Sepsis is a major global health problem that results from a dysregulated and uncontrolled host response to infection, causing organ failure. Despite effective anti-infective therapy and supportive treatments, the mortality rate of sepsis remains high. Approximately 30–80% of patients with sepsis may develop disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), which can double the mortality rate. There is currently no definitive treatment approach for sepsis, with etiologic treatment being the cornerstone of therapy for sepsis-associated DIC. Early detection, diagnosis, and treatment are critical factors that impact the prognosis of sepsis-related DIC. Over the past several decades, researchers have made continuous efforts to better understand the mechanisms of DIC in sepsis, as well as improve its quantitative diagnosis and treatment. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of sepsis-related DIC, focusing on common causes and diagnoses, with the goal of guiding healthcare providers in the care of patients with sepsis.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a recurrent complication of sepsis. Since DIC not only promotes organ dysfunction but also represents a strong prognostic factor, it is important to diagnose DIC as early as possible. When coagulation is activated, fibrinolysis is inhibited, blood thinners are consumed, and a condition is created that promotes blood clotting, making it more difficult for the body to remove fibrin or prevent it from being deposited in the blood vessels. This leads to microvascular thrombosis, which plays a role in organ dysfunction. Despite efforts to understand the underlying mechanisms of sepsis-induced DIC, healthcare providers worldwide still face challenges in effectively treating this condition. In this review, we provide an in-depth analysis of the available strategies for sepsis-induced DIC, considering their effectiveness, limitations, and potential for future advances. Corticosteroids (CS), recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM), vitamin C, fibrinolytic therapy, and platelet transfusion are among the treatments discussed in the review. In addition, we are specifically addressing immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) by investigating treatments such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interferon gamma (IFN-γ), and mesenchymal stem cell therapy (MSC). Finally, we also examined how these therapies might affect COVID-19 cases, which often present with sepsis-induced DIC. The review suggests that targeted experiments with randomization are needed to verify the effectiveness of these treatments and to discover novel approaches to treat sepsis-induced DIC. By increasing our knowledge of sepsis-induced DIC, we can develop targeted treatments that have the potential to save lives and improve outcomes.

Ceftobiprole is a new therapeutic option for bacterial pneumonia, with activity against most antimicrobial resistant gram-positive cocci, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Data on the use of Ceftobiprole in real life are limited. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Ceftobiprole in a context of real life hospital practice. In a single center, observational, retrospective clinical study, we collected data of 29 patients undergoing Ceftobiprole therapy, with a focus on clinical outcomes and adverse events. There was a high burden of comorbidities in the study cohort, including kidney dysfunction (38%) and cancer (24%), and high proportion of patients with sepsis/septic shock (72%), a central line (41%) or on mechanical ventilation (21%). Most infections were nosocomial (24, 82.8%). Ceftobiprole was mostly prescribed because of pneumonia (17 patients, 58.6%), and bloodstream infection (10 patients, 34.5%), both empirically (9 cases, 31%) and as targeted therapy (20, 69%, with Staphylococci as the dominant pathogens). It was the first-line drug in 15 cases (51.7%). Overall, a favorable clinical outcome was observed in the majority of cases (68.9%), with clinical cure in 3 (10.3%) and clinical improvement in 17 (58.6%). Failure of treatment occurred in 7 cases (24.1%). Three patients experienced a definite Ceftobiprole-related adverse event, with 2 cases of myoclonus. No major adverse effects on bone marrow, kidney and liver function were observed. Ceftobiprole, even outside current indications, may be a safe and effective treatment for resistant gram-positive cocci infections where other molecules are inactive or poorly tolerated and for salvage therapy.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently causing a pandemic and will likely persist in endemic form in the foreseeable future. Physicians need to correctly approach this new disease, often representing a challenge in terms of differential diagnosis. Although COVID-19 lacks specific signs and symptoms, we believe internists should develop specific skills to recognize the disease, learning its ‘semeiotic’. In this review article, we summarize the key clinical features that may guide in differentiating a COVID-19 case, requiring specific testing, from upper respiratory and/or influenza-like illnesses of other aetiology. We consider two different clinical settings, where availability of the different diagnostic strategies differs widely: outpatient and inpatient. Our reasoning highlights how challenging a balanced approach to a patient with fever and flu-like symptoms can be. At present, clinical workup of COVID-19 remains a hard task to accomplish. However, knowledge of the natural history of the disease may aid the internist in putting common and unspecific symptoms into the correct clinical context.