Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) has been defined as infections that newly appear within a population or pre-existed but are now rapidly increasing in incidence or geographic range [1]. Africa i...

The valuation of the benefits to humans of ecosystem services (ESs) provided by nature has become increasingly important. A current challenge is the measurement of the range of benefits which are not traded in the marketplace and are generally considered intangible, with further challenges to even classify them formally, e.g., as cultural ecosystem services (CESs). Previous studies have emphasized a related challenge: the strong need for engagement of not just experts but ’ordinary people’. Approaches using participatory approaches and less formal communication pathways to draw out local CES values have been reported. However, critical reflections of those studies reported significant differences in understanding between ’outsider researchers’ and ’locals’, calling validity deeply into question. Even deliberative approaches backfired by significantly modifying local social constructs during elicitation. In this study, we demonstrate a fundamentally different kind of approach, developed from the bottom–up sustainability indicator development process called WeValue InSitu. It focuses not on improving deeper top–down ‘engagement’ of a specific topic, but instead on improving local articulation of existing envelopes of in situ human shared values, naturally integrated. The WeValue InSitu output is a framework of separate but interlinked concise Statements of local shared values. Some of these Statements may refer to values concerning ecosystems, but situated amongst others. Here, we analyze the outputs from 23 convenience groups in three sites in Nigeria and investigate the shared values found empirically against existing economics-based MEA classifications. The findings include hybrid values which span existing CES sub-categories and even across into market-based categories. This opens a discussion as to whether future ES valuation frameworks might evolve more usefully with foundations built on empirically derived typologies of human values, rather than bolt-on modifications to financially based economics concepts. It also raises questions about the validity of current valuations made which cannot capture empirically found human values.

Transformative learning processes that can trigger deep and long-lasting behaviour changes are highly sought after for targeted improvements ranging from human diet and health to pro-environmental behaviours. A step forward was the reporting of a method that reliably produces transformative learning outcomes (TLOs) as an (incidental) effect of group shared values crystallisation, but the theme of the TLOs could not be targeted, e.g., for pro-environmental behaviours. A recent exploratory study bolted on environmentally themed pre-Nudging and unexpectedly produced a heavy bias towards pro-environmental behaviour changes. Here, we investigated more systematically the influences of different Nudging types upon TLO themes produced using two further case study designs created for comparability with earlier studies and using the same process (WeValue InSitu) and post-event data collection of TLOs categorised as environmental/not and behavioural/not. Our findings show that most Nudging had no effect, including raising the profile of environmental photos and the materials used in the crystallisation process, having participants reflect on their environmental identities, or emphasising environmental topics before going home. However, Nudging which involved answering written questions on specific personal pro-environmental actions such as recycling, applied early on, was linked to desired results. This has pragmatic significance for sustainability practitioners and raises questions for further research on the mechanisms of both active learning and Nudging.