Background: Advancing the retrograde microcatheter (MC) into the antegrade guide catheter during retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be challenging or impossible, preventing guidewire externalization. Objectives: To detail and evaluate all the techniques focused on wiring to achieve intubation of the distal tip of a microcatheter, balloon, or stent with an antegrade or retrograde guidewire, aiming to reduce complications by minimizing tension on fragile collaterals during externalization and enabling rapid antegrade conversion in various clinical scenarios. Methods: We describe the two main techniques, tip‐in and rendezvous, and their derivatives such a facilitated tip‐in, manual MC‐tip modification, tip‐in the balloon, tip‐in the stent, deep dive rendezvous, catch‐it and antegrade microcatheter probing. We provide case studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of these techniques in complex scenarios involving extreme vessel angulation, severe calcification, fragile collaterals, and challenging retrograde MC crossing without externalization. Conclusion: The development of advanced variants along with traditional techniques to establish retrograde guidewire connection and antegrade conversion has led to the establishment of a cohesive group of methods known as portal techniques. These approaches serve as strategic advantages in retrograde CTO‐PCI, providing a valuable and feasible alternative to conventional retrograde connection techniques, particularly when those techniques fail. Their ability to avoid the externalization process reduces potential damage to collateral channels and the ostium of the donor artery, potentially leading to a reduction in complication rates.

Coronary atherosclerotic lesions at the ostium and proximal coronary arteries pose significant challenges in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), especially in the left main coronary artery (LMCA). Guide catheter‐induced damage can lead to severe complications such as vessel dissection or myocardial infarction. Ostial stent placement with drug‐eluting stents offers mechanical support and reduces restenosis but is technically challenging due to the anatomical complexity of the ostium. Complications like longitudinal stent deformation and hydraulic dissection from contrast media are specific concerns. The aortic free‐floating wire technique, expanded in this article to Wire in Aorta for Localization and Protection of the Ostium (WALPO), provides a method for safely locating and protecting the ostium during PCI, aiming to improve the safety and efficacy of PCI at this location.

Background: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) revascularization is a major source of radiation for both patients and physicians. Therefore, efforts to minimize radiation during CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are highly encouraged.Aims: To evaluate the impact of an Ultra Low fluoroscopic Dose Protocol (ULDP), based on 3.75 frames per second for the fluoroscopy and 7.5 frames per second for the cine acquisition, during CTO PCI.Methods: One hundred fifty consecutive patients who underwent CTO PCI were retrospectively enrolled. Eighty‐five underwent standard dose protocol (SDP) and 65 ULDP. Radiation exposure and acute clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Results were stratified according to lesion complexity.Results: Patients undergoing ULDP, as compared to those undergoing SDP, showed a significant reduction of kerma area product, both for simple lesions (6861.0 vs. 13236.0 mGy × cm²; p = 0.014) and complex lesions (CL) (8865.0 vs. 16618.0 mGy × cm²; p < 0.001). Similarly, Air Kerma (AK) was lower when ULDP was used (1222.5 vs. 2015.0 cGy in SL, p = 0.134; 1499.0 vs. 2794.0 cGy in CL, p < 0.001). No significant differences were reported regarding procedural success and in‐hospital major adverse cardiovascular events between groups. Notably, there was not any crossover from ULDO to SDP due to poor quality images. Interestingly, fluoroscopy time, procedural time and contrast volume was significantly lower in patients undergoing ULDP only for CLs.Conclusions: ULDP significantly reduces radiation exposure in the setting of high complexity procedures such as CTO PCI. This reduction seemed to be greater with increased procedural complexity and did not impact acute success or adverse clinical events.

Background and aim: Patients with non-infarct-related artery chronic total occlusion (non-IRA CTO) found during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) are not rare and have worse clinical outcomes. We aimed to analyze their long-term clinical outcomes in regard to clinical characteristics, revascularization strategies, and adherence to medical therapy. Patients and methods: The dual-center ACS registry of patients treated from Jan 2017 to May 2023 was used to identify 1950 patients with timely PCI in ACS who survived to discharge with documented adequate demographic, clinical, and angiographic characteristics, treatment strategies, and medical therapy adherence during a median follow-up time of 49 months. Results: There were 171 (9%) patients with non-IRA CTO. In comparison to patients without non-IRA CTO, they were older, with more diabetes mellitus (DM), higher Syntax scores (median 27.5 vs. 11.5), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at discharge (median LVEF 50% vs. 55%). There was also a lower proportion of patients with high adherence to medical therapy (32% vs. 46%). Patients with non-IRA CTO had significantly higher cardiovascular mortality during follow-up (18% vs. 8%, RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.27–2.75). After adjusting for relevant clinical and treatment characteristics in a multivariate Cox regression analysis, only lower LVEF, worse renal function, the presence of DM, and lower adherence to medical therapy were independently associated with higher cardiovascular mortality during follow-up, with low adherence to medical therapy as the strongest predictor (RR 3.18, 95% CI 1.76–5.75). Time to cardiovascular death was significantly lower in patients who did not receive non-IRA CTO revascularization, although CTO revascularization did not show independent association with survival in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Patients with non-IRA CTO found during ACS treatment have more unfavorable clinical characteristics, worse adherence to medical therapy, and higher cardiovascular mortality. They need a more scrutinized approach during follow-up to increase adherence to optimal medical therapy and to receive revascularization of the non-IRA CTO whenever it is clinically indicated and reasonably achievable without excess risks.

Large intracoronary thrombus burden during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains technically challenging when conventional manual aspiration is ineffective or dedicated thrombectomy systems are unavailable, unsuitable, or undeliverable. Routine aspiration thrombectomy is not guideline-supported, but selective bail-out thrombus-removal strategies remain relevant in refractory thrombus-rich PCI. This contemporary narrative review, supplemented by six retrospective single-center clinical examples, describes off-label guide-extension catheter (GEC)-assisted thrombus aspiration and places it within the current thrombectomy landscape, including manual aspiration catheters, sustained mechanical aspiration platforms, and stent-retriever-based systems. The heterogeneous examples, predominantly involving the right coronary artery, are educational and hypothesis-generating only: they illustrate procedural mechanics, patient selection, technical pitfalls, and risk mitigation, but do not provide efficacy or safety evidence. GEC-assisted aspiration may be considered when bulky proximal thrombus cannot be captured by smaller catheters or when a GEC can be positioned coaxially near the thrombus face under uninterrupted negative pressure. The technique remains operator-dependent, off-label, and anatomically constrained and should be regarded as a contingency maneuver rather than an alternative to purpose-built systems with more formal device-specific evaluation. Prospective registries and comparative studies are required before efficacy, safety, or relative value can be established.