Seth Gale

Dr. Seth Gale

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2018 in The American Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGSeth Gale
Seth Gale
DADiler Acar
Diler Acar
KDKirk R. Daffner
Kirk R. Daffner

16 October 2007 in Cerebral Cortex
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TETobias Egner
Tobias Egner
AEAmit Etkin
Amit Etkin
SGSeth Gale
Seth Gale
JHJoy Hirsch
Joy Hirsch
The human brain protects the processing of task-relevant stimuli from interference (“conflict”) by task-irrelevant stimuli via attentional biasing mechanisms. The lateral prefrontal cortex has been implicated in resolving conflict between competing stimuli by selectively enhancing task-relevant stimulus representations in sensory cortices. Conversely, recent data suggest that conflict from emotional distracters may be resolved by an alternative route, wherein the rostral anterior cingulate cortex inhibits amygdalar responsiveness to task-irrelevant emotional stimuli. Here we tested the proposal of 2 dissociable, distracter-specific conflict resolution mechanisms, by acquiring functional magnetic resonance imaging data during resolution of conflict from either nonemotional or emotional distracters. The results revealed 2 distinct circuits: a lateral prefrontal “cognitive control” system that resolved nonemotional conflict and was associated with enhanced processing of task-relevant stimuli in sensory cortices, and a rostral anterior cingulate “emotional control” system that resolved emotional conflict and was associated with decreased amygdalar responses to emotional distracters. By contrast, activations related to both emotional and nonemotional conflict monitoring were observed in a common region of the dorsal anterior cingulate. These data suggest that the neuroanatomical networks recruited to overcome conflict vary systematically with the nature of the conflict, but that they may share a common conflict-detection mechanism.

1 October 2019 in JAMA Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CDChristopher H. van Dyck
Christopher H. van Dyck
HNHaakon B. Nygaard
Haakon B. Nygaard
KCKewei Chen
Kewei Chen
MDMichael C. Donohue
Michael C. Donohue
RRRema Raman
Rema Raman
SSStephen M. Strittmatter
Stephen M. Strittmatter
In Alzheimer disease, the amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) accumulates in the brain as insoluble plaque and soluble oligomers (Aβo). The early accumulation of Aβ, in turn, triggers synaptic damage, inflammatory reaction, and pathological tau with cognitive impairment. Therapeutic development efforts have concentrated on limiting Aβ cleavage from amyloid precursor protein by secretase inhibition1 or on promoting its clearance by active or passive immunization.2 One alternative approach is to limit the toxic effects of accumulated Aβ rather than its level. Although Aβo can assume a range of different species, evidence has shown that multiple forms of Aβo are damaging, either directly or in concert with microglia.3-13

8 September 2015 in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KDKirk R. Daffner
Kirk R. Daffner
SGSeth Gale
Seth Gale
ABA.M. Barrett
A.M. Barrett
BBBradley F. Boeve
Bradley F. Boeve
ACAnjan Chatterjee
Anjan Chatterjee
DKDaniel I. Kaufer
Daniel I. Kaufer
Objective: To evaluate the evidence basis of single-domain cognitive tests frequently used by behavioral neurologists in an effort to improve the quality of clinical cognitive assessment. Methods: Behavioral Neurology Section members of the American Academy of Neurology were surveyed about how they conduct clinical cognitive testing, with a particular focus on the Neurobehavioral Status Exam (NBSE). In contrast to general screening cognitive tests, an NBSE consists of tests of individual cognitive domains (e.g., memory or language) that provide a more comprehensive diagnostic assessment. Workgroups for each of 5 cognitive domains (attention, executive function, memory, language, and spatial cognition) conducted evidence-based reviews of frequently used tests. Reviews focused on suitability for office-based clinical practice, including test administration time, accessibility of normative data, disease populations studied, and availability in the public domain. Results: Demographic and clinical practice data were obtained from 200 respondents who reported using a wide range of cognitive tests. Based on survey data and ancillary information, between 5 and 15 tests in each cognitive domain were reviewed. Within each domain, several tests are highlighted as being well-suited for an NBSE. Conclusions: We identified frequently used single-domain cognitive tests that are suitable for an NBSE to help make informed choices about clinical cognitive assessment. Some frequently used tests have limited normative data or have not been well-studied in common neurologic disorders. Utilizing standardized cognitive tests, particularly those with normative data based on the individual9s age and educational level, can enhance the rigor and utility of clinical cognitive assessment.

1 December 2018 in The American Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RCRomain Chopard
Romain Chopard
GPGregory Piazza
Gregory Piazza
SGSeth Gale
Seth Gale
UCUmberto Campia
Umberto Campia
IAIda Ehlers Albertsen
Ida Ehlers Albertsen
SGSamuel Z. Goldhaber
Samuel Z. Goldhaber

1 April 2021 in The American Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GRGretchen O. Reynolds
Gretchen O. Reynolds
KWKim Willment
Kim Willment
SGSeth Gale
Seth Gale