Clarence Choi

Dr. Clarence Choi


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 March 2019 in Landslides
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YCYIFEI CUI
YIFEI CUI
Deqiang ChengDeqiang Cheng
Deqiang Cheng
CCClarence Choi
Clarence Choi
WJWen Jin
Wen Jin
YWYun Pu Wu
Yun Pu Wu
JKJeffrey S. Kargel
Jeffrey S. Kargel
Urbanization has been linked to destructive geo-hazards that can cause loss of life, destruction of property, and environmental damage. On August 14, 2017, a devastating geo-hazard chain—a debris slide, debris flow, and sediment-laden flood—in Freetown, Sierra Leone resulted in at least 500 deaths and over 600 missing persons and the destruction of hundreds of houses. This study uses 10 years of high-resolution satellite images to conduct a remote sensing analysis of the disaster. Although rainfall was the trigger, rapid and haphazard urbanization acted to increase both hazard and vulnerability. Specifically, poor urban planning with inadequate consideration of risk led to housing construction in dangerous areas; clearance of hillside vegetation increased erosion potential; very low cost buildings using frail construction material and methods lacked resilience; and insufficient risk management led to weak emergency response.

1 June 2019 in Geomorphology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GZGordon G.D. Zhou
Gordon G.D. Zhou
MZMingjun Zhou
Mingjun Zhou
MSMandira Singh Shrestha
Mandira Singh Shrestha
DSDongri Song
Dongri Song
CCClarence Choi
Clarence Choi
HCHuayong Chen
Huayong Chen

1 October 2017 in Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSD. Song
D. Song
CNC.W.W. Ng
C.W.W. Ng
CCClarence Choi
Clarence Choi
GZG.G.D. Zhou
G.G.D. Zhou
JKJ.S.H. Kwan
J.S.H. Kwan
RKR.C.H. Koo
R.C.H. Koo
The dynamics of debris flows are fundamentally governed by the interaction between the solid and fluid phases. However, current approaches used to estimate impact load treat debris flow as an equivalent fluid without considering solid–fluid interaction separately from other factors. In this study, a series of centrifuge tests was carried out to investigate the influence of interaction between solid and fluid phases on single-surge debris flow impact on a rigid barrier. The effect of solid–fluid interaction was studied by varying the solid fraction of the flows. A model rigid barrier was instrumented to capture induced bending moment and impact pressure. Test results demonstrate that the transition from a pile-up mechanism to a run-up mechanism is governed by the solid fraction and thus the grain contact stresses. The rigid barrier design for the impact with a pile-up mechanism is mainly dominated by the static load. Contrary to the hydrodynamic approach, which assumes that the frontal impact is the most critical, the frontal impact of a run-up mechanism contributes less than 25% of the total force impulse. The consideration of static loading leads to the development of a new impact model with a triangular distribution of the impact pressure.

1 February 2017 in Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CNC.W.W. Ng
C.W.W. Ng
DSD. Song
D. Song
CCClarence Choi
Clarence Choi
LLL.H.D. Liu
L.H.D. Liu
JKJ.S.H. Kwan
J.S.H. Kwan
WPW.K. Pun
W.K. Pun
Structural countermeasures such as rigid and flexible barriers are commonly installed in mountainous regions to intercept mass-wasting processes. Without sufficient and reliable comparable physical data, the study of impact mechanisms remains difficult and not well understood. In this study, a newly developed flexible model barrier together with a rigid barrier are used to simulate either dry granular or viscous liquid impacts on these model barriers in a geotechnical centrifuge. The novel flexible barrier is made of four instrumented cables controlled by spring mechanisms to replicate a bilinear prototype loading response. Tests revealed that regardless of barrier type, both dry granular and viscous flows could have similar frontal dynamic impact coefficients around unity. Compared with the kinetic energy of flow mass (∼10 MJ), only 249 kJ of flexible barrier energy capacity was mobilized. This implies that debris-resisting barriers may only be required to intercept the dynamic flow front as the subsequent flow energy may mainly be dissipated through internal shearing. Attributing to the large deformation of the flexible barrier, the granular static load acting on the flexible barrier could be 39% lower than that on the rigid barrier, resulting in an active failure mode and a lower earth pressure.

1 January 2015 in Géotechnique Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCClarence Choi
Clarence Choi
SAS. C. H. Au-Yeung
S. C. H. Au-Yeung
CNC. W. W. Ng
C. W. W. Ng
DSD. Song
D. Song
The heights of rigid debris flow barriers are designed to provide adequate retention and prevent debris from over-spilling. Designers need to predict potential runup height against a vertical wall to account for potential over-spilling. Experimental investigations of debris flow runup have previously been conducted using dry sand. A 5 m long rectangular flume was used to conduct runup experiments using both dry sand and water, separately. A combination of high-speed imagery, photoconductive sensors and laser sensors was used to study runup along the vertical face of a rigid barrier. The effect of Froude number (Fr) on runup was examined by varying the channel inclination. Commonly adopted energy and momentum approaches for predicting runup were compared with experimental results. The results reveal that runup mechanisms are dependent on approach Fr conditions and whether the flow medium is frictional in nature. For water, subcritical flows did not exhibit significant runup (reflective wave mechanism), whereas supercritical flows led to a vertical jet runup mechanism. Supercritical sand flow resulted in a pile-up mechanism instead of distinct runup.

25 January 2018 in Natural Hazards
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YCYifei Cui
Yifei Cui
CCClarence Choi
Clarence Choi
LLLuis H. D. Liu
Luis H. D. Liu
CNCharles W. W. Ng
Charles W. W. Ng