Giuseppina Sgandurra

Prof. Giuseppina Sgandurra

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2017 in Computers in Human Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMaria Chiara Di Lieto
Maria Chiara Di Lieto
EIEmmanuela Inguaggiato
Emmanuela Inguaggiato
ECEmanuela Castro
Emanuela Castro
FCFrancesca Cecchi
Francesca Cecchi
GCGiovanni Cioni
Giovanni Cioni
PDPaolo Dario
Paolo Dario

29 March 2016 in Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GCGiovanni Cioni
Giovanni Cioni
EIEmmanuela Inguaggiato
Emmanuela Inguaggiato
Giuseppina SgandurraGiuseppina Sgandurra
Giuseppina Sgandurra

25 July 2013 in Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Giuseppina SgandurraGiuseppina Sgandurra
Giuseppina Sgandurra
AFAdriano Ferrari
Adriano Ferrari
GCGiuseppe Cossu
Giuseppe Cossu
Andrea GuzzettaAndrea Guzzetta
Andrea Guzzetta
LFLeonardo Fogassi
Leonardo Fogassi
GCGiovanni Cioni
Giovanni Cioni
Background . The properties of the mirror neuron system suggest a new type of upper limb (UL) rehabilitation in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP), based on observation of action therapy followed by execution of a variety of observed movements (AOT). Objective . We tested the effects of AOT in the Upper Limb Children Action Observation Training (UP-CAT) trial. Methods . In a randomized, evaluator-blinded, block-designed trial, 24 UCP children with mild to moderate hand impairment were assigned to 2 groups. The experimental group observed, 1 hour per day for 3 consecutive weeks, video sequences of unimanual or bimanual goal-directed actions and subsequently executed observed actions with the hemiparetic UL or both ULs. The control group performed the same actions in the same order as the experimental sample, but had watched computer games. The Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) scale was the primary outcome measure; the Melbourne assessment and ABILHAND-Kids were secondary ones. Outcomes were assessed at 1 week (T1), 8 weeks (T2), and 24 weeks (T3) after the end of the training. Results . The experimental group improved more ( P = .008) in score changes for the AHA at the primary endpoints T1 ( P = .008), T2 ( P = .019), and T3 ( P = .049). No between-group significant changes were found for ABILHAND-Kids or Melbourne assessment. Conclusions . UP-CAT improved daily UL activities in UCP children, suggesting a new rehabilitation approach based on a neurophysiological model of motor learning.

1 April 2007 in Gait & Posture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMichele Coluccini
Michele Coluccini
EMEliseo Stefano Maini
Eliseo Stefano Maini
CMChiara Martelloni
Chiara Martelloni
Giuseppina SgandurraGiuseppina Sgandurra
Giuseppina Sgandurra
GCGiovanni Cioni
Giovanni Cioni

22 March 2017 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giuseppina SgandurraGiuseppina Sgandurra
Giuseppina Sgandurra
JLJakob Lorentzen
Jakob Lorentzen
EIEmmanuela Inguaggiato
Emmanuela Inguaggiato
LBLaura Bartalena
Laura Bartalena
EBElena Beani
Elena Beani
OCOn behalf of The CareToy Consortium
On behalf of The CareToy Consortium
CareToy system is an innovative tele-rehabilitative tool, useful in providing intensive, individualized, home-based, family-centred Early Intervention (EI) in infants. Our aim was to evaluate, through a Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) study, the effects of CareToy intervention on early motor and visual development in preterm infants. 41 preterm infants (range age: 3.0–5.9 months of corrected age) were enrolled and randomized into two groups, CareToy and Standard Care. 19 infants randomized in CareToy group performed a 4-week CareToy program, while 22 allocated to control group completed 4 weeks of Standard Care. Infant Motor Profile (IMP) was primary outcome measure, Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and Teller Acuity Cards were secondary ones. Assessments were carried out at baseline (T0) and at the end of CareToy training or Standard Care period (T1). T1 was the primary endpoint. After RCT phase, 17 infants from control group carried out a 4-week CareToy program, while 18 infants from the CareToy group continued with Standard Care. At the end of this phase, infants were re-assessed at T2. In RCT phase, delta IMP total score and variation and performance sub-domains were significantly higher (P<0.050) in CareToy group if compared to Standard Care group. Similar results were found for Teller Acuity Cards, while no differences between groups were found for AIMS. No differences were found in any outcome measure results (T2-T0), between infants who started CareToy training before or after one month of standard care. This RCT study confirms the results of a previous pilot study, indicating that CareToy system can provide effective home-based EI. Trial Registration: This trial has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier NCT01990183).

27 November 2020 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECEugenia Conti
Eugenia Conti
Giuseppina SgandurraGiuseppina Sgandurra
Giuseppina Sgandurra
GNGiacomo De Nicola
Giacomo De Nicola
TBTommaso Biagioni
Tommaso Biagioni
SBSilvia Boldrini
Silvia Boldrini
Roberta BattiniRoberta Battini
Roberta Battini
On 11 March 2020, a national lockdown was imposed by the Italian government to contain the spread of COVID19 disease. This is an observational longitudinal study conducted at Fondazione Stella Maris (FSM), Italy to investigate lockdown-related emotional and behavioural changes in paediatric neuropsychiatric population. Families having children (1.5–18 years) with neuropsychiatric disorders referred to FSM have been contacted and proposed to fulfil two online questionnaires (General questionnaire and Child Behaviour Check List (CBCL)) to (i) compare (paired two-sample t-tests) the CBCL scores during lockdown with previous ones, and (ii) investigate the influence (multiple linear regression models) of variables such as age, diagnosis grouping (neurological, neurodevelopmental, emotional, and behavioural disorders) and financial hardship. One hundred and forty-one parents fulfilled the questionnaires. Anxiety and somatic problems increased in 1.5–5 years subpopulation, while obsessive-compulsive, post-traumatic and thought problems increased in 6–18 years subpopulation. In the regression models, younger age in the 1.5–5 years subpopulation resulted as “protective” while financial hardship experienced by families during lockdown was related to psychiatric symptoms increasing in the 6–18 years subpopulation. Some considerations, based on first clinical impressions, are provided in text together with comments in relation to previous and emerging literature on the topic.