Mary-Louise McLaws

Prof. Mary-Louise McLaws


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

39Years (1988-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2011 in Journal of Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJan Gralton
Jan Gralton
ETEuan Tovey
Euan Tovey
MMMary-Louise McLaws
Mary-Louise McLaws
WRWiliam Rawlinson
Wiliam Rawlinson

1 October 2013 in The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BABenedetta Allegranzi
Benedetta Allegranzi
AGAngèle Gayet-Ageron
Angèle Gayet-Ageron
NDNizam Damani
Nizam Damani
LBLoséni Bengaly
Loséni Bengaly
MMMary-Louise McLaws
Mary-Louise McLaws
DPDidier Pittet
Didier Pittet
Health-care-associated infections are a major threat to patient safety worldwide. Transmission is mainly via the hands of health-care workers, but compliance with recommendations is usually low and effective improvement strategies are needed. We assessed the effect of WHO's strategy for improvement of hand hygiene in five countries. We did a quasi-experimental study between December, 2006, and December, 2008, at six pilot sites (55 departments in 43 hospitals) in Costa Rica, Italy, Mali, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. A step-wise approach in four 3-6 month phases was used to implement WHO's strategy and we assessed the hand-hygiene compliance of health-care workers and their knowledge, by questionnaire, of microbial transmission and hand-hygiene principles. We expressed compliance as the proportion of predefined opportunities met by hand-hygiene actions (ie, handwashing or hand rubbing). We assessed long-term sustainability of core strategy activities in April, 2010. We noted 21,884 hand-hygiene opportunities during 1423 sessions before the intervention and 23,746 opportunities during 1784 sessions after. Overall compliance increased from 51.0% before the intervention (95% CI 45.1-56.9) to 67.2% after (61.8-72.2). Compliance was independently associated with gross national income per head, with a greater effect of the intervention in low-income and middle-income countries (odds ratio [OR] 4.67, 95% CI 3.16-6.89; p<0.0001) than in high-income countries (2.19, 2.03-2.37; p<0.0001). Implementation had a major effect on compliance of health-care workers across all sites after adjustment for main confounders (OR 2.15, 1.99-2.32). Health-care-workers' knowledge improved at all sites with an increase in the average score from 18.7 (95% CI 17.8-19.7) to 24.7 (23.7-25.6) after educational sessions. 2 years after the intervention, all sites reported ongoing hand-hygiene activities with sustained or further improvement, including national scale-up. Implementation of WHO's hand-hygiene strategy is feasible and sustainable across a range of settings in different countries and leads to significant compliance and knowledge improvement in health-care workers, supporting recommendation for use worldwide. WHO, University of Geneva Hospitals, the Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss Society of Public Health Administration and Hospital Pharmacists.

1 February 2015 in American Journal of Infection Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YKYen Lee Angela Kwok
Yen Lee Angela Kwok
JGJan Gralton
Jan Gralton
MMMary-Louise McLaws
Mary-Louise McLaws

1 May 2006 in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMichael Whitby
Michael Whitby
MMMary-Louise McLaws
Mary-Louise McLaws
Michael W RossMichael W Ross
Michael W Ross
Objective.: To elucidate behavioral determinants of handwashing among nurses.Design.: Statistical modeling using the Theory of Planned Behavior and relevant components to handwashing behavior by nurses that were derived from focus-group discussions and literature review.Setting.: The community and 3 tertiary care hospitals.Participants.: Children aged 9-10 years, mothers, and nurses.Results.: Responses from 754 nurses were analyzed using backward linear regression for handwashing intention. We reasoned that handwashing results in 2 distinct behavioral practices—inherent handwashing and elective handwashing—with our model explaining 64% and 76%, respectively, of the variance in behavioral intention. Translation of community handwashing behavior to healthcare settings is the predominant driver of all handwashing, both inherent (weightedβ= 2.92) and elective (weightedβ= 4.1). Intended elective in-hospital handwashing behavior is further significantly predicted by nurses' beliefs in the benefits of the activity (weightedβ= 3.12), peer pressure of senior physicians (weightedβ= 3.0) and administrators (weightedβ= 2.2), and role modeling (weightedβ= 3.0) but only to a minimal extent by reduction in effort (weightedβ= 1.13). Inherent community behavior (weightedβ= 2.92), attitudes (weightedβ= 0.84), and peer behavior (weightedβ= 1.08) were strongly predictive of inherent handwashing intent.Conclusions.: A small increase in handwashing adherence may be seen after implementing the use of alcoholic hand rubs, to decrease the effort required to wash hands. However, the facilitation of compliance is not simply related to effort but is highly dependent on altering behavioral perceptions. Thus, introduction of hand rub alone without an associated behavioral modification program is unlikely to induce a sustained increase in hand hygiene compliance.

1 January 2007 in Journal of Hospital Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MWM. Whitby
M. Whitby
CPC.L. Pessoa-Silva
C.L. Pessoa-Silva
MMMary-Louise McLaws
Mary-Louise McLaws
BAB. Allegranzi
B. Allegranzi
HSH. Sax
H. Sax
DPD. Pittet
D. Pittet

19 April 2010 in BMC Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HSHolly Seale
Holly Seale
AHAnita E Heywood
Anita E Heywood
MMMary-Louise McLaws
Mary-Louise McLaws
KWKirsten F Ward
Kirsten F Ward
CLChris Lowbridge
Chris Lowbridge
RMRaina MacIntyre
Raina MacIntyre
On the 30th September 2009, the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccine was made available to adults and children aged 10 years and over, in Australia. Acceptance of a novel vaccine is influenced by perceptions of risk including risk of infection, risk of death or severe illness and risk of serious vaccine side-effects. We surveyed a sample of residents from Sydney, Australia to ascertain their risk perception, attitudes towards the pandemic and willingness to accept the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccine.