Phthalates are reproductive toxicants commonly found in personal care products (PCPs). These endocrine disrupting chemicals are associated with pregnancy complications, including gestational diabetes. Yet, little is known about PCP use as a contributor to urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations in pregnancy. We conducted a pilot study among 108 pregnant participants to examine the associations of self-reported PCP use with 14 phthalate and 2 DINCH (di(isononyl) cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate) metabolite concentrations measured in single spot urine samples during pregnancy (median: 36 weeks of gestation). At the time of urine collection, participants self-reported use of hair products (within the last month) and other PCPs (within the last 48 h). We used linear regression to estimate associations for natural log-transformed, specific gravity-corrected concentrations of common PCP-associated phthalate metabolites (monoethyl phthalate [MEP], mono-n-butyl phthalate [MBP], and mono-isobutyl phthalate [MIBP]) in our primary analyses, and additional phthalate metabolites in secondary analyses. Most urinary metabolites were detected for >90% of participants. Participants who reported using hair oil within the past month had MEP concentrations 125% higher (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.1, 408) than non-users. For other personal care products, we observed the greatest percent difference in PCP-associated metabolites for MIBP among hair gel users (39.3%, 95% CI: -6.3, 107) and for MEP among conditioner/crème rinse users (-55.4%, 95% CI: -76.4, -15.6) compared to non-users. Findings suggest that self-reported use of hair oils during late pregnancy may be associated with higher urinary concentrations of MEP. Hair gel use in late pregnancy may also be associated with higher urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations, while conditioner/crème rinse use may be associated with lower levels if MEP.

Background: Prenatal endocrine disrupting chemical (EDC) exposure has been associated with increased risk of preterm birth. Non-Hispanic Black women have higher incidence of preterm birth compared to other racial/ethnic groups and may be disproportionately exposed to EDCs through EDC-containing hair products. However, research on the use of EDC-associated hair products during pregnancy and risk of preterm birth is lacking. Therefore, the objective of this pilot study was to estimate associations of prenatal hair product use with gestational age at delivery in a Boston, Massachusetts area pregnancy cohort. Methods: The study population consisted of a subset of participants enrolled in the Environmental Reproductive and Glucose Outcomes (ERGO) Study between 2018 and 2020. We collected self-reported data on demographics and hair product use using a previously validated questionnaire at four prenatal visits (median: 12, 19, 26, 36 weeks’ gestation) and abstracted gestational age at delivery from medical records. We compared gestational age and hair product use by race/ethnicity and used linear regression to estimate covariate-adjusted associations of product use and frequency of use at each study visit with gestational age at delivery. Primary models were adjusted for maternal age at enrollment and delivery method. Results: Of the 154 study participants, 7% delivered preterm. Non-Hispanic Black participants had lower mean gestational age at delivery compared to non-Hispanic White participants (38.2 vs. 39.2 weeks) and were more likely to report ever and more frequent use of hair products. In regression models, participants reporting daily use of hair oils at visit 4 had lower mean gestational age at delivery compared to non-users (β: -8.3 days; 95% confidence interval: -14.9, -1.6). We did not find evidence of associations at earlier visits or with other products. Conclusions: Frequent use of hair oils during late pregnancy may be associated with shorter gestational duration. As hair oils are more commonly used by non-Hispanic Black women and represent potentially modifiable EDC exposure sources, this may have important implications for the known racial disparity in preterm birth.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists provided updated guidance in 2021, recommending that reproductive health professionals should include discussion of environmental exposures with their patients. However, environmental health is seldom included in medical training, with endocrine-disrupting chemicals, such as phthalates—linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes—being among the least discussed. We developed a one-hour virtual educational intervention to train reproductive health professionals on the routes of phthalate exposure, potential associated health impacts, and suggestions on how to discuss exposure reduction with patients. The intervention was designed to include perspectives from patients, scientists, and clinicians. Using a pre/post/post design, we evaluated the impact of the intervention on reproductive health professionals’ phthalate-related reproductive health literacy via a validated environmental health literacy (EHL) scale, their confidence in discussing phthalates, and the frequency of discussions about phthalates with patients. All materials, including the study questionnaires and intervention materials, were administered virtually to reproductive health professionals (n = 203) currently seeing patients working in the United States. After completing the intervention, reproductive health professionals’ average EHL increased (pre-course: 22.3, post-course: 23.7, 2 months post-course: 24.0), as did their confidence in discussing phthalates with their patients (pre-course: 1% (2/203) reported being quite confident, post-course: 64% (131/203) reported being quite confident, and 2 months post course: 86% (174/203) reported being quite confident). Additionally, the reported frequency of discussions about phthalates with patients rose substantially (pre-course: 0% (0/203) reported usually discussing phthalates with patients, and 2 months post-course: 86% (175/203) reported usually discussing phthalates with patients): In line with the recommendations of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, this online phthalate educational intervention tool increased EHL among reproductive health professionals and shifted clinical care to include discussion about phthalates, a reproductive toxicant.

Personal care products frequently contain endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) including parabens and phthalates, which can alter glucose metabolism. The postpartum period is a time of rapid metabolic change, but whether EDC-associated product use impacts postpartum glucose metabolism is unknown. We included 270 participants from the Boston, MA-based Environmental Reproductive and Glucose Outcomes (ERGO) pregnancy cohort with data on self-reported personal care product use at ≤4 pregnancy visits (median: 11, 19, 26, 36 weeks of gestation) and 1 postpartum visit (median: 9 weeks). We quantified postpartum hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting insulin, fasting- and 2-h glucose post-75-g oral glucose tolerance test, and calculated homeostatic model assessment for insulin sensitivity (HOMA2-S) and beta-cell function (HOMA2-B). Using covariate-adjusted linear regression, we estimated visit-specific associations of product use with postpartum glycemic outcomes. Associations of product use with postpartum glycemic measures were mixed. Users of certain hair products had lower postpartum insulin sensitivity compared to non-users (e.g., Visit1 hair gel/spray: 22.8% difference [95% CI: 39.2, -1.9] in mean HOMA2-S). Conversely, users of products like deodorant, liquid- and bar soap, had higher insulin sensitivity and lower glucose levels (e.g., postpartum deodorant: 32.1% difference [95% CI: 7.0, 63.1] in mean HOMA2-S; -3.1 mg/dL [95% CI: 6.3, -0.04] mean fasting glucose). Associations with other products were inconsistent across timepoints or null. Use of certain personal care products during the perinatal period was associated with altered postpartum glucose metabolism. Larger studies are needed to understand the impacts of product use patterns on glycemic outcomes.