was significantly different across world regions (p<0.05), as were the reasons for choosing them (p<0.05). The occupational therapists’ use of assessment tools with clients suffering from neurocognitive impairments is inconsistent across the globe. The identification of international best practices for selecting and implementing proper outcome measures is warranted. It is essential to promote the development of an occupational therapy initiative to support the use of appropriate assessments at the international levels to facilitate consistent best practice.

There is a shortage of tools designed for use by occupational therapy practice in Arabic-speaking countries. The purpose of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the original Satisfaction with Daily Occupations tool to Arabic and assess the psychometric properties of the adapted tool. A cross-cultural adaptation process was performed. Face, content, and criterion validity were examined, as well as internal consistency and test–retest reliability. The study included 147 healthy adults and 73 patients with cerebrovascular accident. They were purposefully selected from two countries (Kuwait and Jordan). The adapted tool comprised six domains and a total of 14 items. Face and content validity were established through prolonged content analysis. Criterion validity was indicated by significant differences between the healthy and the cerebrovascular accident group in all areas of the Satisfaction Daily Occupations scale (p < 0.001). Satisfactory overall internal consistency (α = 0.77) and good test–retest reliability for the total satisfaction score for the healthy (inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.984) and the cerebrovascular accident group (inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.933) were found. The Satisfaction with Daily Occupations-Arabic version is a valid and reliable tool for use with Arabic-speaking occupational therapy clients. This study has several implications for occupational therapy education, practice, and research in the Arab world.

Background and Objectives: Caring for an individual with dementia encompasses many challenges. This can lead to increased burden, anxiety, and mental health issues among those taking care of them. Limited research exists investigating the care of people with dementia in Kuwait, particularly regarding the mental health of caregivers. There is a need to understand the impact of caregiver burden in this population. This study aimed to assess the level of burden of care, depression, anxiety, and well-being among caregivers of the elderly with dementia in Kuwait. Methods: This study used a descriptive and cross-sectional design. To measure the burden of care, depression, anxiety, and well-being of the caregivers, we utilized the Zarit Burden Interview, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to compare the results of the parametric and non-parametric methods. Results: This study included 180 (65%) caregivers for the elderly with dementia and 98 (35%) without dementia. The descriptive statistics showed that caregivers for the elderly with dementia and caregivers for the elderly without dementia experienced moderate burden (17.21 ± 9.09 and 14.51 ± 8.08, respectively), borderline abnormal anxiety (9.92 ± 5.15 and 8.61 ± 4.79, respectively), borderline abnormal depression (8.69 ± 4.35 and 8.06 ± 4.24, respectively), and low mental health well-being (54.40 ± 25.10 and 58.90 ± 23.42, respectively). The t-test of independent samples and Mann–Whitney U test results showed that the burden and anxiety in the caregivers for the elderly with dementia group were statistically significantly higher than those in the caregivers for the elderly without dementia group (p = 0.015 and p = 0.039; p = 0.026 and p = 0.027, respectively). The ANOVA test and Kruskal–Wallis test revealed that the caregivers for the elderly with dementia group had statistically significant differences in burden (p < 0.001; p < 0.001), anxiety (p = 0.048; p = 0.043), depression (p = 0.017; p = 0.009), and mental health well-being (p = 0.001; p = 0.002) scores across various durations of care. The multiple linear regression showed that caregiving was a significant predictor of burden of care and anxiety, indicating that caregivers of the elderly with dementia experienced a higher burden of care than those caring for the elderly without dementia. In addition, confounders with significant influence were duration of care (p < 0.001), education level (p = 0.002), employment status (p = 0.008), and gender (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Family caregivers experienced significant levels of burden of care and anxiety when caring for the elderly with dementia. A multidimensional holistic approach is needed to provide family caregivers of the elderly with dementia with valuable interventions.

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to examine the level of generalized anxiety disorder among occupational and physical therapists during treatment sessions and its association with somatic symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design was used in this study. Data were collected during the month of April 2021, and the study included occupational and physical therapists who practiced during COVID-19 from March 2020 to March 2021. The generalized anxiety disorder scale (GAD-7) and a modified patient health questionnaire (mPHQ-15) were used to examine self-reported anxiety and somatic symptoms among the study participants. The independent t-test was used to determine differences between groups based on GAD-7 and mPHQ-15 results. Spearman's correlation test and chi-squared test were used to find the relationships between different variables such as anxiety and somatic symptoms.Results: The study (n = 98 participants) included 56 occupational and 42 physical therapists. An 84% response rate was achieved. GAD-7 final score was μ = 9.21 ± 5.63 with 27% reporting no anxiety, 14% mild, 38% moderate, and 21% severe. Independent t-tests on GAD-7 scores showed significant differences between therapist specializations [t₍₉₆₎ = −2.256; p = 0.026] and between therapists residing with or without their parents [t₍₉₆₎ = −2.536; p = 0.013]. The mPHQ-15 final score was μ = 9.52 ± 5.54 with 13% reporting no symptoms (n = 13), 20% mild (n = 20), 38% moderate (n = 37), and 29% severe (n = 28). GAD-7 and mPHQ-15 scores were moderately positively correlated [r₍₉₆₎ = 0.569; p <0.000]. The chi-squared test showed a significant association between GAD-7 levels of anxiety and mPHQ-15 levels of somatic symptoms [x²_{(9, N = 98)} = 70.62 p <0.000]. Therapists reported that the quality (76%) and effectiveness (20%) of their rehabilitation services were negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.Conclusion: The majority of study participants experienced moderate to severe anxiety and associated somatic symptoms. During COVID-19, ongoing psychological counseling of healthcare professionals such as occupational and physical therapists is required to maintain positive mental health. Implications for practice are presented.