Isabelle Boucoiran

Dr. Isabelle Boucoiran


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2021 in Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IBIsabelle Boucoiran
Isabelle Boucoiran
MYMark Yudin
Mark Yudin
VPVanessa Poliquin
Vanessa Poliquin
SCSheila Caddy
Sheila Caddy
SGSoren Gantt
Soren Gantt
ECEliana Castillo
Eliana Castillo

1 March 2021 in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMeggie Lallier Beaudoin
Meggie Lallier Beaudoin
CRChristian Renaud
Christian Renaud
MBMarc Boucher
Marc Boucher
FKFatima Kakkar
Fatima Kakkar
SGSoren Gantt
Soren Gantt
IBIsabelle Boucoiran
Isabelle Boucoiran
To assess the choice and attitude of pregnant women regarding CMV serological screening and CMV prevention behaviors in pregnancy. In this cross-sectional study, pregnant women were recruited in a single center during routine prenatal screening tests at 11-16 weeks. Participants filled out a questionnaire assessing knowledge about congenital CMV (cCMV) infection, risk perception and willingness to have CMV serological screening as well as their attitude toward CMV prevention behaviors. Among 234 pregnant women, 74.4 % (95 % confidence interval: 68.8-80.0 %) wanted CMV serological screening in pregnancy. The factors significantly associated with the desire for screening were perceived risk and perceived severity of cCMV. An informed choice regarding CMV screening (value-consistent, based on good knowledge and deliberated) was performed by 54 % of women who chose the screening and 30 % of women who declined the screening (p = 0.039). The median scores regarding attitudes toward CMV prevention behaviors were 3.7/5 for avoiding sharing behaviors and 4.0/5 for not kissing a child on the lips. The majority of pregnant women want to have CMV serological screening once informed about congenital CMV infection. New tools need to be developed to allow for informed choice regarding CMV serological screening in pregnancy.

ABAnick Bérard
Anick Bérard
JGJessica Gorgui
Jessica Gorgui
VTVanina Tchuente
Vanina Tchuente
ALAnaïs Lacasse
Anaïs Lacasse
YGYessica-Haydee Gomez
Yessica-Haydee Gomez
VZValerie Zaphiratos
Valerie Zaphiratos
Introduction: We aimed to measure the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal mental health, stratifying on pregnancy status, trimester of gestation, and pandemic period/wave. Methods: Pregnant persons and persons who delivered in Canada during the pandemic, >18 years, were recruited, and data were collected using a web-based strategy. The current analysis includes data on persons enrolled between 06/2020–08/2021. Maternal sociodemographic indicators, mental health measures (Edinburgh Perinatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Generalized Anxiety Disorders (GAD-7), stress) were self-reported. Maternal mental health in pregnant women (stratified by trimester, and pandemic period/wave at recruitment) was compared with the mental health of women who had delivered; determinants of severe depression were identified with multivariate logistic regression models. Results: 2574 persons were pregnant and 626 had already delivered at recruitment. Participants who had delivered had significantly higher mean depressive symptom scores compared to those pregnant at recruitment (9.1 (SD, 5.7) vs. 8.4 (SD, 5.3), p = 0.009). Maternal anxiety (aOR 1.51; 95%CI 1.44–1.59) and stress (aOR 1.35; 95%CI 1.24–1.48) were the most significant predictors of severe maternal depression (EDPS ˃ 13) in pregnancy. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on maternal depression during pregnancy and in the post-partum period. Given that gestational depression/anxiety/stress has been associated with preterm birth and childhood cognitive problems, it is essential to continue following women/children, and develop strategies to reduce COVID-19′s longer-term impact.

2 December 2015 in Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GMGabriella Martillotti
Gabriella Martillotti
IBIsabelle Boucoiran
Isabelle Boucoiran
ADAmélie Damphousse
Amélie Damphousse
AGAndrée Grignon
Andrée Grignon
EDEric Dubé
Eric Dubé
LMLucie Morin
Lucie Morin
Introduction: The objective of the study was to establish the predictive value of prenatal ultrasound markers for complex gastroschisis (GS) in the first 10 days of life. Material and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study over 11 years (2000-2011) of 117 GS cases, the following prenatal ultrasound signs were analyzed at the last second- and third-trimester ultrasounds: intrauterine growth restriction, intra-abdominal bowel dilatation (IABD) adjusted for gestational age, extra-abdominal bowel dilatation (EABD) ≥25 mm, stomach dilatation, stomach herniation, perturbed mesenteric circulation, absence of bowel lumen and echogenic dilated bowel loops (EDBL). Results: Among 114 live births, 16 newborns had complex GS (14.0%). Death was seen in 16 cases (13.7%): 3 intrauterine fetal deaths, 9 complex GS and 4 simple GS. Second-trimester markers had limited predictive value. Third-trimester IABD, EABD, EDBL, absence of intestinal lumen and perturbed mesenteric circulation were statistically associated with complex GS and death. IABD was able to predict complex GS with a sensitivity of 50%, a specificity of 91%, a positive predictive value of 47% and a negative predictive value of 92%. Discussion: Third-trimester IABD adjusted for gestational age appears to be the prenatal ultrasound marker most strongly associated with adverse outcome in GS.

1 July 2010 in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IBIsabelle Boucoiran
Isabelle Boucoiran
LVLaure Valerio
Laure Valerio
ABAli Fattahi Bafghi
Ali Fattahi Bafghi
JDJerome Delotte
Jerome Delotte
ABAndré Bongain
André Bongain

25 June 2021 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBSafari Joseph Balegamire
Safari Joseph Balegamire
CRChristian Renaud
Christian Renaud
BMBenoît Mâsse
Benoît Mâsse
KZKate Zinszer
Kate Zinszer
SGSoren Gantt
Soren Gantt
IBIsabelle Boucoiran
Isabelle Boucoiran
Introduction: Maternal Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in the first trimester (T1) of pregnancy is a public health concern, as it increases the risk of severe neurodevelopmental outcomes associated with congenital infection compared to infections occurring later during pregnancy. Objectives: To determine CMV seroprevalence in T1 of pregnancy, its trend, risk factors and the incidence rate of primary infection during pregnancy. Methods: Using the biobank of the prospective cohort “Grossesse en Santé de Québec” collected between April 2005 and March 2010 at the Québec-Laval Hospital, Québec, Canada, maternal CMV serology was determined using Abbott Architect Chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassays for immunoglobulin G(IgG), immunoglobulin M(IgM) titration and IgG avidity testing. Changepoint detection analysis was used to assess temporal trends. Risk factors associated with seropositivity were determined by multivariable logistic regression. Results: CMV seroprevalence in T1 of pregnancy was 23.4% (965/4111, 95% CI, 22.1–24.7%). The incidence rate for CMV primary infection during pregnancy was 1.8 (95% CI, 1.2–2.6) per 100 person-years. No changepoint was identified in the maternal CMV-seroprevalence trend. Multivariable analyses showed that T1 maternal CMV seropositivity was associated with having one child OR 1.3 (95% CI, 1.10–1.73) or two or more children OR 1.5 (95%CI, 1.1–2.1), ethnicity other than Caucasian OR 2.1 (95% CI, 1.1–3.8) and country of birth other than Canada and the USA OR 2.8 (95% CI, 1.5–4.9). Conclusions: In this cohort, maternal seroprevalence in T1 of pregnancy and seroconversion rate were low. This information and identified risk factors could help guide the development and implementation of preventive actions and evidence-based health policies to prevent CMV infection during pregnancy.