As an important part of urban green infrastructure, the landscape effect of the urban waterfront green space varies, and sometimes, the green space with an excellent landscape aesthetic value fails to serve the needs of most citizens. This seriously affects the construction of a green ecological civilization and the implementation of the concept of “common prosperity” in China. Based on multi-source data, this study took the Qiantang River Basin as an example, selected 12 representative waterfront green spaces along the river as the research objects, and used qualitative and quantitative analysis methods to determine the landscape aesthetic value of the research area from the different dimensions of space, psychology, and physiology. We examined the relationship between each dimension so as to objectively and comprehensively reflect the landscape value characteristics of the waterfront green space in the study area and provide a reasonable theoretical framework and practical development path for future urban waterfront green space landscape design. We obtained the following results: (1) The results of the spatial dimension research indicated that the spatial value index of the waterfront green space in the study area was three-dimensional space > vertical space > horizontal space, and the overall spatial value was low; Qianjiang Ecological Park obtained the highest value (0.5473), and Urban Balcony Park obtained the lowest value (0.4619). (2) The results of the psychological dimension indicated that people’s perceptions of the waterfront green space in the study area were relatively weak, mainly focusing on visual perception, but the waterfront green space with a relative emotional value greater than one accounted for 75%, and the overall recognition of the landscape was high. (3) The results of the behavioral dimension showed that the overall heat of the waterfront green space in the study area was insufficient (1.3719–7.1583), which was mainly concentrated in low-heat levels, and the population density was unevenly distributed (0.0014–0.0663), which was mainly concentrated in the medium-density level. The main purpose of users was to visit, and they stayed an average of 1.5 h. (4) The results of the coupling coordination analysis of the spatial–psychological–behavioral dimensions showed that the landscape value of the waterfront green space in the study area presented a form of ‘high coupling degree and low coordination degree’.

Climate change has presented considerable challenges in the management of urban forests and trees. Varieties of studies have predicted the potential changes in species distribution by employing single-algorithm species distribution models (SDMs) to investigate the impacts of climate change on plant species. However, there is still limited quantitative research on the impacts of climate change on the suitable distribution ranges of commonly used urban tree species. Therefore, our study aims to optimize traditional SDMs by integrating multiple machine learning algorithms and to propose a framework for identifying suitable distribution ranges of urban trees under climate change. We took Michelia chapensis, a tree species of particular significance in southern China, as a pilot tree species to investigate the evolution of its suitable distribution range in the context of two future climate scenarios (SSP126 and SSP585) across four periods (2030s, 2050s, 2070s, and 2090s). The findings indicated that the ensemble SDM showed strong predictive capacity, with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.95. The suitable area for Michelia chapensis is estimated at 15.9 × 10⁵ km² currently and it will expand in most areas under future climate scenarios according to the projection. However, it will contract in southeastern Yunnan, central Guangdong, the Sichuan Basin, northern Hubei, and Jiangxi, etc. The central location of the current suitable distribution area is located in Hengyang, Hunan (27.36° N, 112.34° E), and is projected to shift westward with climate change in the future. The migration magnitude is positively correlated with the intensity of climate change. These findings provide a scientific basis for the future landscape planning and management of Michelia chapensis. Furthermore, the proposed framework can be seen as a valuable tool for predicting the suitable distribution ranges of urban trees in response to climate change, providing insights for proactive adaptation to climate change in urban planning and landscape management.

The rapid advancement of AI-driven generative design brings new opportunities, but its application in landscape garden design remains limited by two gaps: (1) semantic misalignment between generated images and the designer’s intent, and (2) low-resolution outputs with insufficient details. To address these gaps, we developed GardenDiff, a domain-adapted diffusion model trained via parameter optimization and a specialized landscape garden dataset. Central to this approach is Structured Design Captioning (SDC), a hierarchical annotation system specifically designed for garden design that encodes design elements, style features, and auxiliary scene information. To develop this model, we designed a three-stage experimental framework. In Stage 1, we examined the effects of training caption systems and training resolution on generated landscape garden imagery by controlled experiments. In Stage 2, we conducted joint training across five garden styles (Chinese, Japanese, Mediterranean, Nordic, and English) based on the optimized parameter settings from Stage 1 to construct the GardenDiff model. In Stage 3, we validated the model performance through expert evaluation (N = 36) and public evaluation (N = 136) and analyzed style-specific variations in the generated outcomes. Research results showed that Structured Design Captioning (SDC) improved Spatial Rationale by 19.67–39.46% compared with generic captions, and training at 1536 × 1536 pixels improved image quality by 23.2% compared with 768 × 768-pixel training. GardenDiff trained with these optimized parameters showed notable advantages. Its overall scores (5.06) exceeded those of Stable Diffusion XL base 1.0 (SDXL 1.0) by 16.4% and DreamShaper XL by 22.4%. The model improved across four dimensions, including Design Rationale, Design Professionalism, Design Accuracy, and Design Satisfaction. Our study offers a new model to improve the perspective visualization of generative garden design and provides insights into AI-informed landscape and urban design.