Andreas Best

Prof. Dr. Andreas Best

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 September 2017 in Reviews of Modern Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RDR. J. Deboer
R. J. Deboer
JGJ. Görres
J. Görres
MWM. Wiescher
M. Wiescher
RAR. E. Azuma
R. E. Azuma
ABAndreas Best
Andreas Best
EUE. Uberseder
E. Uberseder
The creation of carbon and oxygen in our Universe is one of the forefront questions in nuclear astrophysics. The determination of the abundance of these elements is key to our understanding of both the formation of life on Earth and to the life cycles of stars. While nearly all models of different nucleosynthesis environments are affected by the production of carbon and oxygen, a key ingredient, the precise determination of the reaction rate of C12(α,γ)O16, has long remained elusive. This is owed to the reaction’s inaccessibility, both experimentally and theoretically. Nuclear theory has struggled to calculate this reaction rate because the cross section is produced through different underlying nuclear mechanisms. Isospin selection rules suppress the E1 component of the ground state cross section, creating a unique situation where the E1 and E2 contributions are of nearly equal amplitudes. Experimentally there have also been great challenges. Measurements have been pushed to the limits of state-of-the-art techniques, often developed for just these measurements. The data have been plagued by uncharacterized uncertainties, often the result of the novel measurement techniques that have made the different results challenging to reconcile. However, the situation has markedly improved in recent years, and the desired level of uncertainty ≈10% may be in sight. In this review the current understanding of this critical reaction is summarized. The emphasis is placed primarily on the experimental work and interpretation of the reaction data, but discussions of the theory and astrophysics are also pursued. The main goal is to summarize and clarify the current understanding of the reaction and then point the way forward to an improved determination of the reaction rate.

11 November 2020 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VMV. Mossa
V. Mossa
KSK. Stöckel
K. Stöckel
FCFrancesca Cavanna
Francesca Cavanna
FFF. Ferraro
F. Ferraro
MAM. Aliotta
M. Aliotta
SZS. Zavatarelli
S. Zavatarelli

1 March 2016 in Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAndreas Best
Andreas Best
JGJoachim Görres
Joachim Görres
MJMatthias Junker
Matthias Junker
KKKarl-Ludwig Kratz
Karl-Ludwig Kratz
MLMatthias Laubenstein
Matthias Laubenstein
MWMichael Wiescher
Michael Wiescher

1 March 2013 in Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASA. Simon
A. Simon
SQS.J. Quinn
S.J. Quinn
ASA. Spyrou
A. Spyrou
ABA. Battaglia
A. Battaglia
IBI. Beskin
I. Beskin
MWM. Wiescher
M. Wiescher

30 January 2017 in Nature Astronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MLM. Lugaro
M. Lugaro
AKA. I. Karakas
A. I. Karakas
CBC. G. Bruno
C. G. Bruno
MAM. Aliotta
M. Aliotta
LNL. R. Nittler
L. R. Nittler
DTD. Trezzi
D. Trezzi

1 January 2012 in Physics Letters B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FSF. Strieder
F. Strieder
BLB. Limata
B. Limata
AFA. Formicola
A. Formicola
GIGianluca Imbriani
Gianluca Imbriani
MJM. Junker
M. Junker
HTH.P. Trautvetter
H.P. Trautvetter