Farhad Bahmanpouri

Dr. Farhad Bahmanpouri

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2022 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FBFarhad Bahmanpouri
Farhad Bahmanpouri
Silvia BarbettaSilvia Barbetta
Silvia Barbetta
Carlo GualtieriCarlo Gualtieri
Carlo Gualtieri
MIMarco Ianniruberto
Marco Ianniruberto
NFNaziano Filizola
Naziano Filizola
TMTommaso Moramarco
Tommaso Moramarco

1 March 2021 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FBFarhad Bahmanpouri
Farhad Bahmanpouri
MDMohammad Daliri
Mohammad Daliri
Alireza KhoshkoneshAlireza Khoshkonesh
Alireza Khoshkonesh
MNMasoud Montazeri Namin
Masoud Montazeri Namin
MBMariano Buccino
Mariano Buccino


28 August 2022 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Alireza KhoshkoneshAlireza Khoshkonesh
Alireza Khoshkonesh
MDMohammad Daliri
Mohammad Daliri
KRKhuram Riaz
Khuram Riaz
FDFariba Ahmadi Dehrashid
Fariba Ahmadi Dehrashid
FBFarhad Bahmanpouri
Farhad Bahmanpouri
Silvia Di FrancescoSilvia Di Francesco
Silvia Di Francesco

28 June 2023 in Ocean Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MFMeisam Qorbani Fouladi
Meisam Qorbani Fouladi
FBFarhad Bahmanpouri
Farhad Bahmanpouri
SRShiva Rezazadeh
Shiva Rezazadeh
FKFatemehsadat Kollolemad
Fatemehsadat Kollolemad
MMMohamadreza Mashayekhi
Mohamadreza Mashayekhi
Giacomo ViccioneGiacomo Viccione
Giacomo Viccione

1 February 2023 in Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FBFarhad Bahmanpouri
Farhad Bahmanpouri
Carlo GualtieriCarlo Gualtieri
Carlo Gualtieri
HCHubert Chanson
Hubert Chanson
Some basic characteristics of a classic hydraulic jump flow over a pebbled rough bed, as well as on a smooth bed as a reference, are presented in this experimental study. For the experiments, an inflow Froude number Fr1from 1.54 to 4.94 and inflow Reynolds number Re1from 42 000 to 230 000 were considered. Visual observations and measurements suggested some differences between the formation of a hydraulic jump on rough and smooth bed configurations, including different air entrainment processes, larger vortical structures in the roller length and stronger backward flow in the upper layer. Furthermore, the jump roller and aerated flow lengths were shorter on a pebbled rough bed than on a smooth bed, while the dimensionless advection velocity of large vortices was the same for both bed types. The instantaneous jump toe perimeter showed the largest variation at the largest Fr1and was generally larger on rough bed than on smooth bed. Larger oscillations of the free-surface profile were observed on smooth bed, highlighting that roughness resulted in smaller free-surface oscillations, suggesting the higher rate of energy dissipation.