Alexander Bystritsky

Prof. Alexander Bystritsky


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2011 in Brain Stimulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAlexander Bystritsky
Alexander Bystritsky
AKAlex S. Korb
Alex S. Korb
PDPamela K. Douglas
Pamela K. Douglas
MCMark S. Cohen
Mark S. Cohen
WMWilliam P. Melega
William P. Melega
SYSeung-Schik Yoo
Seung-Schik Yoo

6 March 2011 in BMC Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BMByoung-Kyong Min
Byoung-Kyong Min
ABAlexander Bystritsky
Alexander Bystritsky
KJKwang-Ik Jung
Kwang-Ik Jung
KFKrisztina Fischer
Krisztina Fischer
YZYongzhi Zhang
Yongzhi Zhang
SYSeung-Schik Yoo
Seung-Schik Yoo
Background: Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder, which is attributed to uncontrollable abnormal hyper-excitability of neurons. We investigated the feasibility of using low-intensity, pulsed radiation of focused ultrasound (FUS) to non-invasively suppress epileptic activity in an animal model (rat), which was induced by the intraperitonial injection of pentylenetetrazol (PTZ).Results: After the onset of induced seizures, FUS was transcranially administered to the brain twice for three minutes each while undergoing electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring. An air-backed, spherical segment ultrasound transducer (diameter: 6 cm; radius-of-curvature: 7 cm) operating at a fundamental frequency of 690 KHz was used to deliver a train of 0.5 msec-long pulses of sonication at a repetitive rate of 100 Hz to the thalamic areas of the brain. The acoustic intensity (130 mW/cm2) used in the experiment was sufficiently within the range of safety guidelines for the clinical ultrasound imaging. The occurrence of epileptic EEG bursts from epilepsy-induced rats significantly decreased after sonication when it was compared to the pre-sonication epileptic state. The PTZ-induced control group that did not receive any sonication showed a sustained number of epileptic EEG signal bursts. The animals that underwent sonication also showed less severe epileptic behavior, as assessed by the Racine score. Histological analysis confirmed that the sonication did not cause any damage to the brain tissue.Conclusions: These results revealed that low-intensity, pulsed FUS sonication suppressed the number of epileptic signal bursts using acute epilepsy model in animal. Due to its non-invasiveness and spatial selectivity, FUS may offer new perspectives for a possible non-invasive treatment of epilepsy.

18 July 2006 in Molecular Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAlexander Bystritsky
Alexander Bystritsky

29 November 2001 in Depression and Anxiety
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ABAlexander Bystritsky
Alexander Bystritsky
RLRobert Paul Liberman
Robert Paul Liberman
SHSun Hwang
Sun Hwang
CWCharles J. Wallace
Charles J. Wallace
TVTanya Vapnik
Tanya Vapnik
SSSanjaya Saxena
Sanjaya Saxena
Treatment of obsessive‐compulsive disorder has focused almost exclusively on symptom reduction; however, deficits in social functioning and quality of life of individuals with this disorder may contribute more to their “burden,” suffering, and disability. To gauge the significance of social dysfunction and quality of life of persons with obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD), we made comparisons with a group of persons with schizophrenia matched for age and gender. Thirty‐one patients with OCD participating in a partial hospital treatment program were compared with 68 schizophrenic outpatients participating in a day rehabilitation program. The Independent Living Skills Survey (ILSS) and Lehman Quality of Life Scale (QOL) were administered before and after treatment for both cohorts. QOL scores were significantly lower for the OCD patients both before and after treatment, but improved significantly during treatment. OCD and schizophrenic patients had similar scores on almost every domain of the ILSS at pretreatment. The OCD patients improved significantly on many of the domains of social and independent living skills as a result of treatment and acquired significantly greater skills by post‐treatment than did their counterparts with schizophrenia; however, the performance of social and independent living skills by OCD patients remained less than satisfactory even in domains where they improved. In the areas of job and leisure skills, there were significant group‐by‐time interactions. We concluded that patients with severe OCD and patients with schizophrenia are equally socially impaired. However, OCD patients experience greater significant functional improvement with multimodal treatment. Depression and Anxiety 14:214–218, 2001.

1 July 2021 in Brain Stimulation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JSJohn M. Stern
John M. Stern
NSNorman Spivak
Norman Spivak
SBSergio A. Becerra
Sergio A. Becerra
Taylor KuhnTaylor Kuhn
Taylor Kuhn
AKAlexander S. Korb
Alexander S. Korb
ABAlexander Bystritsky
Alexander Bystritsky
Transcranial Focused Ultrasound (tFUS) is a promising new potential neuromodulation tool. However, the safety of tFUS neuromodulation has not yet been assessed adequately. Patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy electing to undergo an anterior temporal lobe resection present a unique opportunity to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tFUS neuromodulation. Histological changes in tissue after tFUS can be examined after surgical resection, while further potential safety concerns can be assessed using neuropsychological testing. Neuropsychological functions were assessed in eight patients before and after focused ultrasound sonication of the temporal lobe at intensities up to 5760 mW/cm2. Using the BrainSonix Pulsar 1002, tFUS was delivered under MR guidance, using the Siemens Magnetom 3T Prisma scanner. Neuropsychological changes were assessed using various batteries. Histological changes were assessed using hematoxylin and eosin staining, among others. With respect to safety, the histological analysis did not reveal any detectable damage to the tissue, except for one subject for whom the histology findings were inconclusive. In addition, neuropsychological testing did not show any statistically significant changes in any test, except for a slight decrease in performance on one of the tests after tFUS. This study supports the hypothesis that low-intensity Transcranial Focused Ultrasound (tFUS) used for neuromodulation of brain circuits at intensities up to 5760 mW/cm2 may be safe for use in human research. However, due to methodological limitations in this study and inconclusive findings, more work is warranted to establish the safety. Future directions include greater number of sonications as well as longer exposure at higher intensity levels to further assess the safety of tFUS for modulation of neuronal circuits.

15 July 2008 in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ABAlexander Bystritsky
Alexander Bystritsky
JKJonas T. Kaplan
Jonas T. Kaplan
JFJamie D. Feusner
Jamie D. Feusner
LKLauren E. Kerwin
Lauren E. Kerwin
MWMitali Wadekar
Mitali Wadekar
MIMarco Iacoboni
Marco Iacoboni
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method that holds promise for treating several psychiatric disorders. Yet the most effective location and parameters for treatment need more exploration. Also, whether rTMS is an effective treatment for individuals with a DSM-IV diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) has not been empirically tested. The goal of this pilot study was to evaluate whether functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-guided rTMS is effective in reducing symptoms of GAD. Ten participants with a DSM-IV diagnosis of GAD, recruited from the UCLA Anxiety Disorders Program, and between the ages of 18 and 56 years were enrolled in the study from August 2006 to March 2007. A pretreatment symptom provocation fMRI experiment was used to determine the most active location in the prefrontal cortex of the participants. Ten participants completed 6 sessions of rTMS over the course of 3 weeks, stereotactically directed to the previously determined prefrontal location. The primary efficacy measures were the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement of Illness (CGI-I) scale. Response to treatment was defined as a reduction of 50% or more on the HAM-A and a CGI-I score of 1 or 2 ("very much improved" or "much improved," respectively). Overall, rTMS was associated with significant decreases in HAM-A scores (t = 6.044, p = .001) indicative of clinical improvement in GAD symptoms. At endpoint, 6 (60%) of the 10 participants who completed the study showed reductions of 50% or more on the HAM-A and a CGI-I score of 1 or 2; those 6 subjects also had an endpoint HAM-A score < 8, therefore meeting criteria for remission. Results of the current study suggest that fMRI-guided rTMS treatment may be a beneficial technique for the treatment of anxiety disorders. Limitations include a small sample size and open-label design with a technology that may be associated with a large placebo response. These limitations necessitate further research to determine whether rTMS is indeed effective in treating anxiety disorders.