Background: Ambulatory and home blood pressure (BP) monitoring parameters are better predictors of cardiovascular events than are office BP monitoring parameters, but there is a lack of robust data and little information on heart failure (HF) risk. The JAMP study (Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective) used the same ambulatory BP monitoring device, measurement schedule, and diary-based approach to data processing across all study centers and determined the association between both nocturnal hypertension and nighttime BP dipping patterns and the occurrence of cardiovascular events, including HF, in patients with hypertension. Methods: This practitioner-based, nationwide, multicenter, prospective, observational study included patients with at least 1 cardiovascular risk factor, mostly hypertension, and free of symptomatic cardiovascular disease at baseline. All patients underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring at baseline. Patients were followed annually to determine the occurrence of primary end point cardiovascular events (atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and HF). Results: A total of 6,359 patients (68.6±11.7 years of age, 48% men) were included in the final analysis. During a mean±SD follow-up of 4.5±2.4 years, there were 306 cardiovascular events (119 stroke, 99 coronary artery disease, 88 HF). Nighttime systolic BP was significantly associated with the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and HF (hazard ratio adjusted for demographic and clinical risk factors per 20-mm Hg increase: 1.21 [95% CI, 1.03–1.41], P =0.017; and 1.36 [95% CI, 1.08–1.71], P =0.009, respectively). Disrupted circadian BP rhythm (riser pattern, nighttime BP higher than daytime BP) was significantly associated with higher overall cardiovascular disease risk (1.48 [95% CI, 1.05–2.08]; P =0.024), and especially HF (2.45 [95% CI, 1.34–4.48]; P =0.004) compared with normal circadian rhythm. Conclusions: Nighttime BP levels and a riser pattern were independently associated with the total cardiovascular event rate, in particular for HF. These findings suggest the importance of antihypertensive strategies targeting nighttime systolic BP. Registration: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ ; Unique identifier: UMIN000020377.

BACKGROUND: Home blood pressure (BP) is an important component of digital strategies for hypertension management. However, no studies have used the same device to investigate 24-hour BP control status in relation to different home BP control thresholds. METHODS: Participants in the general practitioner-based, multicenter HI-JAMP study (Home-Activity Information and Communication Technology-Based Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective) underwent office BP measurement, then 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, then home BP monitoring for 5 days. A validated all-in-one BP monitoring device was used to measure office, home, and ambulatory BP. Baseline data were used to investigate ambulatory BP control status in individuals with well-controlled home BP based on the different guideline thresholds (125/75 mm Hg, 130/80 mm Hg, and 135/85 mm Hg). RESULTS: Data from 2269 patients were analyzed. For individuals with well-controlled home BP <135/85 mm Hg (59.5% of the total population), the prevalence of uncontrolled 24-hour (≥130/80 mm Hg), daytime (≥135/85 mm Hg), and nighttime ambulatory BP (≥120/70 mm Hg) was 19.9%, 18.5%, and 33.6%, respectively. Corresponding prevalence rates in the 42.7% of participants with well-controlled home BP <130/80 mm Hg were 13.4%, 12.9%, and 26.0%, and when well-controlled home BP was strictly defined as <125/75 mm Hg (23.9% of the population), prevalence of rates of uncontrolled 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime ambulatory BP were 7.0%, 9.0%, and 15.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Home BP control status defined using different thresholds could predict 24-hour ambulatory BP control status in treated hypertension. One-third of individuals still had uncontrolled nocturnal hypertension when home BP was controlled to <135/85 mm Hg, but ambulatory BP was quite well controlled when home BP was <125/75 mm Hg.

The relationships between home blood pressure (BP), masked hypertension defined by home BP, and integrated flow‐mediated vasodilation (FMD) response remain unclear. The authors enrolled 257 patients (mean age, 63.5 years; 51% men) who had at least one cardiovascular risk factor. FMD of the brachial artery was measured with a semiautomatic edge‐detection algorithm. The integrated FMD response was calculated as the area under the dilation curve during 120 seconds after deflation (FMD‐AUC₁₂₀) and the FMD magnitude as the percentage change in peak diameter (ΔFMD). Masked hypertension was defined by office BP <140/90 mm Hg and home BP ≥135 mm Hg and/or 85 mm Hg. Home systolic BP was inversely correlated with FMD‐AUC₁₂₀ and ΔFMD (FMD‐AUC₁₂₀: r=−.23, P<.001; ΔFMD: r=−.13, P=.041), and office systolic BP was inversely associated with FMD‐AUC₁₂₀ (r=−.16, P=.011), but not with ΔFMD. After adjusting for covariates, home systolic BP (β=−.27, P=.003), but not office BP, was inversely associated with FMD‐AUC₁₂₀, whereas ΔFMD was not associated with office or home systolic BP. FMD‐AUC₁₂₀ was significantly lower in patients with masked hypertension compared with those with normotension (7.7±6.7 vs 11.5±8.8 mm × s, P=.048). Home systolic BP and masked hypertension defined by home BP were associated with a decrease in FMD‐AUC₁₂₀.

The aim of this study was to compare the differences in the levels of a highly sensitive cardiac troponin T (Hs-cTnT) between Losartan (LOS) plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and amlodipine. Seventy-eight hypertensive patients were randomized to receive LOS/HCTZ or amlodipine for 8 weeks. Both treatments decreased clinic and 24-hour blood pressure to the same extent. The Hs-cTnT level was significantly reduced in the amlodipine group (P < .05), but such a reduction was not found in the LOS/HCTZ group in the upper half group of Hs-cTnT level at baseline. Amlodipine had a more beneficial effect than LOS/HCTZ in patients with high Hs-cTnT levels.

Background: A notched P‐wave is associated with the occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the association between a notched P‐wave and AF recurrence in patients who have undergone a catheter ablation for AF is unclear.Methods: We enrolled 100 subjects who underwent catheter ablation for AF (paroxysmal AF: 60 cases; persistent AF: 40 cases). Twelve‐lead electrocardiography (ECG) was conducted, and the peak‐to‐peak distance in the M shape was calculated automatically using a 12‐lead ECG analysis system. A notched P‐wave was defined as a P‐wave with an M‐shape and a peak‐to‐peak distance of ≥20 ms in lead II. We compared the recurrence of AF in the patients with notched P‐wave and the others.Results: The mean follow‐up period was 12 ± 8 months, and a recurrence of AF was observed in 28 patients. The recurrence of AF in the notched P‐wave group was significantly higher than that in the controls (log rank 5.14, p = .023). A notched P‐wave was a significant predictor of the recurrence of AF after adjustment for age, gender, history of heart failure, history of catheter ablation, persistent AF, use of antiarrhythmic drugs, and the left atrial volume index (hazard ratio 2.470, 95% confidence interval 1.065–5.728, p = .035).Conclusions: Automatically identified notched P‐waves with peak‐to‐peak distance ≥20 ms were associated with AF recurrence in patients who had undergone catheter ablation.