Michael J. Jorgensen

Prof. Michael J. Jorgensen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 December 2005 in Ergonomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MJMichael J. Jorgensen
Michael J. Jorgensen
KDKermit Davis
Kermit Davis
SKSusan Kotowski
Susan Kotowski
PAPranathi Aedla
Pranathi Aedla
KDKari Dunning
Kari Dunning
Job rotation has been advocated as a suitable intervention to control work-related musculoskeletal disorders. However, little is known regarding the prevalence of job rotation, methods used to identify jobs for rotation or the benefits or limitations of job rotation. A web-based questionnaire was developed to survey job rotation practices from Midwest US manufacturing companies. Results indicated that 42.7% of the companies contacted used job rotation, where the median time for which they had used job rotation was 5 years. Job rotation was used mainly to reduce exposure to risk factors for work-related injuries and to reduce work related injuries, whereas supervisor decisions and ergonomic analyses were used to select jobs for the rotation scheme. Major limitations to successful implementation of job rotation included rotation of individuals with medical restrictions, decreased product quality and lack of jobs to rotate to. These findings suggest that further study is needed to determine if exposure to risk factors is reduced through current efforts.

1 May 2003 in Clinical Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MJMichael J. Jorgensen
Michael J. Jorgensen
WMW.S. Marras
W.S. Marras
PGP. Gupta
P. Gupta

1 September 2003 in The Spine Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MJMichael J. Jorgensen
Michael J. Jorgensen
WMWilliam S Marras
William S Marras
PGPurnendu Gupta
Purnendu Gupta
TWThomas R Waters
Thomas R Waters

1 January 1997 in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WMWilliam S. Marras
William S. Marras
KGKevin P. Granata
Kevin P. Granata
KDKermit George Davis
Kermit George Davis
W. Gary AllreadW. Gary Allread
W. Gary Allread
MJMichael J. Jorgensen
Michael J. Jorgensen

22 June 2005 in Ergonomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MJMichael J. Jorgensen
Michael J. Jorgensen
AHAmit Handa
Amit Handa
PVPrabaharan Veluswamy
Prabaharan Veluswamy
MBManish Bhatt
Manish Bhatt
Intervention research for prevention of occupational low back injuries has focused on the effects of reducing extreme torso flexion and the external moment. Little is known about prevention strategies for torso twisting and lateral bending. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of pallet distance with regard to a constant lift origin on the torso kinematics and a measure of low back disorder risk. Fifteen male participants transferred 11.3 kg boxes from a constant origin to six different regions on a pallet. Two pallet distances with regard to the lift origin were investigated. ANOVA indicated that increasing the pallet distance resulted in increases in torso kinematics (velocities and accelerations) as well as a measure of risk of low back disorder. The increases in torso kinematics (e.g. twisting and lateral awkward postures and bending velocities) occurred mostly at the lower height regions on the pallet. It is concluded that increasing the pallet distance with regard to the lifting origin, with the intention to influence the participant to take a step during a palletizing task does not appear to be an effective intervention strategy to reduce the risk of low back disorder associated with torso kinematics.