Alice Richman

Dr. Alice Richman


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 January 2016 in Journal of American College Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAlice Richman
Alice Richman
LMLaDonna Maddy
LaDonna Maddy
ETEssie Torres
Essie Torres
EGEllen J. Goldberg
Ellen J. Goldberg
Objective: To evaluate an intervention aimed at increasing human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine completion of the 3-dose series and knowledge. Participants: Two hundred sixty-four male and female US college students 18–26 years old who were receiving HPV vaccine dose 1. Methods: Students were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Intervention participants received the electronic intervention (text/e-mail appointment reminders and education messages) and controls received standard-of-care. Baseline/follow-up survey data were collected. Main outcome measures included vaccine completion and knowledge. Results: HPV vaccine completion across groups were not significantly different for HPV dose 2 (53% vs 52%) and dose 3 (34% vs 32%). Mean knowledge score at follow-up for intervention group was significantly higher (p = .01) than at baseline. No significant differences in knowledge were found for the control group. The biggest predictor of HPV vaccine completion was female gender. Conclusions: The intervention increased knowledge but not vaccine completion. More research with catch-up age populations is needed.

30 January 2014 in Sex Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAlice Richman
Alice Richman
MWMonica C. Webb
Monica C. Webb
JBJason Brinkley
Jason Brinkley
RMRyan J. Martin
Ryan J. Martin
Many US college students are reported to engage in risky sexual behaviour. Smartphone applications are a popular way to provide users with information in real time. We explored the potential for mobile technology to be used in promoting the sexual health of college students. Using findings from an online survey among a random sample of 5000 college students (15% response), we examined sexual behaviours and interest in a sexual health application in January 2012. The majority of students were female (73%) and owned a smartphone (74%). Twenty-nine per cent currently used health-related applications on their phone and 67% reported interest in using a free application that could improve/manage their sexual health. Interest in use varied based on gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, having an unintended pregnancy, sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing, smartphone ownership and past application use. The top most useful features for women included a period tracker (46%), birth control reminder (43%) and STI and pregnancy symptom checker (30%). Women were more likely to be interested in using the application compared with men and those engaging in more sexual activity were more likely to be interested as compared with those engaging in less sexual activity. The evaluation of mobile technology to promote healthy sexuality among college students is warranted.

1 October 2012 in Contraception
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAlice Richman
Alice Richman
EDEllen M. Daley
Ellen M. Daley
JBJulie Baldwin
Julie Baldwin
JKJeff Kromrey
Jeff Kromrey
KOKathleen O'ROurke
Kathleen O'ROurke
KPKay Perrin
Kay Perrin

28 November 2010 in Sexually Transmitted Infections
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAlice Richman
Alice Richman
NBNoel T Brewer
Noel T Brewer
ALAliza K Liebman
Aliza K Liebman
ARAllen C Rinas
Allen C Rinas
JSJennifer S Smith
Jennifer S Smith
Objectives Human papillomavirus self-tests that can be used at home and returned by mail may increase cervical cancer screening rates. Growing evidence suggests that self-test methods could increase screening for high-risk and hard-to-reach populations. The purpose of this study was to identify which self-test device women prefer and why. Methods Four focus groups were conducted with 30 high-risk women in two rural and two urban counties in North Carolina. Women evaluated three self-test devices: the Pantarhei screener (a lavage that releases liquid into the vagina and re-collects fluid), the Qiagen cervical brush (a brush that women insert into the vagina and is turned around to collect cells) and the Fournier cervical self-sampling device (a tampon-like plastic wand). Results The majority of women reported that they would use the brush (70%), followed by the wand (67%) and the lavage (43%). Women from urban areas appeared to prefer the brush, whereas women from rural areas endorsed the wand. Women reported liking the lavage because it seemed easy to use; they liked the wand because of its inviting colour (green), and liked the brush because of its small size and familiarity. Women reported disliking the lavage because the liquid seemed messy and unsanitary, disliked the wand due to the 15–20 recommended turns, and disliked the brush because it was short and the tip seemed abrasive. Conclusions No one device was perfect, although suggestions for an optimal self-test most resembled the brush. These findings can be used to develop an optimal self-test collector for women.

11 June 2020 in Journal of Community Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAlice Richman
Alice Richman
ETEssie Torres
Essie Torres
QWQiang Wu
Qiang Wu
AKAmy P. Kampschroeder
Amy P. Kampschroeder

18 March 2015 in Journal of Cancer Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAlice Richman
Alice Richman
JTJamie L. Troutman
Jamie L. Troutman
ETEssie Torres
Essie Torres