Zhi-Qiang Li

Dr. Zhi-Qiang Li

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 July 2017 in Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Yiguo XueYiguo Xue
Yiguo Xue
ZLZhi-Qiang Li
Zhi-Qiang Li
SLShucai Li
Shucai Li
DQDaohong Qiu
Daohong Qiu
Yufan TaoYufan Tao
Yufan Tao
KZKai Zhang
Kai Zhang

29 January 2025 in Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZLZhi-Qiang Li
Zhi-Qiang Li
LNLichao Nie
Lichao Nie
Yiguo XueYiguo Xue
Yiguo Xue
WLWei Li
Wei Li
KFKerui Fan
Kerui Fan

25 September 2018 in Marine Georesources & Geotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Yiguo XueYiguo Xue
Yiguo Xue
ZLZhi-Qiang Li
Zhi-Qiang Li
SLShucai Li
Shucai Li
DQDaohong Qiu
Daohong Qiu
MSMaoxin Su
Maoxin Su
Yufan TaoYufan Tao
Yufan Tao
The geological conditions of subsea tunnels are extremely complex, and a water inrush disaster is prone to occur when crossing a fault. Based on a geological analysis using cloud theory, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and entropy weight theory, we aim to establish a normal cloud model with combination weight for water inrush risk evaluation in subsea tunnels. We select seven main factors, namely, the surrounding rock grade, rock integrity, overburden thickness, seawater thickness, tunnel section, permeability coefficient, and construction technology level as risk assessment indicators for the evaluation model. The risk is divided into five levels, and the numerical characters of the cloud model are calculated based on the standard of each risk level. The subjective weight and the objective weight are determined using AHP and the entropy weight method. The combination weight is calculated using the Delphi method. The comprehensive certainty degree is used to determine the risk level of water inrush. The model is applied to the Qingdao subsea tunnel to evaluate the water inrush risk crossing the F4-1 fault, and the results are basically consistent with the actual excavation conditions. This article provides a new idea for the risk assessment of water inrush in the subsea tunnel.

1 April 2023 in Rock Mechanics Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ZLZhi-Qiang Li
Zhi-Qiang Li
XMXiaodong Ma
Xiaodong Ma
XKXiang-Zhao Kong
Xiang-Zhao Kong
MSMartin O. Saar
Martin O. Saar
DVDaniel Vogler
Daniel Vogler

18 January 2024 in Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LNLichao Nie
Lichao Nie
ZSZhicheng Song
Zhicheng Song
WZWei Zhou
Wei Zhou
ZLZhi-Qiang Li
Zhi-Qiang Li
XDXuecai Du
Xuecai Du
LMLiang Ma
Liang Ma

15 December 2017 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZLZhi-Qiang Li
Zhi-Qiang Li
Yiguo XueYiguo Xue
Yiguo Xue
DQDaohong Qiu
Daohong Qiu
ZXZhenhao Xu
Zhenhao Xu
XZXueliang Zhang
Xueliang Zhang
XWXintong Wang
Xintong Wang
Scientific site selection can significantly reduce construction risk and cost during construction of underground petroleum storage. Based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) theory and ideal point theory, a new site selection model for large underground petroleum storage is established in this paper. Nine indicators are selected as evaluation indices, including joint development, natural water-sealed condition, rock mass strength, in situ stress, environmental ecological vulnerability, regional stability, technical and economic conditions, topography, and meteorological conditions. Based on AHP theory, the weight of each evaluation index is determined. Secondly, the positive and negative ideal solutions of these evaluation indices are determined using ideal point theory. The ideal point evaluation function of each evaluation index is built to calculate the degree of closeness for the evaluation samples. Finally, the accuracy of the model is verified by using the model to evaluate the first underground petroleum storage project in China. The results show that the first six indicators are main controlling factors, and the sum of their weight is 88.3%. The result of the evaluation site level is good (II), which is suitable for construction. Moreover, the feasibility and accuracy of the evaluation criteria, and evaluation method is verified after cooperation with the power coefficient method and expert evaluation method. The research results can provide some references to the site selection of similar key projects.