Background: The aim of this phase II study was to determine toxicity, response rate, time to progression, and overall survival of cisplatin, etoposide and gemcitabine in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary tumour site. Patients and methods: Thirty patients with no previous chemotherapy and not belonging to a treatable group were treated with cisplatin 70 mg/m² on day 1, etoposide 70 mg/m² on days 1 and 2, and gemcitabine 700 mg m² on days 1 and 8, administered every 3 weeks. Stable or responding patients received a maximum of eight cycles. Twenty patients (67%) had more than three affected sites, and 25 patients (84%) had adenocarcinomas. Results: Overall response rate was 36.6% (11 patients), including four complete responses (13.3%) and seven partial responses (23.3%), with a 95% confidence interval of 19.9–56. Median survival was 7.21 months and eight patients remained alive for >1 year. Myelosuppression was the most important toxicity, with grade 3–4 neutropenia in 18 patients (60%) in 32% of the cycles: eight patients had neutropenic fever and 10 patients had thrombopenia in 11% of cycles. No non-haematological grade 4 toxicity occurred. Conclusions: Cisplatin, etoposide and gemcitabine is an active combination, inducing objective responses in a subset of heavily advanced disease patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site. The role of adding gemcitabine to cisplatin and etoposide remains to be resolved as to the best schedule to diminish toxicity for the three-drug combination.

Germline mutations in TP53, a tumor suppressor gene, are involved in the development of Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a rare disorder that predisposes carriers to multiple tumors. TP53 mutations have been associated with resistance to treatment and poor prognosis. A young female with the pathogenic germline TP53 mutation c.844C > T (p.R282W) was diagnosed with two metachronous breast tumors, one HER2-negative and the other HER2-positive. She was later diagnosed with synchronous glioblastoma, epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, and HER2-negative breast cancer metastases. The patient was treated with local therapies, including brain surgery and radiotherapy, lung surgery, and a bilateral mastectomy, as well as with targeted systemic treatment. She proved to be highly sensitive to systemic therapy, and 13 years after the initial diagnosis of breast cancer and 6 years after the diagnosis of the two new primary tumors and recurrence of a prior cancer, she is alive with an excellent performance status. This surprising positive evolution may well be partly due to the pronged multidisciplinary approach to managing her disease and her extraordinary response to treatment: the lung adenocarcinoma showed excellent response to erlotinib; the breast cancer responded extremely well to eribulin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; and the glioblastoma has remained in response to surgery and radiotherapy. Despite harboring a TP53 mutation and having multiple tumors, this patient has shown an unexpectedly favorable evolution. The coordinated participation of a multidisciplinary team and the patient’s own extraordinarily high sensitivity to systemic treatment played a major role in this evolution.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive subtype with limited therapeutic options, leading to higher relapse rates and mortality. Identifying prognostic biomarkers like caveolin-1 (CAV1) is crucial for personalized treatment. CAV1 influences tumor progression and chemotherapy response, particularly through its interaction with the tumor microenvironment (TME) and cancer metabolism. Understanding the prognostic value of CAV1 in different cellular compartments is essential for its clinical application in TNBC. In the methods section CAV1 gene expression in TNBC was evaluated using in silico analysis, followed by the immunohistochemical staining of tumor cytoplasm (cCAV1) and stromal cells (sCAV1) in 58 early-stage TNBC patients. Statistical analyses were performed to correlate CAV1 expression with clinicopathological features and survival. In the results section, in silico analysis revealed higher CAV1 expression in TNBC, correlating with shorter overall survival. In the patient samples, cCAV1 was observed in 10.3% of cases, and was associated with larger tumors, higher grades, and poorer prognoses. sCAV1 was detected in 42% of cases, associated with less proliferative and less aggressive tumors, but did not significantly impact prognoses. In conclusion, cCAV1 expression is a significant prognostic marker in early-stage TNBC, highlighting the importance of assessing CAV1 in different cellular compartments. Further research is needed to explore the mechanisms and clinical implications of cCAV1.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is distinct from other cancers of the head and neck in biology, epidemiology, histology, natural history, and response to treatment. Radiotherapy is the cornerstone of locoregional treatment of non-disseminated disease and, in combination with chemotherapy, improves survival rates. In the case of metastatic disease stages, treatment requires platinum/gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, and patients may achieve a long survival time. In these guidelines (updated in 2025), we summarize current evidence and available therapies for the medical management of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.