Introduction: The incidence of venous thromboembolism is estimated to be around 3% of cancer patients. However, a majority of incidental pulmonary embolism (iPE) can be overlooked by radiologists in asymptomatic patients, performing CT scans for disease surveillance, which may significantly impact the patient’s health and management. Routine imaging in oncology is usually reviewed with delayed hours after the acquisition of images. Nevertheless, the advent of AI in radiology could reduce the risk of the diagnostic delay of iPE by an optimal triage immediately at the acquisition console. This study aimed to determine the accuracy rate of an AI algorithm (CINA-iPE) in detecting iPE and the duration until the management of cancer patients in our center, in addition to describing the characteristics of patients with a confirmed pulmonary embolism (PE). Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the role of Avicenna’s CE-certified and FDA-cleared CINA-iPE algorithm in oncology patients treated at Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus. The results obtained from the AI algorithm were compared with the attending radiologist’s report and were analyzed by both a radiology resident and a senior radiologist. In case of any discordant results, the reason for this discrepancy was further investigated. The duration between the exact time of the CT scan and analysis was assessed, as well as the duration from the result’s report and the start of active management. Results: Out of 3047 patients, 104 alerts were detected for iPE (prevalence of 1.3%), while 2942 had negative findings. In total, 36 of the 104 patients had confirmed PE, while 68 alerts were false positives. Only one patient reported as negative by the AI tool was deemed to have a PE by the radiologist. The sensitivity and specificity of the AI model were 97.3% and 97.74%, while the PPV and NPV were 34.62% and 99.97%, respectively. Most causes of FP were artifacts (22 cases, 32.3%) and lymph nodes (11 cases, 16.2%). Seven patients experienced delayed diagnosis, requiring them to return to the ER for treatment after being sent home following their scan. The remaining patients received prompt care immediately after their testing, with a mean delay time of 8.13 h. Conclusions: The addition of an AI system for the detection of unsuspected PEs on chest CT scans in routine oncology care demonstrated a promising efficacy in comparison to human performance. Despite a low prevalence, the sensitivity and specificity of the AI tool reached 97.3% and 97.7%, respectively, with detection of all the reported clinical PEs, except one single case. This study describes the potential synergy between AI and radiologists for an optimal diagnosis of iPE in routine clinical cancer care. Clinical relevance statement: In the oncology field, iPEs are common, with an increased risk of morbidity when missed with a delayed diagnosis. With the assistance of a reliable AI tool, the radiologist can focus on the challenging analysis of oncology results while dealing with urgent diagnosis such as PE by sending the patient straight to the ER (Emergency Room) for prompt treatment.

The pathologies and lesions affecting the sesamoid bones of the hallux are uncommon and can be easily overlooked. Among them, sesamoiditis is a relatively rare condition known to cause severe great toe pain; lack of awareness of this particular entity leads to misdiagnosis, delayed treatment, and contributes to significant morbidity. Herein, we present a chronic sesamoiditis case occurring on a medial bipartite sesamoid bone, presenting as chronic great toe pain. The main purpose of this work is to discuss the role of magnetic resonance imaging and X-rays in the diagnosis process. To the best of our knowledge, no cases of great toe sesamoiditis occurring on a bipartite bone in no-athletic patients have yet been reported.

The incidence of venous thromboembolism is estimated at around 3% of cancer patients. However, a majority of incidental pulmonary embolism (iPE) can be overlooked by radiologists in asymptomatic patients, performing CT scans for disease surveillance, which may significantly impact the patient's health and management. Routine imaging in oncology is usually reviewed with delayed hours after the acquisition of images. Nevertheless, the advent of AI in radiology could reduce the risk of diagnostic delay of iPE by an optimal triage immediately at the acquisition console. This study aimed to determine the accuracy rate of an AI algorithm (CIN A-iPE) in detecting iPE and the duration until the management of cancer patients in our center in addition to describing the characteristics of patients with a confirmed pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of the role of Avicenna's CE-certified and FDA-cleared CINA-iPE algorithm in oncology patients treated at Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus. The results obtained from the AI algorithm were compared with the attending radiologist's report and analyzed by both a radiology resident and a senior radiologist. In case of any discordant results, the reason for this discrepancy was further investigated. The duration between the exact time of the CT scan and analysis was assessed as well as the duration from the result’s reporting and the start of active management. RESULTS Out of 3047 patients, 104 alerts were detected for iPE (prevalence of 1.3%) while 2942 had negative findings. 36 of the 104 patients had confirmed PE while 68 alerts were false positives. Only one patient reported as negative by the AI tool was deemed to have a PE by the radiologist. The sensitivity and specificity of the AI model were 97.3% and 97.74% while the PPV and NPV were 34.62% and 99.97% respectively. Most causes of FP were artifacts (22 cases, 32.3%) and lymph nodes (11 cases, 16.2%). Seven patients experienced delayed diagnosis, requiring them to return to the ER for treatment after being sent home following their scan. The remaining patients received prompt care immediately after their testing with a mean delay time of 8.13 hours. CONCLUSION The addition of an AI system for the detection of unsuspected PEs on chest CT scans in routine oncology care demonstrated a promising efficacy in comparison to human performance. Despite a low prevalence, the sensitivity and specificity of the AI tool reached 97.3% and 97.7% respectively with detection of all the reported clinical PEs except one single case. This study describes the potential synergy between AI and radiologists for an optimal diagnosis of iPE in routine clinical cancer care.

Purpose: Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are the most prevalent skeletal manifestations of osteoporosis in cancer patients. Yet, they are frequently missed or not reported in routine clinical radiology, adversely impacting patient outcomes and quality of life. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of a deep-learning (DL)-based application and its potential to reduce the miss rate of incidental VCFs in a high-risk cancer population. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analysed thoraco-abdomino-pelvic (TAP) CT scans from 1556 patients with stage IV cancer collected consecutively over a 4-month period (September–December 2023) in a tertiary cancer center. A DL-based application flagged cases positive for VCFs, which were subsequently reviewed by two expert radiologists for validation. Additionally, grade 3 fractures identified by the application were independently assessed by two expert interventional radiologists to determine their eligibility for vertebroplasty. Results: Of the 1556 cases, 501 were flagged as positive for VCF by the application, with 436 confirmed as true positives by expert review, yielding a positive predictive value (PPV) of 87%. Common causes of false positives included sclerotic vertebral metastases, scoliosis, and vertebrae misidentification. Notably, 83.5% (364/436) of true positive VCFs were absent from radiology reports, indicating a substantial non-report rate in routine practice. Ten grade 3 fractures were overlooked or not reported by radiologists. Among them, 9 were deemed suitable for vertebroplasty by expert interventional radiologists. Conclusion: This study underscores the potential of DL-based applications to improve the detection of VCFs. The analyzed tool can assist radiologists in detecting more incidental vertebral fractures in adult cancer patients, optimising timely treatment and reducing associated morbidity and economic burden. Moreover, it might enhance patient access to interventional treatments such as vertebroplasty. These findings highlight the transformative role that DL can play in optimising clinical management and outcomes for osteoporosis-related VCFs in cancer patients.