Eutrophication is a serious threat to aquatic ecosystems globally with pronounced negative effects in the Baltic and other semi-enclosed estuaries and regional seas, where algal growth associated with excess nutrients causes widespread oxygen free "dead zones" and other threats to sustainability. Decades of policy initiatives to reduce external (land-based and atmospheric) nutrient loads have so far failed to control Baltic Sea eutrophication, which is compounded by significant internal release of legacy phosphorus (P) and biological nitrogen (N) fixation. Farming and harvesting of the native mussel species (Mytilus edulis/trossulus) is a promising internal measure for eutrophication control in the brackish Baltic Sea. Mussels from the more saline outer Baltic had higher N and P content than those from either the inner or central Baltic. Despite their relatively low nutrient content, harvesting farmed mussels from the central Baltic can be a cost-effective complement to land-based measures needed to reach eutrophication status targets and is an important contributor to circularity. Cost effectiveness of nutrient removal is more dependent on farm type than mussel nutrient content, suggesting the need for additional development of farm technology. Furthermore, current regulations are not sufficiently conducive to implementation of internal measures, and may constitute a bottleneck for reaching eutrophication status targets in the Baltic Sea and elsewhere.

The rock type of hard substrata marine habitats can affect numerous benthic invertebrates, but little is known of the effects on molluscan assemblages, for example, the chitons often found under intertidal boulders. We compared chiton assemblage composition, abundance, species richness, and patterns of frequency distribution in 10 boulder fields containing either hard metamorphic/igneous boulders or soft limestone boulders in two geographical areas in South Australia. Similar species richness occurred in both types of boulder fields, but hard rock boulder fields had greater overall abundances, because of particularly large abundances of some common species. Differences in abundances of common species also resulted in significantly different assemblages occurring between the boulder field types. Some species appeared aggregated among boulders, but this pattern was variable between boulders in differing areas and of differing rock type. In one area, a common species had variable aggregation that caused frequency distributions to differ significantly between boulders of different rock types. These results indicate that rock type needs to be considered when investigating ecological patterns and processes involving specialist molluscs such as under-boulder chitons and to ensure comprehensive marine reserve planning for protecting rare invertebrates in rocky intertidal reefs.