Manoj Karkee

Prof. Dr. Manoj Karkee

Department of Biosystems Engineering, Center for Precision and Automated Agricultural Systems, Washington State University, 24106 N, Bunn Road, Prosser, WA 99350, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 June 2025 in Artificial Intelligence Review
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRanjan Sapkota
Ranjan Sapkota
MFMarco Flores-Calero
Marco Flores-Calero
RQRizwan Qureshi
Rizwan Qureshi
CBChetan Badgujar
Chetan Badgujar
UNUpesh Nepal
Upesh Nepal
MKManoj Karkee
Manoj Karkee
This review systematically examines the progression of the You Only Look Once (YOLO) object detection algorithms from YOLOv1 to the recently unveiled YOLOv12. Employing a reverse chronological analysis, this study examines the advancements introduced by YOLO algorithms, beginning with YOLOv12 and progressing through YOLO11 (or YOLOv11), YOLOv10, YOLOv9, YOLOv8, and subsequent versions to explore each version’s contributions to enhancing speed, detection accuracy, and computational efficiency in real-time object detection. Additionally, this study reviews the alternative versions derived from YOLO architectural advancements of YOLO-NAS, YOLO-X, YOLO-R, DAMO-YOLO, and Gold-YOLO. Moreover, the study highlights the transformative impact of YOLO models across five critical application areas: autonomous vehicles and traffic safety, healthcare and medical imaging, industrial manufacturing, surveillance and security, and agriculture. By detailing the incremental technological advancements in subsequent YOLO versions, this review chronicles the evolution of YOLO, and discusses the challenges and limitations in each of the earlier versions. The evolution signifies a path towards integrating YOLO with multimodal, context-aware, and Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) systems for the next YOLO decade, promising significant implications for future developments in AI-driven applications.

28 April 2017 in Journal of Field Robotics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAbhisesh Silwal
Abhisesh Silwal
JDJoseph R. Davidson
Joseph R. Davidson
MKManoj Karkee
Manoj Karkee
CMChangki Mo
Changki Mo
Qin ZhangQin Zhang
Qin Zhang
KLKaren Lewis
Karen Lewis

22 August 2025 in Information Fusion
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RSRanjan Sapkota
Ranjan Sapkota
KRKonstantinos I. Roumeliotis
Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis
MKManoj Karkee
Manoj Karkee

20 July 2025 in SuperIntelligence - Robotics - Safety & Alignment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRanjan Sapkota
Ranjan Sapkota
KRKonstantinos I. Roumeliotis
Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis
MKManoj Karkee
Manoj Karkee
This review critically distinguishes between AI Agents and Agentic AI, offering a structured, conceptual taxonomy, application mapping, and analysis of opportunities and challenges to clarify their divergent design philosophies and capabilities. We begin by outlining the search strategy and foundational definitions, characterizing AI Agents as modular systems driven and enabled by LLMs and LIMs for taskspecific automation. Generative AI is positioned as a precursor providing the foundation, with AI agents advancing through tool integration, prompt engineering, and reasoning enhancements. We then characterize Agentic AI systems, which, in contrast to AI Agents, represent a paradigm shift marked by multi-agent collaboration, dynamic task decomposition, persistent memory, and coordinated autonomy. Through a chronological evaluation of architectural evolution, operational mechanisms, interaction styles, and autonomy levels, we present a comparative analysis across both AI agents and agentic AI paradigms. Application domains enabled by AI Agents such as customer support, scheduling, and data summarization are then contrasted with Agentic AI deployments in research automation, robotic coordination, and medical decision support. We further examine unique challenges in each paradigm including hallucination, brittleness, emergent behavior, and coordination failure, and propose targeted solutions such as ReAct loops, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), automation coordination layers, and causal modeling. This work aims to provide a roadmap for developing robust, scalable, and explainable AI-driven systems.

1 January 2016 in Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGA. Gongal
A. Gongal
ASA. Silwal
A. Silwal
SASuraj Amatya
Suraj Amatya
MKManoj Karkee
Manoj Karkee
QZQ. Zhang
Q. Zhang
KLK. Lewis
K. Lewis

1 June 2016 in Biosystems Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SASuraj Amatya
Suraj Amatya
MKManoj Karkee
Manoj Karkee
AGAleana Gongal
Aleana Gongal
QZQin Zhang
Qin Zhang
MWMatthew D. Whiting
Matthew D. Whiting