Novel inhibitors of KRAS with G12C mutation (sotorasib) have demonstrated short-lasting responses due to resistance mediated by the AKT-mTOR-P70S6K pathway. In this context, metformin is a promising candidate to break this resistance by inhibiting mTOR and P70S6K. Therefore, this project aimed to explore the effects of the combination of sotorasib and metformin on cytotoxicity, apoptosis, and the activity of the MAPK and mTOR pathways. We created dose–effect curves to determine the IC50 concentration of sotorasib, and IC10 of metformin in three lung cancer cell lines; A549 (KRAS G12S), H522 (wild-type KRAS), and H23 (KRAS G12C). Cellular cytotoxicity was evaluated by an MTT assay, apoptosis induction through flow cytometry, and MAPK and mTOR pathways were assessed by Western blot. Our results showed a sensitizing effect of metformin on sotorasib effect in cells with KRAS mutations and a slight sensitizing effect in cells without K-RAS mutations. Furthermore, we observed a synergic effect on cytotoxicity and apoptosis induction, as well as a notable inhibition of the MAPK and AKT-mTOR pathways after treatment with the combination, predominantly in KRAS-mutated cells (H23 and A549). The combination of metformin with sotorasib synergistically enhanced cytotoxicity and apoptosis induction in lung cancer cells, regardless of KRAS mutational status.

Purpose: Mutations in the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral (KRAS) oncogene constitute a significant driver of lung adenocarcinoma, present in 10–40% of patients, which exhibit heterogeneous clinical outcomes, mainly driven by concurrent genetic alterations. However, characterization of KRAS mutational subtypes and their impact on clinical outcomes in Latin America is limited. Methods: A cohort study was conducted at the National Cancer Institute (INCan) of Mexico. Individuals with advance-staged of adenocarcinoma and KRAS mutations, detected by next-generation sequencing, having undergone at least one line of therapy were included for analysis. Clinical and pathological characteristics were retrieved from institutional database from June 2014 to March 2023. Results: KRAS was identified in fifty-four (15.6%) of 346 patients, among which 50 cases were included for analysis. KRAS^G12D (n = 16, 32%) and KRAS^G12C (n = 16, 32%) represented the most prevalent subtypes. KRAS^G12D mutations were associated with female (p = 0.018), never smokers (p = 0.108), and concurrences with EGFR (25.0% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.124) and CDKN2A (18.8% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.157). KRAS^G12D patients showed a better ORR (66.6% vs. 30.0%; OR 4.66, 95% CI 1.23–17.60, p = 0.023) and on multivariate analysis was significantly associated with better PFS (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16–0.80; p = 0.012) and OS (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08–0.70; p = 0.009). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study represents the first effort to comprehensively characterize the molecular heterogeneity of KRAS-mutant NSCLC in Latin American patients. Our data reinforce the current view that KRAS-mutated NSCLC is not a single oncogene-driven disease and emphasizes the prognostic impact of diverse molecular profiles in this genomically defined subset of NSCLC. Further validation is warranted in larger multicenter Latin American cohorts to confirm our findings.

Immune dysregulation and cancer treatment may affect SARS-CoV-2 vaccination protection. Antibody production by B-cells play a vital role in the control and clearance of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This study prospectively explores B-cell seroconversion following SARS-CoV-2 immunization in healthy individuals and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing oncological treatment. 92 NSCLC patients and 27 healthy individuals’ blood samples were collected after receiving any COVID-19 vaccine. Serum and mononuclear cells were isolated, and a serum surrogate virus neutralization test kit evaluated SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. B-cell subpopulations on mononuclear cells were characterized by flow cytometry. Patients were compared based on vaccination specifications and target mutation oncological treatment. A higher percentage of healthy individuals developed more SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies than NSCLC patients (63% vs. 54.3%; p = 0.03). NSCLC patients receiving chemotherapy (CTX) or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) developed antibodies in 45.2% and 53.7%, of cases, respectively, showing an impaired antibody generation. CTX patients exhibited trends towards lower median antibody production than TKIs (1.0, IQR 83 vs. 38.23, IQR 89.22; p = 0.069). Patients receiving immunotherapy did not generate antibodies. A sub-analysis revealed that those with ALK mutations exhibited non-significant trends towards higher antibody titers (63.02, IQR 76.58 vs. 21.78, IQR 93.5; p = 0.1742) and B-cells quantification (10.80, IQR 7.52 vs. 7.22, IQR 3.32; p = 0.1382) against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein than EGFR patients; nonetheless, these differences were not statistically significant. This study shows that antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 may be impaired in patients with NSCLC secondary to EGFR-targeted TKIs compared to ALK-directed treatment.

The authors would like to make the following corrections to this published paper