Aim: Anastomotic leakage after restorative surgery for rectal cancer shows high morbidity and related mortality. Identification of risk factors could change operative planning, with indications for stoma construction. This retrospective multicentre study aims to assess the anastomotic leak rate, identify the independent risk factors and develop a clinical prediction model to calculate the probability of leakage.Methods: The study used data from 24 Italian referral centres of the Colorectal Cancer Network of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology. Patients were classified into two groups, AL (anastomotic leak) or NoAL (no anastomotic leak). The effect of patient‐, disease‐, treatment‐ and postoperative outcome‐related factors on anastomotic leak after univariable and multivariable analysis was measured.Results: A total of 5398 patients were included, 552 in group AL and 4846 in group NoAL. The overall incidence of leaks was 10.2%, with a mean time interval of 6.8 days. The 30‐day leak‐related mortality was 2.6%. Sex, body mass index, tumour location, type of approach, number of cartridges employed, weight loss, clinical T stage and combined multiorgan resection were identified as independent risk factors. The stoma did not reduce the leak rate but significantly decreased leak severity and reoperation rate. A nomogram with a risk score (RALAR score) was developed to predict anastomotic leak risk at the end of resection.Conclusions: While a defunctioning stoma did not affect the leak risk, it significantly reduced its severity. Surgeons should recognize independent risk factors for leaks at the end of rectal resection and could calculate a risk score to select high‐risk patients eligible for protective stoma construction.

This study was designed to compare the efficacy of two different "chemical sphincterotomies" for chronic anal fissure. From January to December 2001, 30 consecutive patients (17 males; mean age, 41.8 years) with chronic posterior anal fissure were enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned to receive 0.2 percent glycerine trinitrate ointment applied three times daily at the anal margin for eight weeks (Group A) or 20 units Botulinum toxin A injection into the internal anal sphincter on each side of the anterior midline (Group B). The patients were reviewed at 15 days, 1, 3, 6, 12, and every other 12 months. Follow-up ranged between 36 and 46 months. Patients in either group who failed to improve were referred for surgical treatment. Twelve patients in Group A and 11 in Group B had improvement or relief from symptoms at the first visit. The fissure was healed in ten patients in Group A and in eight in Group B within three months (66.7 and 57.1 percent). Recurrence of the fissure occurred in five patients in each group during the follow-up. The healing rate at three years was 40 and 33.3 percent for Group A and B, respectively. No patients in either group reported serious adverse effects; however, three patients in Group A (20 percent) had transient headache. None had fecal incontinence. Both treatments may be considered as first-line treatment even if less effective than surgery.

To assess whether the use of the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2) in systematic reviews (SRs) adheres to RoB2 guidance. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library from 2019 to May 2021 to identify SRs using RoB2. We analyzed methods and results sections to see whether risk of bias was assessed at outcome measure level and applied to primary outcomes of the SR as per RoB2 guidance. The relation between SR characteristics and adequacy of RoB2 use was examined by logistic regression analysis. Two hundred-eight SRs were included. We could assess adherence in 137 SRs as 12 declared using RoB2 but actually used RoB1 and 59 did not report the number of primary outcomes. The tool usage was adherent in 69.3% SRs. Considering SRs with multiple primary outcomes, adherence dropped to 28.8%. We found a positive association between RoB2 guidance adherence and the methodological quality of the reviews assessed by AMSTAR2 (p-for-trend 0.007). Multivariable regression analysis suggested journal impact factor [first quartile vs. other quartiles] was associated with RoB2 adherence (OR 0.34; 95% CI: 0.16-0.72). Many SRs did not adhere to RoB2 guidance as they applied the tool at the study level rather than at the outcome measure level. Lack of adherence was more likely among low and very low quality reviews.

Introduction Since the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), it became evident that a proportion of patients may present with gastrointestinal symptoms. Case We report the case of a Covid-19-infected patient who, during recovery from the pulmonary pneumonia, had gastrointestinal symptoms followed by a diastasic right colon perforation due to acute over distension of the bowel. Conclusion This case highlights the importance of paying attention to initial gastrointestinal symptoms in order to prevent possible complications.