Sarah Chambliss

Sarah Chambliss


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 April 2021 in Science Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CTChristopher W. Tessum
Christopher W. Tessum
DPDavid A. Paolella
David A. Paolella
SCSarah Chambliss
Sarah Chambliss
JAJoshua S. Apte
Joshua S. Apte
JHJason D. Hill
Jason D. Hill
JMJulian D. Marshall
Julian D. Marshall
Nearly all major emission categories contribute to the systemic PM 2.5 exposure disparity experienced by people of color.

24 October 2018 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KMKyle P. Messier
Kyle P. Messier
SCSarah Chambliss
Sarah Chambliss
SGShahzad Gani
Shahzad Gani
RARamon Alvarez
Ramon Alvarez
MBMichael Brauer
Michael Brauer
JAJoshua S. Apte
Joshua S. Apte
Air pollution measurements collected through systematic mobile monitoring campaigns can provide outdoor concentration data at high spatial resolution. We explore approaches to minimize data requirements for mapping a city’s air quality using mobile monitors with “data-only” versus predictive modeling approaches. We equipped two Google Street View cars with 1-Hz instruments to collect nitric oxide (NO) and black carbon (BC) measurements in Oakland, CA. We explore two strategies for efficiently mapping spatial air quality patterns through Monte Carlo analyses. First, we explore a “data-only” approach where we attempt to minimize the number of repeated visits needed to reliably estimate concentrations for all roads. Second, we combine our data with a land use regression-kriging (LUR-K) model to predict at unobserved locations; here, measurements from only a subset of roads or repeat visits are considered. Although LUR-K models did not capture the full variability of on-road concentrations, models trained with minimal data consistently captured important covariates and general spatial air pollution trends, with cross-validation R2 for log-transformed NO and BC of 0.65 and 0.43. Data-only mapping performed poorly with few (1–2) repeated drives but obtained better cross-validation R2 than the LUR-K approach within 4 to 8 repeated drive days per road segment.

7 September 2021 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCSarah Chambliss
Sarah Chambliss
CPCarlos P.R. Pinon
Carlos P.R. Pinon
KMKyle P. Messier
Kyle P. Messier
BLBrian LaFranchi
Brian LaFranchi
CUCrystal Romeo Upperman
Crystal Romeo Upperman
JAJoshua S. Apte
Joshua S. Apte
Disparity in air pollution exposure arises from variation at multiple spatial scales: along urban-to-rural gradients, between individual cities within a metropolitan region, within individual neighborhoods, and between city blocks. Here, we improve on existing capabilities to systematically compare urban variation at several scales, from hyperlocal (10 km), and to assess consequences for outdoor air pollution experienced by residents of different races and ethnicities, by creating a set of uniquely extensive and high-resolution observations of spatially variable pollutants: NO, NO2, black carbon (BC), and ultrafine particles (UFP). We conducted full-coverage monitoring of a wide sample of urban and suburban neighborhoods (93 km2 and 450,000 residents) in four counties of the San Francisco Bay Area using Google Street View cars equipped with the Aclima mobile platform. Comparing scales of variation across the sampled population, greater differences arise from localized pollution gradients for BC and NO (pollutants dominated by primary sources) and from regional gradients for UFP and NO2 (pollutants dominated by secondary contributions). Median concentrations of UFP, NO, and NO2 are, for Hispanic and Black populations, 8 to 30% higher than the population average; for White populations, average exposures to these pollutants are 9 to 14% lower than the population average. Systematic racial/ethnic disparities are influenced by regional concentration gradients due to sharp contrasts in demographic composition among cities and urban districts, while within-group extremes arise from local peaks. Our results illustrate how detailed and extensive fine-scale pollution observations can add new insights about differences and disparities in air pollution exposures at the population scale. Significance It is known, to researchers and heavily impacted communities, that people of color face a higher average burden of air pollution. It was unknown whether racial/ethnic disparities were caused by spatial heterogeneities at the level of city blocks, neighborhoods, or urban regions. Our approach leverages a unique set of highly local observations, covering every city block of 13 cities and urban districts that are home to 450,000 people. We find that even for pollutants with steep localized gradients, differences in average outdoor concentrations among racial/ethnic groups are driven by regional variability. However, localized peaks indicate opportunities to reduce extremes within groups. The methods and findings of this study can inform strategies to reduce disparities in urban air pollution exposure.

19 June 2018 in Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DPDavid A. Paolella
David A. Paolella
CTChristopher W. Tessum
Christopher W. Tessum
PAPeter J. Adams
Peter J. Adams
JAJoshua Schulz Apte
Joshua Schulz Apte
SCSarah Chambliss
Sarah Chambliss
JMJulian D. Marshall
Julian D. Marshall

11 June 2020 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSarah Chambliss
Sarah Chambliss
CPChelsea Preble
Chelsea Preble
JCJulien J. Caubel
Julien J. Caubel
TCTroy Cados
Troy Cados
KMKyle P. Messier
Kyle P. Messier
JAJoshua S. Apte
Joshua S. Apte

1 September 2014 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Stuart BattermanStuart Batterman
Stuart Batterman
SCSarah Chambliss
Sarah Chambliss
Vlad IsakovVlad Isakov
Vlad Isakov