Background: Levels of chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and neurotransmitter availability are altered in depressed patients and can be used as biological markers. This study aimed to analyze these markers in female Wistar rats under chronic inflammation induced by E. coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS), treated with aqueous extract of A. gratissima and rutin, the major flavonoid of its extract. Methods: Thirty female Wistar rats under a chronic inflammatory regimen induced by 1 mg/kg i.p. of LPS were divided into six experimental groups: control (1), treated with fluoxetine 5 mg/kg (2), rutin at 50 mg/kg (3) or 100 mg/kg (4), aqueous extract of A. gratissima 100 mg/kg (5), and co-treatment with 50 mg/kg of extract and 10 mg/kg of rutin (6). Treatments were administered by gavage for 15 days. Results: Oxidative damage to proteins and lipids was lower in group 6 compared to group 2. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines increased in group 1 but not in group 2, indicating a relationship with depression. Similar effects were observed in the treated groups, showing no significant differences from group 2. Neurotransmitter levels of dopamine and serotonin were low in group 1, and all treatments effectively increased them. Additionally, A. gratissima extract at 100 ppm increased locomotor activity in planarians. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of the LPS induction model in subacute experimental designs and the potential antidepressant effect of the treatments due to their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, and ability to increase neurotransmitter levels.
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of C. sinensis extract, orlistat, and their combination on biochemical, hormonal, inflammatory, and oxidative stress parameters in female rats. The extract was characterized by the presence of citric acid, ferulic acid, and quercetin, along with antioxidant activity. Five experimental groups were established: (1) control; (2) obese; (3) orlistat (1.72 mg/kg); (4) C. sinensis extract (7.15 mg/kg); (5) a combination of both treatments. Treatment with the extract, orlistat, or their combination resulted in biochemical parameters (glucose, cholesterol, and triglycerides) that were comparable to the control group and significantly different from the obese group. Notably, only the C. sinensis extract alone restored pro-inflammatory cytokine levels (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8) to values similar to the control. All treatments improved the activity of antioxidant enzymes catalase and glutathione peroxidase, while a significant increase in superoxide dismutase activity was observed only in the extract group. Among the oxidative damage markers, TBARS was the most responsive to treatment, whereas protein carbonylation was less affected. Histological analysis showed that all treatments promoted structural normalization. These results provide a rationale for further pre-clinical and clinical investigations into the use of C. sinensis extract as an adjunctive therapy for metabolic disorders.
Background: In 2019, a new virus caused by SARS-CoV-2, called COVID-19, spread throughout the world, causing a pandemic state. As the pandemic progressed and cases continued to increase, safe vaccines were developed for the entire population. In Brazil, AstraZeneca® (ChAdOx1-S) and Pfizer® (BNT162b2) vaccines were among those administered to the population. Objectives: The objective of this study was to analyze whether immunoglobulin G (IgG) is produced for COVID-19 in individuals immunized with two doses of AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1-S) and Pfizer (BNT162b2) vaccines and to evaluate several parameters in order to understand how our bodies respond to this immunization. Methods: The study involved the participation of 120 individuals: 49 in the control group, 44 vaccinated with the AstraZeneca vaccine, and 27 the vaccinated with Pfizer vaccine. Results: Hematological, biochemical, inflammatory, and oxidant/antioxidant parameters and the production of IgG antibodies were analyzed. An increase in some inflammatory parameters was observed in vaccinated individuals, which may have been caused by an immune reaction after vaccination. In terms of hematological parameters, the changes caused by vaccination appear to be transient and quickly resolved after immunization. In terms of biochemical parameters, an increase in IgG antibodies was observed in the group vaccinated with the Pfizer® vaccine; however, the AstraZeneca® and control groups also produced IgG, although to a lesser extent. In terms of the remaining parameters, there was little change after vaccination. Regarding the levels of oxidants/antioxidants, it was observed that there was a compensation by antioxidants due to the increase in oxidant parameters, which may act as corrective mechanism. Conclusions: Both the AstraZeneca® and Pfizer® vaccines induced anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG production, accompanied by inflammatory, hematological, and oxidative changes.