Background: The recent improvement of peroral cholangioscopy (POCS) maneuverability has enabled the precise, targeted biopsy of bile duct lesions under direct cholangioscopic vision. However, as only small-cup biopsy forceps can pass through the scope channel, the resulting small sample size may limit the pathological diagnosis of biopsy specimens. This study compared the diagnostic abilities of POCS-guided biopsy and conventional fluoroscopy-guided biopsy for bile duct cancer. Method: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients exhibiting bile duct stricture with suspected cholangiocarcinoma in whom POCS-guided and fluoroscopy-guided biopsies were performed in the same session. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic sensitivity for malignancy. The size and quality of the biopsy specimens were also compared. Result: A total of 59 patients were enrolled. The sensitivity of POCS-guided biopsy was similar to that of fluoroscopy-guided biopsy (54.0% and 64.0%, respectively). However, when the modalities were combined, the sensitivity increased to 80.0%. The mean specimen size from POCS-guided biopsy was significantly smaller than that from fluoroscopy-guided biopsy. The specimen quality using fluoroscopy-guided biopsy was also better than that using POCS-guided biopsy. Conclusions: The diagnostic sensitivity of POCS-guided biopsy is still insufficient, mainly because of the limited specimen quantity and quality. Therefore, conventional fluoroscopy-guided biopsy would be helpful to improve diagnostic sensitivity.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a well-established procedure for diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses. This technique is highly accurate and safe and can be performed uneventfully in most cases. However, factors such as unstable scope position, inappropriate location of the lesion, lesion mobility, and lesion characteristics may complicate the procedure. To overcome such difficulties, it is necessary to select the most suitable needle and consider several technical points according to each situation. We introduce our standard technique for EUS-FNA and provide several tips for ensuring a successful procedure.

Introduction. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with surgically altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy (SAA) is generally challenging despite the use of enteroscopy. After failed biliary cannulation, rendezvous technique (RV) can be an option to assist the biliary access. However, proper needle puncture of biliary ducts, which is critical in the RV procedure, can be difficult because of insufficient biliary dilation. By contrast, the gallbladder can be punctured as a possible access route for RV. Aim. To evaluate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous transgallbladder (PTGB)-RV in patients with SAA. Patients and methods. Six patients who underwent PTGB-RV were included. PTGB drainage was performed in cases without sufficient biliary duct dilation. A guidewire was inserted through the PTGB route with antegrade passage through the cystic duct, common bile duct and duodenal papilla. An enteroscope was inserted up to the papilla, at the guidewire exit site. The guidewire was pulled out through the accessory channel followed by biliary cannulation over the guidewire and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) for stone removal. Results. Six patients with SAA (Roux-en-Y in 4 and Billroth-II in 2) underwent PTGB-RV for removal of bile duct stones. In all patients, a guidewire was successfully inserted into the duodenum followed by insertion of the enteroscope and biliary cannulation. EPBD was then performed, but subsequent stone removal failed in 1 patient. Stone removal was successful in 5 patients without complication, except 1 case of mild pancreatitis. Conclusion. PTGB-RV seems to be a feasible and relatively safe salvage technique in patients with SAA.