Łukasz Zandecki

Dr. Łukasz Zandecki

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2020 in European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJacek Kurzawski
Jacek Kurzawski
AJAgnieszka Janion-Sadowska
Agnieszka Janion-Sadowska
ŁZŁukasz Zandecki
Łukasz Zandecki
MSMarcin Sadowski
Marcin Sadowski

6 June 2013 in BioMed Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AJAgnieszka Janion-Sadowska
Agnieszka Janion-Sadowska
MSMarcin Sadowski
Marcin Sadowski
JKJacek Kurzawski
Jacek Kurzawski
ŁZŁukasz Zandecki
Łukasz Zandecki
MJMarianna Janion
Marianna Janion
Coronary artery disease complicates only 0.01% of all pregnancies. For this reason, more exhaustive data on the management of such cases is lacking. Even guidelines on management of cardiovascular disease in pregnant women are scarce focusing mainly on acute myocardial infarction. This is a complex issue involving thorough evaluation of cardiovascular status in each pregnant woman, assessment of risk for developing coronary complications, and close cooperation with obstetric teams. Safety data on typical cardiac drugs such as statins, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or novel antiplatelet drugs are also scarce and their effect on the developing human fetus is not well understood. We present a review on the management of such patients.

1 May 2020 in Coronary Artery Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ŁPŁukasz Piątek
Łukasz Piątek
AJAgnieszka Janion-Sadowska
Agnieszka Janion-Sadowska
KPKarolina Piątek
Karolina Piątek
ŁZŁukasz Zandecki
Łukasz Zandecki
MZMichał Zabojszcz
Michał Zabojszcz
MSMarcin Sadowski
Marcin Sadowski
Background: Both unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) are still classified together in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes despite the fact they substantially differ in both clinical profile and prognosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate contemporary clinical characteristics and outcomes of unstable angina patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in comparison with stable angina and NSTEMI in Swietokrzyskie District of Poland in years 2015–2017. Methods: A total of 7187 patients after PCI from ORPKI Registry (38% with diagnosis of unstable angina) were included into the analysis. Impact of clinical presentation (unstable angina, stable angina, NSTEMI, STEMI) on three-year outcomes were determined. Results: Unstable angina patients were older than stable angina but younger than NSTEMI individuals. In unstable angina group, the percentage of previous myocardial infarction (MI), PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was the highest among all analyzed groups. In three-year observation, the risk of death as well as MI and MACE in unstable angina after PCI was higher than stable angina angina but considerably lower than in the NSTEMI group. Multivariate analysis confirmed that prognosis in NSTEMI was substantially worse in comparison with unstable angina [relative risk (RR) 1.365, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.126–1.655, P = 0.0015]. On the contrary in unstable angina and stable angina patients, the impact of diagnosis on mortality risk was similar (RR 1.189, 95% CI: 0.932–1.518, P = 0.1620). Parallel results were observed in respect of MI and MACE. Independent predictors of death or MACE were: age, kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes, previous stroke or previous PCI. Conclusion: Three-year prognosis in unstable angina was considerable better in comparison with NSTEMI. On the contrary, after adjustment for baseline differences, the outcomes (death, MI, MACE) in unstable angina and stable angina patients were comparable.

1 August 2017 in Coronary Artery Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ŁZŁukasz Zandecki
Łukasz Zandecki
MSMarcin Sadowski
Marcin Sadowski
MJMarianna Janion
Marianna Janion
MGMarek Gierlotka
Marek Gierlotka
MGMariusz Gasior
Mariusz Gasior
LPLech Polonski
Lech Polonski
During the last decade, there has been an increased awareness of sex differences in the clinical characteristics, management, and mortality in myocardial infarction. Many previous studies have found that women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have a poorer baseline risk profile, are less intensively treated, and have worse outcomes. To evaluate whether sex disparities in STEMI have changed in recent years. This is a retrospective analysis of data on 111 148 STEMI patients enrolled in the Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes between 2005 and 2011. Temporal trends in the clinical presentation, treatment strategies, and mortality rates between men and women are compared. Throughout the study, women were, on average, older than men, and more frequently presented with hypertension, diabetes, or obesity. These differences showed a tendency for narrowing. The percentage of smokers increased in both sexes. Despite a reduction in prehospital delays, they remained longer in women. Sex differences in prehospital cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock at admission disappeared. In 2011, women were still less likely to undergo coronary angiography with subsequent revascularization, but it was mainly driven by patients older than 70 years of age who also had a higher in-hospital mortality. Despite the greater relative risk reductions, the crude mortality rates remained significantly higher in women. Female sex was not an independent predictor of mortality. Sex differences in STEMI patients were narrowing from 2005 to 2011 in Poland. However, more attention needs to be focused on increasing smoking prevalence, the longer times from symptoms onset to hospital admission in women and the lower frequencies of the use of an invasive treatment strategy in older women, and their worse in-hospital outcomes.

16 June 2020 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ŁZŁukasz Zandecki
Łukasz Zandecki
AJAgnieszka Janion-Sadowska
Agnieszka Janion-Sadowska
JKJacek Kurzawski
Jacek Kurzawski
LPLukasz Piatek
Lukasz Piatek
MZMichał Zabojszcz
Michał Zabojszcz
MSMarcin Sadowski
Marcin Sadowski
With the emerging interest in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), there is a need to define an even broader group of patients with the syndrome of myocardial ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). There are limited data on the clinical characteristics and prognoses of such patients who present with symptoms of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and undergo urgent coronary angiography that reveals no significant lesions. The aim of this observational study was to compare patients with ACS INOCA and those with ACS with obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD) both within unadjusted cohorts and with propensity score matched controls. This observational study was based on the data from the Polish National Registry of Invasive Cardiology Procedures. Of 9744 patients included, 7624 had OCAD and 2120 had ACS INOCA. In unadjusted cohorts, the overall survival and incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: death, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure hospitalization) until 36 months were higher in patients with ACS OCAD. Following propensity matching, higher win ratios of death (p = 0.02), additional revascularizations by percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (p<0.001), and cardiac hospitalization (p<0.001) were observed in these patients. In contrast, the win ratios of myocardial infarction (p = 0.74), heart failure hospitalization (p = 0.86), and MACE (p = 0.07) were not significantly different between the groups. The prognosis of patients with ACS INOCA was more favorable than that of patients with ACS OCAD; however, the differences diminished after adjustments for the initial clinical profiles. An ACS incident should not be judged as trivial even when cardiac markers remain stable and no significant lesions are found on angiography.

15 February 2020 in Cardiovascular Ultrasound
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJacek Kurzawski
Jacek Kurzawski
AJAgnieszka Janion-Sadowska
Agnieszka Janion-Sadowska
ŁZŁukasz Zandecki
Łukasz Zandecki
LPLukasz Piatek
Lukasz Piatek
DKDorota Koziel
Dorota Koziel
MSMarcin Sadowski
Marcin Sadowski
Background: Peak left atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) can help identify left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) in patients with atrial fibrillation. Nevertheless, few studies have been performed in patients in sinus rhythm without established indications for anticoagulation but with increased risk of LAAT, such as heart failure (HF) with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction patients. The primary aim of this study was to identify clinical and transthoracic echocardiography predictors of LAAT in HF patients with very low left ventricular ejection fraction and sinus rhythm. The secondary objective was to analyze frequencies and predictors of a composite clinical endpoint of death or hospitalization for ischemic stroke. Methods: We included 63 patients with HF, left ventricular ejection fraction < 25%, sinus rhythm at presentation, no history of atrial fibrillation, and without any established indications for anticoagulation. We determined whether clinical and transthoracic echocardiography parameters, including left atrial strain analysis, predicted LAAT. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed in all patients. When LAAT was detected, anticoagulation was recommended. The participants were followed for a median of 28.6 months (range 4–40) to determine the composite endpoint. Results: LAAT was found in 20 (31.7%) patients. Global PALS was the best independent predictor of LAAT in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses (Gini coefficient 0.65, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve 0.83). A global PALS value below 8% was a good discriminator of LAAT presence (odds ratio 30.4, 95% CI 7.2–128, p < 0.001). During follow-up, 18 subjects (28.6%) reached the composite clinical endpoint. CHA2DS2-VASc score, use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, and body surface area were significant predictors for the composite endpoint of death or hospitalization for ischemic stroke in the multivariate regression model. Conclusions: LAAT was relatively common in our group of HF patients and PALS has shown prognostic potential in LAAT identification. Further research is needed to determine whether initiation of anticoagulation or additional screening supported by PALS measurements will improve clinical outcomes in these patients.