Purpose: CIC-rearranged sarcomas represent a type of undifferentiated small round cell sarcoma (USRCS) characterized by poor survival, rapid development of chemotherapy resistance, and high rates of metastasis. We aim to contribute to the growing body of knowledge regarding diagnosis, treatment, clinical course, and outcomes for these patients. Methods: This case series investigates the clinical courses of ten patients with CIC-rearranged sarcoma treated at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from July 2014 through January 2024. Clinical data were retrospectively extracted from electronic medical records. Results: Patients ranged from 10 to 67 years of age at diagnosis, with seven patients presenting with localized disease and three with metastatic disease. Tumors originated from soft tissues of various anatomic locations. Mean overall survival (OS) was 22.1 months (10.6–52.2), and mean progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.7 months (5.3–52.2). Seven patients received intensive systemic therapy with an Ewing sarcoma-directed regimen or a soft tissue sarcoma-directed regimen. Three patients experienced prolonged disease-free survival without systemic treatment. Conclusion: Most patients in this case series demonstrated aggressive clinical courses consistent with those previously described in the literature, although we note a spectrum of clinical outcomes not previously reported. The diversity of clinical courses underscores the need for an improved understanding of individual tumor biology to enhance clinical decision-making and patient prognosis. Despite its limitations, this article broadens the spectrum of reported clinical outcomes, providing a valuable addition to the published literature on this rare cancer.

Background: Brain metastases in pediatric osteosarcoma are infrequent but associated with a dire prognosis. Methods: This retrospective study examined six pediatric patients at Johns Hopkins Hospital who developed brain metastases from osteosarcoma between April 2015 and November 2023. Results: Median survival post-brain metastasis was 2.5 months. The patients underwent various treatments, including chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation. Despite these interventions, outcomes were uniformly fatal. Notably, one patient survived over 13 months post-brain metastasis with a treatment regimen of cabozantinib and nivolumab along with surgical resection and radiation, highlighting the potential efficacy of multimodal treatment regimens. This case demonstrated changes in the immune microenvironment, hinting at an anti-tumoral response, although no histologic response was observed. Conclusions: These findings emphasize the critical need for vigilant clinical monitoring, especially in patients with new neurological symptoms. The study highlights the diagnostic challenges and the rapid progression of brain metastases, underscoring the necessity for further research. Prospective studies and clinical trials focusing on novel therapeutic strategies are essential to improve outcomes. Disease biology studies examining tumor features across primary, pulmonary, and brain metastatic sites may offer insights into the mechanisms of metastasis and potential therapeutic targets, providing a foundation for better management of this devastating complication.

Background: In September of 2024, the 2nd annual meeting of the Strategic Advances in Sarcoma Science (SASS) convened at the National Institutes of Health. This gathering of national sarcoma experts focused on preclinical studies, clinical trials, opportunities, challenges, and future directions in sarcoma biology and clinical care with a focus on immunotherapy. The Immunology in Sarcoma breakout group conducted a dedicated discussion focused on the current and future implementation of adoptive cellular therapies (ACTs) in sarcomas. The current manuscript summarizes these discussions and provides a comprehensive resource for researchers and clinicians. Results: Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) has shown encouraging results in sarcomas with afami-cel achieving durable responses in synovial sarcoma and early TCR-T trials against NY-ESO-1 and MAGE-A4 demonstrating meaningful response rates. Building on these outcomes will require discovering new targets, selecting optimal cell types, refining conditioning regimens, combining with alternative treatment strategies such as TKIs, and leveraging predictive biomarkers informed by a deeper understanding of the tumor microenvironment. Conclusions: Sarcomas are promising targets for adoptive cell therapy (ACT), as shown by afami-cel’s success in synovial sarcoma, but broader impact requires new target discovery, optimal cell selection, improved conditioning, combination treatments, deeper tumor microenvironment understanding, and predictive biomarkers to achieve more durable responses for more patients.