Background: Musculoskeletal disorders significantly affect healthcare professionals, particularly physiotherapists, due to the physical demands of their work. The link between physical ailments and psychological distress is especially prominent in clinical settings. Objectives: To assess the prevalence of work-related low back pain (LBP), stress, anxiety, and depression among physiotherapists in Saudi Arabia, and to identify associated local risk factors. Methods: A cross-sectional study using convenience sampling included 710 licensed physiotherapists across Saudi Arabia. Participants completed an online survey containing demographic data and the validated measures, including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) for psychological distress. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, correlation, and regression analyses. Results: Of 710 responses, 697 were valid; 378 physiotherapists reported work-related LBP. The mean pain intensity was 4.6 (SD = 1.6), with 54.2% experiencing moderate to severe disability. Mental health results showed 49.7% had depressive symptoms and 33.9% experienced some level of anxiety. Significant correlations were observed between disability and psychological distress (anxiety: r = 0.382; depression: r = 0.375; stress: r = 0.406; all p < 0.001). Regression analyses indicated psychological distress significantly predicted disability, with R² values ranging from 0.125 to 0.248, being higher among inpatient physiotherapists. Conclusions: This study reveals a high prevalence of LBP and psychological distress among Saudi physiotherapists, with stress being the strongest predictor of LBP severity. Integrated ergonomic and mental health interventions, including workplace wellness programs and psychological support, are recommended to reduce risks and promote a healthier, more sustainable physiotherapy workforce.

Background: Researchers are prioritizing the development of an effective treatment approach for third-trimester pregnancy-related low back pain (LBP), a prevalent and costly disorder. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the effects of Tui-Na (TN) versus positional release techniques (PRT) on third trimester pregnancy-related LBP. Methods: Fifty pregnant women in their third trimester with low back pain were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups for 4 weeks of prescribed treatment (TN or PRT). The primary outcome was LBP intensity. Secondary outcomes included the Oswestry disability index for back disability and the pressure pain threshold of lumbar tender points. Two-way multivariate analysis of variance was used for the data analysis. Results: Multivariate tests indicated statistically significant effects of group (F = 10.062, P < .001, partial η ² = 0.302), time (F = 473.5, P < .001, partial η ² = 0.953), and group-by-time interactions (F = 4.045, P < .001, partial η ² = 0.148). However, the TN group, when compared to the PRT group, revealed a significant decrease in back disability (P < .001, partial η ² = 0.124) and a significant increase in pressure pain threshold at the Rt and Lt points (P = .02 and .001, partial η ² = 0.055, and 0.108, respectively). Within-group comparisons were significant for all measured variables in both the groups (P < .001). Conclusion: Although both TN and PRT are beneficial treatments for third trimester pregnancy-related LBP, TN leads to more beneficial outcomes.