Anna V. Mamatkulova

Ms. Anna V. Mamatkulova

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 July 2021 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Vladimir GushchinVladimir Gushchin
Vladimir Gushchin
ISInna Shuliakova
Inna Shuliakova
ASAlexey Shchetinin
Alexey Shchetinin
Alina OdintsovaAlina Odintsova
Alina Odintsova
ASAndrei Siniavin
Andrei Siniavin
AGAlexander L. Gintsburg
Alexander L. Gintsburg
Since the beginning of the 2021 year, all the main six vaccines against COVID-19 have been used in mass vaccination companies around the world. Virus neutralization and epidemiological efficacy drop obtained for several vaccines against the B.1.1.7, B.1.351 P.1, and B.1.617 genotypes are of concern. There is a growing number of reports on mutations in receptor-binding domain (RBD) increasing the transmissibility of the virus and escaping the neutralizing effect of antibodies. The Sputnik V vaccine is currently approved for use in more than 66 countries but its activity against variants of concern (VOC) is not extensively studied yet. Virus-neutralizing activity (VNA) of sera obtained from people vaccinated with Sputnik V in relation to internationally relevant genetic lineages B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1, B.1.617.2, B.1.617.3 and Moscow endemic variants B.1.1.141 (T385I) and B.1.1.317 (S477N, A522S) with mutations in the RBD domain has been assessed. The data obtained indicate no significant differences in VNA against B.1.1.7, B.1.617.3 and local genetic lineages B.1.1.141 (T385I), B.1.1.317 (S477N, A522S) with RBD mutations. For the B.1.351, P.1, and B.1.617.2 statistically significant 3.1-, 2.8-, and 2.5-fold, respectively, VNA reduction was observed. Notably, this decrease is lower than that reported in publications for other vaccines. However, a direct comparative study is necessary for a conclusion. Thus, sera from “Sputnik V”-vaccinated retain neutralizing activity against VOC B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1, B.1.617.2, B.1.617.3 as well as local genetic lineages B.1.1.141 and B.1.1.317 circulating in Moscow.

21 May 2022 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DLDaniele Lapa
Daniele Lapa
DGDaria M. Grousova
Daria M. Grousova
GMGiulia Matusali
Giulia Matusali
SMSilvia Meschi
Silvia Meschi
FCFrancesca Colavita
Francesca Colavita
AGAlexander L. Gintsburg
Alexander L. Gintsburg
The new Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2, first identified in November 2021, is rapidly spreading all around the world. Omicron has become the dominant variant of SARS-CoV-2. There are many ongoing studies evaluating the effectiveness of existing vaccines. Studies on the neutralizing activity of vaccinated sera against the Omicron variant are currently being carried out in many laboratories. In this study, we have shown the neutralizing activity of sera against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant compared to the reference Wuhan D614G variant in individuals vaccinated with two doses of Sputnik V up to 6 months after vaccination and in individuals who experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection either before or after vaccination. As a control to our study we also measured neutralizing antibody titers in individuals vaccinated with two doses of BNT162b2. The decrease in NtAb titers to the Omicron variant was 8.1-fold for the group of Sputnik V-vaccinated individuals. When the samples were stratified for the time period after vaccination, a 7.6-fold or 8.8-fold decrease in NtAb titers was noticed after up to 3 and 3-to-6 months after vaccination. We observed a 6.7- and 5-fold decrease in Sputnik V-vaccinated individuals experiencing asymptomatic or symptomatic infection, respectively. These results highlight the observation that the decrease in NtAb to the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant compared to the Wuhan variant occurs for different COVID-19 vaccines in use, with some showing no neutralization at all, confirming the necessity of a third booster vaccination.

26 September 2022 in Emerging Microbes & Infections
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Amir I. TukhvatulinAmir I. Tukhvatulin
Amir I. Tukhvatulin
IGIlya Gordeychuk
Ilya Gordeychuk
ISInna Shuliakova
Inna Shuliakova
ADAlina Dzharullaeva
Alina Dzharullaeva
MKMarina E. Krasina
Marina E. Krasina
AGAlexander L. Gintsburg
Alexander L. Gintsburg
Although unprecedented efforts aiming to stop the COVID-19 pandemic have been made over the past two years, SARSCoV-2 virus still continues to cause intolerable health and economical losses. Vaccines are considered the most effective way to prevent infectious diseases, which has been reaffirmed for COVID-19. However, in the context of the continuing virus spread because of insufficient vaccination coverage and emergence of new variants of concern, there is a high demand for vaccination strategy amendment. The ability to elicit protective immunity at the entry gates of infection provided by mucosal vaccination is key to block virus infection and transmission. Therefore, these mucosal vaccines are believed to be a “silver bullet” that could bring the pandemic to an end. Here, we demonstrate that the intranasally delivered Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V) vaccine induced a robust (no less than 180 days) systemic and local immune response in mice. High immunogenic properties of the vaccine were verified in non-human primates (common marmosets) by marked IgG and neutralizing antibody (NtAb) production in blood serum, antigen-specific Tcell proliferation and cytokine release of peripheral blood mononuclear cells accompanied by formation of IgA antibodies in the nasal mucosa. We also demonstrate that Sputnik V vaccine can provide sterilizing immunity in K18-hACE2 transgenic mice exposed to experimental lethal SARS-CoV-2 infection protecting them against severe lung immunopathology and mortality. We believe that intranasal Sputnik V vaccine is a promising novel needle-free mucosal vaccine candidate for primary immunization as well as for revaccination and is worth further clinical investigation.

1 January 2020 in Immunologiya
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AMAnna V. Mamatkulova
Anna V. Mamatkulova
ISInna Shuliakova
Inna Shuliakova
DGD.M. Grousova
D.M. Grousova
MBMaxim Balyasin
Maxim Balyasin
ABA.G. Botikov
A.G. Botikov
AGA.L. Gintsburg
A.L. Gintsburg

8 January 2025 in Medical Immunology (Russia)
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OPOlga Popova
Olga Popova
OZO. V. Zubkova
O. V. Zubkova
TOTatiana Andreevna Ozharovskaia
Tatiana Andreevna Ozharovskaia
DZD. I. Zrelkin
D. I. Zrelkin
DVDaria Voronina
Daria Voronina
AGA. L. Gintsburg
A. L. Gintsburg
Lassa hemorrhagic fever is an acute human infectious disease with high mortality rate and pandemic potential. To date, there are no approved drugs for the specific treatment or prevention of Lassa hemorrhagic fever in the world. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the immunobiological properties and preclinical safety of a candidate vaccine for the prevention of Lassa hemorrhagic fever (LHF) based on recombinant human adenoviral vectors. Standard genetic engineering techniques, molecular biology techniques, virological methods, and animal testing procedures were used in the course of the study. A combined vector candidate vaccine for the prevention of Lassa hemorrhagic fever has been designed and characterized. The vaccine is composed of two components for heterologous immunization in a prime-boost regimen. Both components are based on recombinant replication-defective adenovirus vectors. The first component of the vaccine is a recombinant human adenovirus type 26; the second component is a recombinant human adenovirus type 5. Both recombinant vectors contain the codon-optimized sequence of Lassa virus glycoprotein. Two experimental batches of the candidate vaccine were produced under GMP-conditions and analyzed. The results of studies in compliance with appropriate specifications for viral vector vaccines are provided. In preclinical studies in mice, antigen-specific IgG response was detected after immunization with two vaccine components, either separately, or in a prime-boost regimen. The time dynamics of the IgG response was also studied on 42, 77, 119 and 147 days after immunization. At the same time, despite achieving 100% seroconversion, no virus neutralizing antibodies were detected in any of the samples collected from immunized mice. A biodistribution study showed that 24 hours following intramuscular injection of the vaccine components, the DNA of adenovirus vectors was detected only at the site of injection and in regional lymph nodes. Based on preclinical safety assessments (including acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, immunotoxicity, allergenic properties, reproductive toxicity), no contraindications were found for initiation of the candidate Lassa vaccine clinical trials. Taken together, the results demonstrate that the candidate vaccine for prevention of Lassa hemorrhagic fever based on recombinant adenovirus vectors types 26 and 5 is a promising drug for specific immunoprophylaxis.

8 October 2024 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ISInna Shuliakova
Inna Shuliakova
Amir I. TukhvatulinAmir I. Tukhvatulin
Amir I. Tukhvatulin
DGDaria M. Grousova
Daria M. Grousova
IZIlya D. Zorkov
Ilya D. Zorkov
MKMarina E. Komyakova
Marina E. Komyakova
AGAlexander L. Gintsburg
Alexander L. Gintsburg
Background: The SARS-CoV-2 virus continuously acquires mutations, leading to the emergence of new variants. Notably, the effectiveness of global vaccination efforts has significantly declined with the rise and spread of the B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant. Methods: The study used virological, immunological and histological research methods, as well as methods of working with laboratory animals. In this study, we evaluated the Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V), an adenoviral vaccine developed by the N.F. Gamaleya National Research Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology, and conducted experiments on hemizygous K18-ACE2-transgenic F1 mice. The variants studied included B.1.1.1, B.1.1.7, B.1.351, B.1.1.28/P.1, B.1.617.2, and B.1.1.529 BA.5. Results: Our findings demonstrate that the Sputnik V vaccine elicits a robust humoral and cellular immune response, effectively protecting vaccinated animals from challenges posed by various SARS-CoV-2 variants. However, we observed a notable reduction in vaccine efficacy against the B.1.1.529 (Omicron BA.5) variant. Conclusions: Our results indicate that ongoing monitoring of emerging mutations is crucial to assess vaccine efficacy against new SARS-CoV-2 variants to identify those with pandemic potential. If protective efficacy declines, it will be imperative to develop new vaccines tailored to current variants of the virus.