Thotsapol Chaianunporn

Dr. Thotsapol Chaianunporn

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2012 in Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCThotsapol Chaianunporn
Thotsapol Chaianunporn
THT. Hovestadt
T. Hovestadt
Theoretical studies on the evolution of dispersal in metacommunities are rare despite empirical evidence suggesting that interspecific interactions can modify dispersal behaviour of organisms. To understand the role of species interactions for dispersal evolution, we utilize an individual‐based model of a metacommunity where local population dynamics follows a stochastic version of theNicholson–Bailey model and dispersal probability is an evolving trait. Our results show that in comparison with a neutral system (commensalism), parasitism promotes dispersal of hosts and parasites, while mutualism tends to reduce dispersal in both partners. Search efficiency of guests (only in the case of parasitism), dispersal mortality and external extinction risk can influence the evolution of dispersal of all partners. In systems composed of two host and two guest species, lower dispersal probabilities evolve under parasitism as well as mutualism than in one host and one guest species systems. This is because of frequency‐dependent modulations of dispersal benefits emerging in such systems for all partners.

8 June 2015 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TCThotsapol Chaianunporn
Thotsapol Chaianunporn
THThomas Hovestadt
Thomas Hovestadt

1 December 2012 in Ecological Modelling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TCThotsapol Chaianunporn
Thotsapol Chaianunporn
THThomas Hovestadt
Thomas Hovestadt

15 November 2024 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCThotsapol Chaianunporn
Thotsapol Chaianunporn
Thitipong PanthumThitipong Panthum
Thitipong Panthum
Worapong SingchatWorapong Singchat
Worapong Singchat
KCKanokporn Chaianunporn
Kanokporn Chaianunporn
WSWarong Suksavate
Warong Suksavate
Kornsorn SrikulnathKornsorn Srikulnath
Kornsorn Srikulnath
The invasion of blackchin tilapia in Thailand is a critical ecological threat affecting native biodiversity and destabilizing ecosystems. It is also resulting in significant ecological and socio-economic impacts. Originally from West Africa and introduced globally for aquaculture, blackchin tilapia thrive in Thailand’s brackish and freshwater ecosystems because of their high reproductive rates, environmental adaptability, and trophic plasticity. This review evaluates potential solutions for the invasion of blackchin tilapia in Thailand from a scientific perspective. The successful invasion of blackchin tilapia in Thailand can be attributed to several key factors, including late detection of the species, the delayed government response, the absence of effective management strategies, and the species’ high invasive potential. Given its wide distribution, large population size, and high reproductive rate, the eradication of the entire blackchin tilapia population is unlikely. Management efforts should focus on containment and impact reduction. Early detection and monitoring at the invasion front remain crucial to limit the species’ spread. Developing an online platform for tracking invasive species would aid these efforts. Public education and outreach are essential for promoting responsible behaviors for preventing further spread. Encouraging the utilization of blackchin tilapia as a food source and for commercial purposes could help suppress its population while supporting local economies. Biological control and other potentially harmful strategies should be avoided unless supported by strong scientific evidence to ensure minimal risks to ecosystems. Scientific research into controlling blackchin tilapia should be encouraged to develop suitable strategies, including using sterile triploid tilapia. The “polluter pays” policy should be implemented to cover the costs associated with invasive species. Coordinated efforts between researchers, policymakers, and the public are crucial for formulating effective management strategies to promote a balance between economic benefits and long-term environmental sustainability.

1 January 2015
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RNRinrapee Ngamsang
Rinrapee Ngamsang
CPChotima Potisap
Chotima Potisap
ABAtcha Boonmee
Atcha Boonmee
PLPhrueksa Lawongsa
Phrueksa Lawongsa
TCThotsapol Chaianunporn
Thotsapol Chaianunporn
RSRasana W Sermswan
Rasana W Sermswan

29 July 2022 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSPattraporn Simla
Pattraporn Simla
TCThotsapol Chaianunporn
Thotsapol Chaianunporn
WSWangworn Sankamethawee
Wangworn Sankamethawee
AHAlice Hughes
Alice Hughes
TSTuanjit Sritongchuay
Tuanjit Sritongchuay
Destruction of natural habitat, land-use changes and biological invasion are some of the major threats to biodiversity. Both habitat alteration and biological invasions can have impacts on pollinator communities and pollination network structures. This study aims to examine the effect of an invasive plant, praxelis (Praxelis clematidea; Asteraceae), and land-use types on pollinator communities and the structure of pollination networks. We conducted the study in smallholder orchards which are either invaded or non-invaded by P. clematidea. We estimated the pollinator richness, visitation rates, and pollinator diversity and evaluated the network structures from 18 smallholder orchards in Northeastern Thailand. The effect of landscape structure in the vicinity of the orchards was investigated, with the proportion of agricultural, forest, and urban landscape within a 3 km radius analyzed. The invasive species and land-use disturbance influence the pollinator communities and pollination network structure at species level was affected by the presence of P. clematidea. Bees were the most important pollinator group for pollinator communities and pollination networks of both invaded or non-invaded plots, as bees are a generalist species, they provide the coherence of both the network and its own module. The urban landscape had a strong negative influence on pollinator richness, while the proportions of agriculture and forest landscape positively affected the pollinator community.