Stuart Connop

Prof. Stuart Connop

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 January 2021 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMark A. Goddard
Mark A. Goddard
ZDZoe Davies
Zoe Davies
SGSolène Guenat
Solène Guenat
MFMark J. Ferguson
Mark J. Ferguson
JFJessica C. Fisher
Jessica C. Fisher
MDMartin Dallimer
Martin Dallimer

1 January 2016 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CMChloe J. Molineux
Chloe J. Molineux
DNDarryl Newport
Darryl Newport
BABamdad Ayati
Bamdad Ayati
CWChuang Wang
Chuang Wang
SCStuart Connop
Stuart Connop
JGJon E. Green
Jon E. Green

12 April 2016 in Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CNC. Nash
C. Nash
JCJ. Clough
J. Clough
DGD. Gedge
D. Gedge
RLR. Lindsay
R. Lindsay
DNDarryl Newport
Darryl Newport
SCStuart Connop
Stuart Connop
Cities dominated by impervious artificial surfaces can experience a multitude of negative environmental impacts. Restoration of green infrastructure has been identified as a mechanism for increasing urban resilience, enabling cities to transition towards sustainable futures in the face of climate-driven change. Building rooftops represent a viable space for integrating new green infrastructure into high-density urban areas. Urban rooftops also provide prime locations for photovoltaic (PV) systems. There is an increasing recognition that these two technologies can be combined to deliver reciprocal benefits in terms of energy efficiency and biodiversity targets. Scarcity of scientific evaluation of the interaction between PVs and green roofs means that the potential benefits are currently poorly understood. This study documents evidence from a biodiversity monitoring study of a substantial biosolar roof installed in the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park. Vegetation and invertebrate communities were sampled and habitat structure measured in relation to habitat niches on the roof, including PV panels. Ninety-two plant species were recorded on the roof and variation in vegetation structure associated with proximity to PV panels was identified. Almost 50% of target invertebrate species collected were designated of conservation importance. Arthropod distribution varied in relation to habitat niches on the roof. The overall aim of the Main Press Centre building green roof design was to create a mosaic of habitats to enhance biodiversity, and the results of the study suggest that PV panels can contribute to niche diversity on a green roof. Further detailed study is required to fully characterise the effects of PV panel density on biodiversity.

3 February 2019
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
HRHeather Rumble
Heather Rumble
FAFabio Angeoletto
Fabio Angeoletto
SCStuart Connop
Stuart Connop
MGMark A. Goddard
Mark A. Goddard
CNCaroline Nash
Caroline Nash

1 October 2016 in Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DJDEIRDRE JOYCE
DEIRDRE JOYCE
SCStuart Connop
Stuart Connop
KFKaren Foley
Karen Foley
ZNZorica Nedović-Budić
Zorica Nedović-Budić
DNDarryl Newport
Darryl Newport
PVPaula Vandergert
Paula Vandergert

19 October 2010 in Insect Conservation and Diversity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCStuart Connop
Stuart Connop
THTom Hill
Tom Hill
JSJonathan Steer
Jonathan Steer
PSPhil Shaw
Phil Shaw
Abstract.  1. Substantial reductions in the distributional ranges of several species of bumblebee have been recorded in the UK. Loss and fragmentation of suitable foraging and nesting habitat to agricultural intensification is thought to be the main driving force behind declines. 2. Limited knowledge of species ecology means that effective conservation management prescriptions cannot be put into place. 3. Here we investigated the spatial dynamics of two UK Biodiversity Action Plan bumblebee species, Bombus sylvarum and Bombus humilis . For the first time, microsatellite DNA analysis was used to estimate foraging distances in rare bumblebees. 4. Sisterhoods were identified between bees sampled at discrete forage patches within a fragmented landscape. Using these sisterhoods, minimum estimates of maximum and mean foraging distances were calculated from distances separating sister bees. 5. Minimum mean foraging distances were calculated as 475 ± 97 m for B. humilis and 231 ± 58 m for B. sylvarum . Mean distances were significantly greater for B. humilis than B. sylvarum ( P  <   0.001). 6. The differences between the spatial scales that the species were recorded over highlighted a need for further research into the spatial dynamics of rare and more ubiquitous foraging bumblebees.