Drug assessment by a Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee: from drug selection criteria to use in clinical practice Ana Lozano-Blázquez,1 Cecilia Calvo-Pita,2 Mónica Carbajales-Álvarez,1 Patricio Suárez-Gil,3 Fernando Martínez-Martínez,4 Miguel Ángel Calleja-Hernández51Pharmacy Department, Hospital de Cabueñes, Gijón, Spain; 2Pharmacy Department, Primary Health Care, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Dirección Asistencial Oeste, Madrid, Spain; 3Research Unit Área V, Hospital de Cabueñes, Gijón, Spain; 4Responsable del Grupo de Investigación en Atención Farmacéutica, Universidad de Granada, 5UGC Provincial de Farmacia de Granada Instituto de Biomedicina de Granada, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, SpainBackground: In Spain, hospital medicines are assessed and selected by local Pharmacy and Therapeutics committees (PTCs). Of all the drugs assessed, cancer drugs are particularly important because of their budgetary impact and the sometimes arguable added value with respect to existing alternatives. This study analyzed the PTC drug selection process and the main objective was to evaluate the degree of compliance of prescriptions for oncology drugs with their criteria for use.Methods: This was a retrospective observational study (May 2007 to April 2010) of PTC-assessed drugs. The variables measured to describe the committee's activity were number of drugs assessed per year and number of drugs included in any of these settings: without restrictions, with criteria for use, and not included in formulary. These drugs were also analyzed by therapeutic group. To assess the degree of compliance of prescriptions, a score was calculated to determine whether prescriptions for bevacizumab, cetuximab, trastuzumab, and bortezomib were issued in accordance with PTC drug use criteria.Results: The PTC received requests for inclusion of 40 drugs, of which 32 were included in the hospital formulary (80.0%). Criteria for use were established for 28 (87.5%) of the drugs included. In total, 293 patients were treated with the four cancer drugs in eight different therapeutic indications. The average prescription compliance scores were as follows: bevacizumab, 83% for metastatic colorectal cancer, 100% for metastatic breast cancer, and 82.3% for non-small-cell lung cancer; cetuximab, 62.0% for colorectal cancer and 50% for head and neck cancer; trastuzumab, 95.1% for early breast cancer and 82.4% for metastatic breast cancer; and bortezomib, 63.7% for multiple myeloma.Conclusion: The degree of compliance with criteria for use of cancer drugs was reasonably high. PTC functions need to be changed so that they can carry out more innovative tasks, such as monitoring conditions for drug use.Keywords: decision-making, drug selection, drug utilization, formulary, neoplasm, Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee

In routine clinical settings, identifying the factors that influence the persistence of biologic therapies is crucial for tailoring psoriasis management to individual patient profiles. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world drug survival of tildrakizumab in patients diagnosed with plaque psoriasis at the Dermatology Department of HUCA and to explore the clinical predictors of treatment discontinuation. We conducted a retrospective, hospital-based analysis involving 100 patients treated with tildrakizumab (Ilumetri^®) between 1 January 2021 and 30 April 2024. Kaplan–Meier estimates were used to construct survival curves, and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Both crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated to assess potential differences across patient subgroups. The multivariate analysis identified statistically significant associations between reduced drug survival and the presence of psoriatic arthritis (p = 0.02), previous biologic exposure (p = 0.02), and arterial hypertension (p = 0.012). Other comorbidities did not demonstrate significant effects. The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were primary inefficacy and suboptimal response in patients with arthritis. Overall, tildrakizumab demonstrated robust survival outcomes in this patient population, though diminished persistence was observed in those with prior biologic use, comorbid arthritis, and hypertension.

There is limited evidence about the real-world survival of apremilast in patients with psoriasis, especially over the long term. To evaluate the long-term survival of apremilast and its predictive factors when used to treat psoriasis. A retrospective hospital-based study, including data collected from 104 patients. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Proportional hazard Cox regression models were used for multivariate analysis. The average duration of the treatment before discontinuation was 28.82 months (95% CI, 22.08-35.57 months) and the median was 12 months (95% CI, 2.68-21.31 months). The retention rates were 51% (1 year), and 33% (5 years). The survival study revealed statistically significant differences between patients with PASI= 10 group (log-rank test, p < 0.001). The 5-year prevalences were 64% for patients with a PASI of = 10. In the PASI < 10-patient group, the retention rates were 77% (1 year) and 64% (5 years). Furthermore, 66% of patients who continued apremilast treatment for more than 2 years were receiving off-label doses (30 mg/day). Apremilast may be a suitable and efficient alternative for the treatment of psoriasis patients in the PASI<10 group.

Background and Objectives: Ixekizumab is a human monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-17A, approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Given its demonstrated efficacy and safety in clinical trials, this study aimed to evaluate the real-world drug survival of Ixekizumab and identify clinical predictors of treatment discontinuation. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, observational, hospital-based study was conducted in the Department of Dermatology at the Central University Hospital of Asturias (HUCA). Patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who initiated treatment with Ixekizumab (Taltz^®) between 8 June 2017 and 10 October 2024, were included. Demographic data, comorbidities, age at disease onset, family history, PASI score, and previous treatments were recorded. Drug survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and the log-rank test. Predictors of discontinuation were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Results: A total of 103 patients (55.3% women) were included. Drug survival rates were 85% at one year, 73% at two years, and 61% at four years, with a mean treatment duration of 52.5 months (95% CI: 46.01–58.99). Multivariate analysis showed that patients under the age of 65 had a significantly higher risk of treatment discontinuation (hazard ratio: 1.813; p < 0.05). The most common reason for discontinuation was secondary treatment failure (45.16%). Ixekizumab demonstrated sustained drug survival in a real-world setting, with rates falling within the mid-to-upper range reported in the literature. Older age (>65 years) was associated with greater treatment persistence, highlighting a potential influence of age on long-term therapeutic adherence.