The changing demands on healthcare require continuous development and education in the nursing profession. Homogeneity in nursing qualifications reduces educational inconsistencies between and within countries. However, despite various initiatives, modifying nurse education remains challenging because different countries have their own legislations, structures, motivations, and policies. To summarize the characteristics of nurse education programs around the globe and analyze the similarities and differences between them. A scoping review was performed to identify different characteristics of nurse education programs in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. Records published between January 2016 and July 2021 were searched in the PubMed, Cinahl, and ERIC databases. The reference lists of all included articles were also searched manually for relevant studies. Articles were eligible if they described nurse education in one or more of the selected countries with a focus on nursing degrees (both undergraduate and postgraduate programs), nursing titles, program duration, study load hours, or practice hours. Data were independently extracted using a predefined extraction sheet. We asked the respective nursing associations for confirmation and to provide any additional information. After searching 9769 records, 117 were included in the synthesis. The included records described characteristics of undergraduate nursing educational programs (n = 50), postgraduate programs (n = 30), or both (n = 37). In total, 86 undergraduate and 82 postgraduate programs were described, with a great variety in degrees, nursing titles, study load hours, and practice hours. This study demonstrates that there is still considerable variation in nurse education programs between countries. These diverse educational pathways lead to different nursing titles and internationally standardized definitions of nursing roles have not been established. This makes it difficult to understand the healthcare role of nurses. Hence, efforts are needed to increase the quality and uniformity of nurse education around the world.

Aim: To identify and follow‐up on the transition towards differentiated nursing practice among bachelor trained and vocationally trained nurses in Dutch hospitals.Design: A multiphase general qualitative interview study.Methods: Fifty semi‐structured interviews with project managers in charge of introducing differentiated nursing practice to their hospital were conducted. Purposive sampling was used, and data were collected in 2017, 2019 and 2020. A meta‐analysis was conducted after independent primary thematic analysis of each data collection.Results: The introduction of differentiated nursing practice to Dutch hospitals was perceived as uncertain and ambiguous. Three themes were identified during the transition towards differentiated nursing practice: (1) call to action; (2) sitting and waiting; and (3) new beginnings and open ends. The change to differentiated nursing practice is not straightforward and these findings highlight the emerging awareness among project managers of the nature and complexity of the transition. During the study period, professionalization of the nursing profession was recognized as fundamental in hospital organizations.Conclusion: Nursing cannot be separated from differentiated nursing practice. Visible leadership is important at all organizational levels and nurses’ opinions must be considered as nurses are essential to such changes in healthcare.Impact: Differentiated nursing practice based on nursing education allows nurses to make the best use of their experience, skills and competencies, and could promote the provision of effective and high‐quality patient care. However, in many cases, a nurse's practice role is based on their nursing licensure instead of their educational background. The change to differentiated nursing practice in hospitals is not straightforward and the nature and complexity of the transition needs to be acknowledged. Nurses have an important role in healthcare transformation and need to be active in developing and formulating rather than just implementing the changes.

Background/Objectives: The nursing work environment is a critical element in healthcare delivery and a strong predictor of both patient and nurse outcomes. Understanding the complexity and multifaceted nature of this environment is essential for improving nursing practices and optimizing healthcare systems. This study aimed to gain insights into the perceived characteristics of the nursing work environment, considering it as a complex and multifaceted system. Methods: A qualitative research approach was employed, involving 42 semi-structured interviews with 43 nurses and managers from academic, teaching, and general hospitals in The Netherlands. Data were collected between July 2020 and August 2021 through convenience sampling. Thematic coding was conducted to identify key patterns and themes. Results: The findings revealed that nurses demonstrated flexibility and a strong commitment to high-quality care, despite grappling with rigorous organizational tasks and processes. Four key themes emerged: (1) direct patient care as a standard feature of nursing work; (2) nurses’ flexibility for hospital productivity; (3) interdependencies, which decrease autonomous nursing practices; and (4) organizational structures that determine how nurses can shape their work. Nurses found it difficult to balance direct care with broader tasks due to organizational rigidity, revealing a gap between ideal nursing practices and daily reality. Conclusions: This study highlighted the challenges within the nursing work environment, particularly in balancing direct care with organizational demands. Addressing this gap between ideal nursing practice and reality requires a systems approach. This includes autonomous practices, supportive management, and flexible structures, allowing nurses to shape their work and enhance job satisfaction and care quality.

Background: Addressing the growing challenge of nurse retention requires coordinated actions at national and global levels to improve recruitment, retention policies, and investments in the nursing work environment. The nursing work environment, defined as the "organizational characteristics of a work setting that facilitate or constrain professional nursing practice", is critical in influencing whether nurses decide to leave their jobs. This study investigates the impact of differentiated nursing practices – which involved tailoring roles and responsibilities based on nurses’ training, skills, and experience in Dutch hospitals – and investigated their impact on the nursing work environment and turnover intention (i.e., nurses’ intentions to leave their organization). We also explored whether the work environment mediates this relationship. Methods: A multicenter longitudinal cohort study was conducted across 19 Dutch hospitals between 2019 and 2023. Nursing professionals participated via digital surveys administered before (T0) and after (T1) differentiated nursing practices were introduced. The nursing work environment was assessed using the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index. A multilevel analysis with a random intercept and fixed slope was used to evaluate the impact of differentiated nursing practices on the work environment and on nurses' turnover intentions. Results: We received 5411 responses to our questionnaire – 4259 at T0 and 1152 at T1. Results showed that, while the overall work environment improved, particularly in the dimensions of staffing and resource adequacy, collegial nurse–physician relationships, and participation in hospital affairs, there were no significant improvements in nursing foundation for quality of care or nurse managers' ability, leadership, and support of nurses. Additionally, differentiated nursing practices did not significantly impact turnover intention, nor did the work environment mediate this relationship. Conclusions: This study is the first to explore the unique effects of practice differentiation on turnover intention mediated by the work environment. The findings suggest that, while differentiated practices can enhance certain aspects of the work environment, a more systemic and integrated approach is required for sustained improvements. Future research should include longer term studies to fully understand the complex relationship and accompanying mechanisms between differentiated nursing practices, the nursing work environment, and turnover intention. Trial registration: Clinical trial number not applicable.

The nursing work environment is crucial for nurses' well-being and patients’ quality of care. Despite effective interventions to improve the nursing work environment, understanding the most effective types and integration mechanisms for nurses remain challenging. As nursing practices evolve amid complex care demands and staff shortages, understanding nurses’ challenges, support systems, and adoption mechanisms is vital to optimize the work environment and to enhance quality of care, job satisfaction, and staff retention. To explore strategies for promoting and supporting nurse-led changes to improving their work environment. The study employed a participatory action research design on three nursing wards in a Dutch academic hospital. Action research teams with diverse ward nurses were established on each ward. The research took place between September 2022 and October 2023. Data were collected during observations, PhotoVoice workshops, and individual interviews. Data were analyzed using the rigorous and accelerated data reduction technique. Nurses and managers showed patterns of behavior that either hindered or facilitated changes, leading to the emergence of three themes: strengthening relationships, taking the lead, and being up to the task. These themes highlight the importance of fostering collaboration, encouraging proactive attitudes, and building capabilities to address challenges and drive positive changes in their work environment. Feelings of uncertainty emerged in all themes, and this uncertainty hindered nurses from taking responsibility for facilitating change. This study demonstrated different mechanisms that either facilitate or hinder nurse-led changes and how feelings of uncertainty play a role. Nurses emphasized the importance of collaboration and proactive attitudes but faced challenges in recognizing responsibility and their perceived competencies. Strengthening nurses' resilience to and management of uncertainty is essential. Healthcare organizations should help nurses navigate uncertainty to foster positive changes. Collaboration, proactivity, and competency are key in nurse-led changes. Strengthening nurses' resilience and uncertainty management is crucial.