The aim of this meta-analysis — to compare clinical outcomes and complications of the reconstruction of extensive long-bone defects of the limbs of various etiologies in patients older than 18 years using the Masquelet technique, the Ilizarov bone transport, and reconstructive procedures with vascularized bone flaps. Methods. Publications were searched in the eLIBRARY, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar databases for the period 2015–2025. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies addressing the reconstruction of extensive bone defects of the limbs using different techniques (the Masquelet technique (MT), bone transport (BT), and free vascularized flaps (FVF), particulary the fibular graft) were included in the analysis. Results. Nine publications involving a total of 375 patients were included in the meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of the techniques. The majority of cases involved long bones of the lower limbs (n = 332; 87%), most commonly the tibia (n = 284; 74%), followed by the femur (n = 48; 13%). Among upper limb injuries, extensive bone defects of the forearm were reported in 44 cases (12%) and of the humerus in 4 cases (1%). The overall duration of fixation did not differ significantly between MT and FVF groups, nor between MT and BT groups (p = 0.76 and p = 0.40, respectively). The proportion of patients achieving complete bone union without additional surgical interventions was significantly higher with BT compared to MT (86% vs. 61%, p = 0.02). The analysis of surgical site infection (SSI) rates revealed the following patterns: the proportion of patients with superficial SSI was significantly lower with MT compared to BT (11% vs. 23%, p = 0.0004). Conversely, the incidence of deep SSI was significantly higher with MT compared to BT (15% vs. 8%, p = 0.04). No statistically significant differences were found regarding nonunion rates or the conversion of surgical treatment to amputation. The proportion of patients with excellent or good outcomes according to the ASAMI score was 85% for MT and 71% for BT; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.48). Conclusion. The systematic literature review confirmed the effectiveness of all three methods: the Masquelet technique, the Ilizarov bone transport, and free vascularized flaps. The meta-analysis did not reveal a significant advantage of any single method in terms of fixation time or time to union; however, distinct safety profiles were identified and should be considered when selecting the surgical strategy. When choosing a technique for the reconstruction of large segmental bone defects, it is essential to take into account the defect location and length, soft tissue status, the presence and activity of infection, as well as individual patient characteristics, particularly treatment adherence and expectations regarding the quality of life.