Ivan VISENTIN

Prof. Ivan VISENTIN

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

26 September 2016 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IVIvan VISENTIN
Ivan VISENTIN
MVMarco Vitali
Marco Vitali
MFManuela Ferrero
Manuela Ferrero
YZYanxia Zhang
Yanxia Zhang
CRCarolien Ruyter‐Spira
Carolien Ruyter‐Spira
Francesca CardinaleFrancesca Cardinale
Francesca Cardinale
Summary: Strigolactones (SL) contribute to drought acclimatization in shoots, because SL‐depleted plants are hypersensitive to drought due to stomatal hyposensitivity to abscisic acid (ABA). However, under drought, SL biosynthesis is repressed in roots, suggesting organ specificity in their metabolism and role. Because SL can be transported acropetally, such a drop may also affect shoots, as a systemic indication of stress. We investigated this hypothesis by analysing molecularly and physiologically wild‐type (WT) tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) scions grafted onto SL‐depleted rootstocks, compared with self‐grafted WT and SL‐depleted genotypes, during a drought time‐course. Shoots receiving few SL from the roots behaved as if under mild stress even if irrigated. Their stomata were hypersensitive to ABA (likely via a localized enhancement of SL synthesis in shoots). Exogenous SL also enhanced stomata sensitivity to ABA. As the partial shift of SL synthesis from roots to shoots mimics what happens under drought, a reduction of root‐produced SL might represent a systemic signal unlinked from shootward ABA translocation, and sufficient to prime the plant for better stress avoidance.

20 March 2020 in Plant, Cell & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IVIvan VISENTIN
Ivan VISENTIN
CPChiara Pagliarani
Chiara Pagliarani
EDEleonora Deva
Eleonora Deva
ACAlessio Caracci
Alessio Caracci
VTVeronika Turečková
Veronika Turečková
Francesca CardinaleFrancesca Cardinale
Francesca Cardinale

31 January 2018 in Journal of Experimental Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFManuela Ferrero
Manuela Ferrero
CPChiara Pagliarani
Chiara Pagliarani
Ondrej NovakOndrej Novak
Ondrej Novak
AFAlessandra Ferrandino
Alessandra Ferrandino
Francesca CardinaleFrancesca Cardinale
Francesca Cardinale
ASAndrea Schubert
Andrea Schubert
Besides signalling to soil organisms, strigolactones (SLs) control above- and below-ground morphology, in particular shoot branching. Furthermore, SLs interact with stress responses, possibly thanks to a crosstalk with the abscisic acid (ABA) signal. In grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.), ABA drives the accumulation of anthocyanins over the ripening season. In this study, we investigated the effects of treatment with a synthetic strigolactone analogue, GR24, on anthocyanin accumulation in grape berries, in the presence or absence of exogenous ABA treatment. Experiments were performed both on severed, incubated berries, and on berries attached to the vine. Furthermore, we analysed the corresponding transcript concentrations of genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis, and in ABA biosynthesis, metabolism, and membrane transport. During the experiment time courses, berries showed the expected increase in soluble sugars and anthocyanins. GR24 treatment had no or little effect on anthocyanin accumulation, or on gene expression levels. Exogenous ABA treatment activated soluble sugar and anthocyanin accumulation, and enhanced expression of anthocyanin and ABA biosynthetic genes, and that of genes involved in ABA hydroxylation and membrane transport. Co-treatment of GR24 with ABA delayed anthocyanin accumulation, decreased expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes, and negatively affected ABA concentration. GR24 also enhanced the ABA-induced activation of ABA hydroxylase genes, while it down-regulated the ABA-induced activation of ABA transport genes. Our results show that GR24 affects the ABA-induced activation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in this non-climacteric fruit. We discuss possible mechanisms underlying this effect, and the potential role of SLs in ripening of non-ABA-treated berries.

1 March 2012 in Eukaryotic Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IVIvan VISENTIN
Ivan VISENTIN
VMV. Montis
V. Montis
KDK. Döll
K. Döll
CAC. Alabouvette
C. Alabouvette
GTG. Tamietti
G. Tamietti
Francesca CardinaleFrancesca Cardinale
Francesca Cardinale
When the fungal pathogen Gibberella moniliformis (anamorph, Fusarium verticillioides ) colonizes maize and maize-based products, it produces class B fumonisin (FB) mycotoxins, which are a significant threat to human and animal health. FB biosynthetic enzymes and accessory proteins are encoded by a set of clustered and cotranscribed genes collectively named FUM, whose molecular regulation is beginning to be unraveled by researchers. FB accumulation correlates with the amount of transcripts from the key FUM genes, FUM1 , FUM21 , and FUM8 . In fungi in general, gene expression is often partially controlled at the chromatin level in secondary metabolism; when this is the case, the deacetylation and acetylation (and other posttranslational modifications) of histones are usually crucial in the regulation of transcription. To assess whether epigenetic factors regulate the FB pathway, we monitored FB production and FUM1 , FUM21 , and FUM8 expression in the presence of a histone deacetylase inhibitor and verified by chromatin immunoprecipitation the relative degree of histone acetylation in the promoter regions of FUM1 , FUM21 , and FUM8 under FB-inducing and noninducing conditions. Moreover, we generated transgenic F. verticillioides strains expressing GFP under the control of the FUM1 promoter to determine whether its strength under FB-inducing and noninducing conditions was influenced by its location in the genome. Our results indicate a clear and differential role for chromatin remodeling in the regulation of FUM genes. This epigenetic regulation can be attained through the modulation of histone acetylation at the level of the promoter regions of the key biosynthetic genes FUM1 and FUM21 , but less so for FUM8 .

15 January 2018 in Journal of Experimental Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Francesca CardinaleFrancesca Cardinale
Francesca Cardinale
PKPaolo Korwin Krukowski
Paolo Korwin Krukowski
ASAndrea Schubert
Andrea Schubert
IVIvan VISENTIN
Ivan VISENTIN
After quickly touching upon general aspects of strigolactone biology and functions, including structure, synthesis, and perception, this review focuses on the role and regulation of the strigolactone pathway during osmotic stress, in light of the most recent research developments. We discuss available data on organ-specific dynamics of strigolactone synthesis and interaction with abscisic acid in the acclimatization response, with emphasis on the ecophysiological implications of the effects on the stomatal closure process. We highlight the importance of considering roots and shoots separately as well as combined versus individual stress treatments; and of performing reciprocal grafting experiments to work out organ contributions and long-distance signalling events and components under more realistic conditions. Finally, we elaborate on the question of if and how synthetic or natural strigolactones, alone or in combination with crop management strategies such as grafting, hold potential to maximize crop resilience to abiotic stresses.