Gabor L Lövei

Prof. Gabor L Lövei

Aarhus University
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

45Years (1982-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 May 2011 in ZooKeys
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJohan Kotze
Johan Kotze
PBPietro Brandmayr
Pietro Brandmayr
ACAchille Casale
Achille Casale
EDEmmanuelle Dauffy-Richard
Emmanuelle Dauffy-Richard
WDWouter Dekoninck
Wouter Dekoninck
TBTullia Zetto Brandmayr
Tullia Zetto Brandmayr
‘Carabidologists do it all’ (Niemelä 1996a) is a phrase with which most European carabidologists are familiar. Indeed, during the last half a c

16 December 2016 in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LHLawrence N. Hudson
Lawrence N. Hudson
TNTim Newbold
Tim Newbold
SCSara Contu
Sara Contu
SHSamantha L. L. Hill
Samantha L. L. Hill
ILIgor Lysenko
Igor Lysenko
APAndy Purvis
Andy Purvis
The PREDICTS project—Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems (https://www.nhm.ac.uk/our-science/our-work/biodiversity/predicts.html)—has collated from published studies a large, reasonably representative database of comparable samples of biodiversity from multiple sites that differ in the nature or intensity of human impacts relating to land use. We have used this evidence base to develop global and regional statistical models of how local biodiversity responds to these measures. We describe and make freely available this 2016 release of the database, containing more than 3.2 million records sampled at over 26,000 locations and representing over 47,000 species. We outline how the database can help in answering a range of questions in ecology and conservation biology. To our knowledge, this is the largest and most geographically and taxonomically representative database of spatial comparisons of biodiversity that has been collated to date; it will be useful to researchers and international efforts wishing to model and understand the global status of biodiversity.

1 July 2017 in Crop Protection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGraham S. Begg
Graham S. Begg
SCSamantha M. Cook
Samantha M. Cook
RDRichard Dye
Richard Dye
Marco FerranteMarco Ferrante
Marco Ferrante
PFPierre Franck
Pierre Franck
ABA.Nicholas E. Birch
A.Nicholas E. Birch

2 December 2014 in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LHLawrence N. Hudson
Lawrence N. Hudson
TNTim Newbold
Tim Newbold
SCSara Contu
Sara Contu
SHSamantha L. L. Hill
Samantha L. L. Hill
ILIgor Lysenko
Igor Lysenko
APAndy Purvis
Andy Purvis
Biodiversity continues to decline in the face of increasing anthropogenic pressures such as habitat destruction, exploitation, pollution and introduction of alien species. Existing global databases of species’ threat status or population time series are dominated by charismatic species. The collation of datasets with broad taxonomic and biogeographic extents, and that support computation of a range of biodiversity indicators, is necessary to enable better understanding of historical declines and to project – and avert – future declines. We describe and assess a new database of more than 1.6 million samples from 78 countries representing over 28,000 species, collated from existing spatial comparisons of local‐scale biodiversity exposed to different intensities and types of anthropogenic pressures, from terrestrial sites around the world. The database contains measurements taken in 208 (of 814) ecoregions, 13 (of 14) biomes, 25 (of 35) biodiversity hotspots and 16 (of 17) megadiverse countries. The database contains more than 1% of the total number of all species described, and more than 1% of the described species within many taxonomic groups – including flowering plants, gymnosperms, birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, beetles, lepidopterans and hymenopterans. The dataset, which is still being added to, is therefore already considerably larger and more representative than those used by previous quantitative models of biodiversity trends and responses. The database is being assembled as part of thePREDICTSproject (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems –https://www.nhm.ac.uk/our-science/our-work/biodiversity/predicts.html). We make site‐level summary data available alongside this article. The full database will be publicly available in 2015.


7 August 2023 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Amy HahsAmy Hahs
Amy Hahs
BFBertrand Fournier
Bertrand Fournier
MAMyla F. J. Aronson
Myla F. J. Aronson
CNCharles H. Nilon
Charles H. Nilon
AHAdriana Herrera-Montes
Adriana Herrera-Montes
MMMarco Moretti
Marco Moretti
Cities can host significant biological diversity. Yet, urbanisation leads to the loss of habitats, species, and functional groups. Understanding how multiple taxa respond to urbanisation globally is essential to promote and conserve biodiversity in cities. Using a dataset encompassing six terrestrial faunal taxa (amphibians, bats, bees, birds, carabid beetles and reptiles) across 379 cities on 6 continents, we show that urbanisation produces taxon-specific changes in trait composition, with traits related to reproductive strategy showing the strongest response. Our findings suggest that urbanisation results in four trait syndromes (mobile generalists, site specialists, central place foragers, and mobile specialists), with resources associated with reproduction and diet likely driving patterns in traits associated with mobility and body size. Functional diversity measures showed varied responses, leading to shifts in trait space likely driven by critical resource distribution and abundance, and taxon-specific trait syndromes. Maximising opportunities to support taxa with different urban trait syndromes should be pivotal in conservation and management programmes within and among cities. This will reduce the likelihood of biotic homogenisation and helps ensure that urban environments have the capacity to respond to future challenges. These actions are critical to reframe the role of cities in global biodiversity loss.